[#36034] [Backport92 - Backport #4651][Open] Bus Error using continuation on x86_64-darwin11.0.0 (Lion) — Erik Michaels-Ober <sferik@...>

17 messages 2011/05/07

[#36058] draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3 — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

18 messages 2011/05/09

[#36131] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma. — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

Hi arton,

7 messages 2011/05/12

[#36156] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4683][Open] [PATCH] io.c: copy_stream execute interrupts and retry — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2011/05/12

[#36316] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731][Open] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>

12 messages 2011/05/18

[#36329] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4738][Open] gem install fails with "Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError" on windows 7 greek — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/05/19

[#36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

23 messages 2011/05/22

[#36406] 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello core people,

18 messages 2011/05/23
[#36414] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/05/23

2011/5/23 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#36487] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/05/26

Hi Luis,

[#36488] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2011/05/26

From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>

[#36496] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2011/05/26

From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp>

[#36712] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/06/03

Ping Luis, how's it going?

[#36748] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/06/05

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wro=

[#36434] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4774][Open] User Friendly Handling of "Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError" — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/05/24

[#36447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4777][Open] Ruby 1.9.2-p180 ignoring INT, TERM, and QUIT until it receives CONT — Nathan Sobo <nathansobo@...>

10 messages 2011/05/25

[#36559] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>

48 messages 2011/05/30
[#36560] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/05/30

Hi,

[#36571] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...> 2011/05/30

> Iff =A0{'key': 'value'} means {:key =3D> 'value'} I have no objection.

[#36573] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/05/30

Hi,

[#36578] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Cezary <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/05/30

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:21:32PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#36580] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/05/30

Em 30-05-2011 07:58, Cezary escreveu:

[#36581] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Michael Edgar <adgar@...> 2011/05/30

Since :"#{abc}" is allowed in Ruby, I imagine that any such substitute =

[#36587] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Cezary <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/05/30

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Michael Edgar wrote:

[ruby-core:36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch

From: Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Date: 2011-05-22 16:52:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #36390
Issue #4766 has been reported by Yusuke Endoh.

----------------------------------------
Feature #4766: Range#bsearch
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4766

Author: Yusuke Endoh
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
Category: 
Target version: 1.9.3


Hello,

I propose Range#bsearch for binary search:

  ary = [0, 4, 7, 10, 12]
  p (0..4).bserach {|i| ary[i] >= 4 } #=> 1
  p (0..4).bserach {|i| ary[i] >= 6 } #=> 2

  p (0.0...Float::INFINITY).bsearch {|x| Math.log(x) >= 0 } #=> 1.0


Rdoc:

 *  call-seq:
 *     rng.bsearch {|obj| block }  -> element
 *
 *  Returns the minimum value in range which meets the block by binary search.
 *  The block must be monotone for arguments; in other words, it must have any
 *  following properties:
 *
 *    - there is a value so that the block returns false for any smaller value
 *      than the value, and that the block returns true for any bigger (or
 *      equal) value than the value,
 *    - the block always return true, or
 *    - the block always return false.
 *
 *  If the block is not monotone, the behavior is not unspecified.
 *
 *  Returns nil when there is no value that meets the block..
 *
 *
 *     ary = [0, 4, 7, 10, 12]
 *     (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| ary[i] >= 4 } #=> 1
 *     (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| ary[i] >= 6 } #=> 2
 *     (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| ary[i] >= 8 } #=> 3
 *     (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| ary[i] >= 100 } #=> nil
 *
 *     (0.0...Float::INFINITY).bsearch {|x| Math.log(x) >= 0 } #=> 1.0
 *
 *
 *  Note that this method does not stop search immediately when the block
 *  returns true.  This is because this method find the *minimum* value:
 *
 *     ary = [0, 100, 100, 100, 200]
 *     (0..4).bsearch {|i| p ary[i]; ary[i] >= 100 }
 *       # may output "100" more than once



Discussion:

You might think Array#bsearch is better.  But Array#bsearch has some problems:

  - Binary search is usable for not only an array but also a function.
    (See the above example for Math.log)
    Nevertheless, Array#bsearch can be used only for an array.
    Range#bsearch covers both.  You can use it for an array as follows:

      ary.sort!
      i = (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| condition(ary[i]) }
      p ary[i]

  - matz hated Array#bsearch because its precondition (Array must be sorted)
    seems too strong (to him).  [ruby-dev:17125]
    Range#bsearch has the same precondition in effect (the block must be
    monotone), but there is a difference that this condition is for "code",
    not "state".  In fact, Array#sort has a similar condition.


I think there is demand for this feature because similar feature requests
are often proposed: [ruby-dev:17122] [ruby-core:30892] [ruby-dev:38545]

More importantly, this feature is often required in many programming
contests :-)


A patch is attached.  Thank you for your consideration.

-- 
Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next