[#35961] require performance on 1.9 — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
[#35985] [Backport92 - Backport #4641][Open] Please backport r31418 to 1.9.2 stable branch — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
[#36013] [Ruby 1.9 - RubySpec #4649][Open] Adding parallel constructors to Ruby 2.0 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
[#36046] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4655][Open] String#to_c does not support scientific notation — Tinco Andringa <mail@...>
[#36058] draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3 — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi Yugui, is there any plans for the next patch release of 1.9.2?
[#36108] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4666][Open] set ruby compatibility version to 1.9.3 in trunk — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> Even if 1.9.3 is still binary-compatible with 1.9.1, I think that it would be easier to change
2011/5/12 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
[#36131] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma. — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
Hi arton,
Hi,
[#36150] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4680][Open] [PATCH] io.c: fix busy wait with sendfile() — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#36156] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4683][Open] [PATCH] io.c: copy_stream execute interrupts and retry — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#36167] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[#36255] Whitespace conventions? — Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
So, while working on some documentation, I've noticed that there's a lot of
2011/5/17 Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>:
[#36285] unable to load irb, 1.9.3 mingw — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all, with mingw 1.9.3, I get the following when trying to load irb:
[#36314] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
[#36316] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731][Open] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#36322] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4734][Assigned] [ext/openssl] DSA#sign error — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#36337] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>
Akira Tanaka <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
Hi,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#36373] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757][Open] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included) — David Copeland <davetron5000@...>
2011/5/25 Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
[#36374] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4758][Open] yaml file not human readable when saving utf-8 — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
[#36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:54 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#36395] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4769][Open] Updated SMTP standards — "J.R. Garcia" <mrjohngarcia@...>
[#36406] 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hello core people,
2011/5/23 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
Hi Luis,
From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>
From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp>
Ping Luis, how's it going?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp> wrote:
(06/06/2011 01:16 PM), Luis Lavena wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>
[#36419] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4772][Open] Hash#add_keys — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36429] GC thought — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#36447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4777][Open] Ruby 1.9.2-p180 ignoring INT, TERM, and QUIT until it receives CONT — Nathan Sobo <nathansobo@...>
[#36463] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4778][Open] IO#each_chomped — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36474] Error reporting, backtraces and the debugger — Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
Dear people,
[#36479] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4784][Open] Import the JSON library — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#36494] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4786][Open] RCR new Feature: Numeric#grouped — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
[#36528] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4795][Open] Nested classes don't seem to resolve correctly when another class exists with the same name — John Feminella <johnf@...>
[#36536] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
[#36550] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4798][Open] test_process and test_signal errors and halts on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#36551] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4799][Open] M17N tests are too JP specific — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#36558] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
Hello, Xavier
[#36559] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>
Hi,
> Iff 'key': 'value'} means {:key => 'value'} I have no objection.
Hi,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:21:32PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Em 30-05-2011 07:58, Cezary escreveu:
Since :"#{abc}" is allowed in Ruby, I imagine that any such substitute syntax would preserve that property.
Em 30-05-2011 09:05, Michael Edgar escreveu:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Michael Edgar wrote:
Cezary:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:55:39AM +0900, Piotr Szotkowski wrote:
On May 30, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Cezary wrote:
On 5/30/11 9:24 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
On 02/06/2011, at 10:28 AM, Kurt Stephens wrote:
On 6/1/11 10:17 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:
[#36565] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4803][Open] RCLASS_SUPER won't compile for C extensions as of revision 31627 — Daniel Azuma <dazuma@...>
Hi,
[#36628] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4805][Open] Add X509::Name#hash_old for 0.9.X compat — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[ruby-core:36532] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?)
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Xavier Shay <xavier-list@rhnh.net> wrote:
>
> My last problem was related to the build system pushing things into $" and bypassing require.
>
> I now have a patch that I woud like to submit for consideration:
> https://gist.github.com/996418
>
Windows 7, x64, building with GCC 4.5.2 (32bits).
Patch applied to r31761, with the following warnings:
C:\Users\Luis\Projects\oss\ruby>git apply require-performance-fix-r31758.patch
require-performance-fix-r31758.patch:115: trailing whitespace.
/*
require-performance-fix-r31758.patch:128: trailing whitespace.
/*
require-performance-fix-r31758.patch:648: trailing whitespace.
basename = rb_funcall(rb_cFile,
rb_intern("basename"), 2,
require-performance-fix-r31758.patch:652: trailing whitespace.
file_name_with_extension =
rb_funcall(rb_cFile, rb_intern("join"), 2,
require-performance-fix-r31758.patch:728: trailing whitespace.
* This is the most common case, so optimize for it.
If not found, fall
warning: enc/make_encmake.rb has type 100644, expected 100755
warning: ext/extmk.rb has type 100644, expected 100755
warning: squelched 12 whitespace errors
warning: 17 lines add whitespace errors.
Details:
* It compiles OK
* I'm still waiting for test-all to complete (take ages on Windows)
Results:
https://gist.github.com/996965
If you look there, will find 2 1.9.3dev snapshots taken 1 month apart
from eachother, that was my dev testbed and it got incredible better
after some work done between these two revision.
In your article you're not mentioning against which revision was
tested, but will be great if you update it so we have more accurate
information to compare.
It is also worth mention that using this patch and test against
"simple-bench-ruby-io" [1] to measure require speed things
considerably changed:
For "run" to complete, using a RAMDisk, it took:
ruby 1.8.7 (2011-02-18 patchlevel 334) [i386-mingw32]
228 features in 1.251072 secs.
ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18) [i386-mingw32]
251 features in 3.931225 secs.
ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-05-28 trunk 31761) [i386-mingw32]
256 features in 1.195069 secs.
Your patched version:
ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-05-28 trunk 31761) [i386-mingw32]
255 features in 0.711041 secs.
[1] https://github.com/luislavena/simple-bench-ruby-io
--
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exup駻y