[#36711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4821][Open] Random Segfaults (in start_thread?) — Ivan Bortko <b2630639@...>

22 messages 2011/06/03

[#36730] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824][Open] Provide method Kernel#executed? — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

56 messages 2011/06/04

[#36750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830][Open] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

24 messages 2011/06/05

[#36785] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

53 messages 2011/06/06
[#36811] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/06/07

Hello,

[#36799] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4845][Open] Provide Class#cb_object_instantiated_from_literal(object) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/06/06

[#36834] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

10 messages 2011/06/08
[#36860] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/08

Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:

[#36863] Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2011/06/08
[#36866] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/08

Hi,

[#36873] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/06/09

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:49:06AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#37071] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4877][Open] Unify Variable Expansion within Strings — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

12 messages 2011/06/12

[#37106] ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello all.

10 messages 2011/06/13
[#37107] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/13

> Hello all.

[#37115] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/06/13

> Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.

[#37117] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/13

> > Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.

[#37164] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4890][Open] Enumerable#lazy — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

30 messages 2011/06/16

[#37170] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

61 messages 2011/06/16

[#37207] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4897][Open] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/ — Simon Baird <simon.baird@...>

43 messages 2011/06/17

[#37286] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4916][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _ASN1_put_eoc — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>

9 messages 2011/06/22

[#37324] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4923][Open] [ext/openssl] test_ssl.rb: test_client_auth fails — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

19 messages 2011/06/23

[#37576] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4938][Open] Add Random.bytes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

13 messages 2011/06/27

[#37612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4941][Open] cannot load such file -- rubygems.rb (LoadError) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

25 messages 2011/06/28

[ruby-core:36666] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766] Range#bsearch

From: "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
Date: 2011-06-01 11:20:05 UTC
List: ruby-core #36666
It might make sense for SortedSet (part if the stdlib), though.

Konstantin

On Jun 1, 2011, at 13:07 , Yusuke Endoh wrote:

>=20
> Issue #4766 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
>=20
> Target version changed from 1.9.3 to 1.9.x
>=20
> Thank you for your time.
>=20
>=20
>> Once you supply the block, the ordered attribute of a range does not mea=
n anything.
>=20
> I'm not sure if I could understand this correctly.  If the block handles
> its parameter in terms of the ordered attribute, is there no problem?
>=20
> Else, any method must work even if a supplied block ignores the context?
> Array#sort violates the rule, I think.
>=20
>=20
>> Besides that, as the example in the document shows, Range#bsearch is mor=
e indirect than say, Array#bsearch.
>=20
> Yes, for typical cases.  But Array#bsearch is not enough since it cannot
> be used over Float or big range.
>=20
> Anyway, I'm NOT against Array#bsearch.  It is a good thing.  But You
> rejected it.  Now do you accept Array#bsearch?
>=20
>=20
> Binary search is a practical matter than philosophy.
> Hope my proposal to get reconsidered.
>=20
> --=20
> Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
> ----------------------------------------
> Feature #4766: Range#bsearch
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4766
>=20
> Author: Yusuke Endoh
> Status: Rejected
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
> Category:=20
> Target version: 1.9.x
>=20
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> I propose Range#bsearch for binary search:
>=20
>  ary =3D [0, 4, 7, 10, 12]
>  p (0..4).bserach {|i| ary[i] >=3D 4 } #=3D> 1
>  p (0..4).bserach {|i| ary[i] >=3D 6 } #=3D> 2
>=20
>  p (0.0...Float::INFINITY).bsearch {|x| Math.log(x) >=3D 0 } #=3D> 1.0
>=20
>=20
> Rdoc:
>=20
> *  call-seq:
> *     rng.bsearch {|obj| block }  -> element
> *
> *  Returns the minimum value in range which meets the block by binary sea=
rch.
> *  The block must be monotone for arguments; in other words, it must have=
 any
> *  following properties:
> *
> *    - there is a value so that the block returns false for any smaller v=
alue
> *      than the value, and that the block returns true for any bigger (or
> *      equal) value than the value,
> *    - the block always return true, or
> *    - the block always return false.
> *
> *  If the block is not monotone, the behavior is not unspecified.
> *
> *  Returns nil when there is no value that meets the block..
> *
> *
> *     ary =3D [0, 4, 7, 10, 12]
> *     (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| ary[i] >=3D 4 } #=3D> 1
> *     (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| ary[i] >=3D 6 } #=3D> 2
> *     (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| ary[i] >=3D 8 } #=3D> 3
> *     (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| ary[i] >=3D 100 } #=3D> nil
> *
> *     (0.0...Float::INFINITY).bsearch {|x| Math.log(x) >=3D 0 } #=3D> 1.0
> *
> *
> *  Note that this method does not stop search immediately when the block
> *  returns true.  This is because this method find the *minimum* value:
> *
> *     ary =3D [0, 100, 100, 100, 200]
> *     (0..4).bsearch {|i| p ary[i]; ary[i] >=3D 100 }
> *       # may output "100" more than once
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Discussion:
>=20
> You might think Array#bsearch is better.  But Array#bsearch has some prob=
lems:
>=20
>  - Binary search is usable for not only an array but also a function.
>    (See the above example for Math.log)
>    Nevertheless, Array#bsearch can be used only for an array.
>    Range#bsearch covers both.  You can use it for an array as follows:
>=20
>      ary.sort!
>      i =3D (0...ary.size).bsearch {|i| condition(ary[i]) }
>      p ary[i]
>=20
>  - matz hated Array#bsearch because its precondition (Array must be sorte=
d)
>    seems too strong (to him).  [ruby-dev:17125]
>    Range#bsearch has the same precondition in effect (the block must be
>    monotone), but there is a difference that this condition is for "code"=
,
>    not "state".  In fact, Array#sort has a similar condition.
>=20
>=20
> I think there is demand for this feature because similar feature requests
> are often proposed: [ruby-dev:17122] [ruby-core:30892] [ruby-dev:38545]
>=20
> More importantly, this feature is often required in many programming
> contests :-)
>=20
>=20
> A patch is attached.  Thank you for your consideration.
>=20
> --=20
> Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org
>=20


In This Thread