[#35961] require performance on 1.9 — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
[#35985] [Backport92 - Backport #4641][Open] Please backport r31418 to 1.9.2 stable branch — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
[#36013] [Ruby 1.9 - RubySpec #4649][Open] Adding parallel constructors to Ruby 2.0 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
[#36046] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4655][Open] String#to_c does not support scientific notation — Tinco Andringa <mail@...>
[#36058] draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3 — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi Yugui, is there any plans for the next patch release of 1.9.2?
[#36108] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4666][Open] set ruby compatibility version to 1.9.3 in trunk — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> Even if 1.9.3 is still binary-compatible with 1.9.1, I think that it would be easier to change
2011/5/12 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
[#36131] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma. — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
Hi arton,
Hi,
[#36150] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4680][Open] [PATCH] io.c: fix busy wait with sendfile() — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#36156] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4683][Open] [PATCH] io.c: copy_stream execute interrupts and retry — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#36167] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[#36255] Whitespace conventions? — Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
So, while working on some documentation, I've noticed that there's a lot of
2011/5/17 Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>:
[#36285] unable to load irb, 1.9.3 mingw — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all, with mingw 1.9.3, I get the following when trying to load irb:
[#36314] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
[#36316] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731][Open] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#36322] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4734][Assigned] [ext/openssl] DSA#sign error — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#36337] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>
Akira Tanaka <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
Hi,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#36373] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757][Open] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included) — David Copeland <davetron5000@...>
2011/5/25 Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
[#36374] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4758][Open] yaml file not human readable when saving utf-8 — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
[#36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:54 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#36395] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4769][Open] Updated SMTP standards — "J.R. Garcia" <mrjohngarcia@...>
[#36406] 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hello core people,
2011/5/23 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
Hi Luis,
From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>
From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp>
Ping Luis, how's it going?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp> wrote:
(06/06/2011 01:16 PM), Luis Lavena wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>
[#36419] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4772][Open] Hash#add_keys — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36429] GC thought — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#36447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4777][Open] Ruby 1.9.2-p180 ignoring INT, TERM, and QUIT until it receives CONT — Nathan Sobo <nathansobo@...>
[#36463] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4778][Open] IO#each_chomped — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36474] Error reporting, backtraces and the debugger — Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
Dear people,
[#36479] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4784][Open] Import the JSON library — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#36494] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4786][Open] RCR new Feature: Numeric#grouped — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
[#36528] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4795][Open] Nested classes don't seem to resolve correctly when another class exists with the same name — John Feminella <johnf@...>
[#36536] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
[#36550] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4798][Open] test_process and test_signal errors and halts on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#36551] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4799][Open] M17N tests are too JP specific — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#36558] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
Hello, Xavier
[#36559] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>
Hi,
> Iff 'key': 'value'} means {:key => 'value'} I have no objection.
Hi,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:21:32PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Em 30-05-2011 07:58, Cezary escreveu:
Since :"#{abc}" is allowed in Ruby, I imagine that any such substitute syntax would preserve that property.
Em 30-05-2011 09:05, Michael Edgar escreveu:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Michael Edgar wrote:
Cezary:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:55:39AM +0900, Piotr Szotkowski wrote:
On May 30, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Cezary wrote:
On 5/30/11 9:24 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
On 02/06/2011, at 10:28 AM, Kurt Stephens wrote:
On 6/1/11 10:17 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:
[#36565] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4803][Open] RCLASS_SUPER won't compile for C extensions as of revision 31627 — Daniel Azuma <dazuma@...>
Hi,
[#36628] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4805][Open] Add X509::Name#hash_old for 0.9.X compat — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[ruby-core:36087] Re: draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3
Hi Yugui, is there any plans for the next patch release of 1.9.2? Currently, Ruby support is broken in Debian unstable, for instance. It would be great to include a new patch release as soon as possible containing this fix: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4556 For those unfamiliar with the problem, here is a summary. Debian has disabled SSLv2 in their last package libssl1.0.0 due to security vulnerabilities (Ruby can be installed with 0.9.8 which was compiled with SSLv2 enabled). Ruby 1.9.2-p180 does not provide an option for compiling it without SSLv2 support. RVM allows compiling openssl from source and using it with: http://beginrescueend.com/packages/openssl/ This has at least two problems: 1 - People concerned about security might not want to enable SSLv2; 2 - That is what most concerns me. It gets almost impossible to use the pg gem in Debian unstable: That is due libpq depending on system libssl which is not compatible with the openssl provided by RVM which Ruby has been compiled against. This results in segmentation fault keeping it very hard to have, for instance, a Rails 3 application with PostgreSQL databases in Debian unstable. If #4556 is included in the next patch release to 1.9.2 this would be much simpler to deal with. Is there any schedule for that? Best regards, Rodrigo. Em 09-05-2011 12:43, Yuki Sonoda (Yugui) escreveu: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > First of all, I am sorry for proposing a plan to Ruby 1.9.3 so late. > I missed proposing it because of the earthquake in Japan. > > Now Ruby 1.9.3 is much stable than on Feb. Its feature is getting > stable. It's time to decide a plan to release Ruby 1.9.3. > > I propose the following rough schedule. > * The end of May: feature freeze. create ruby_1_9_3 branch. > * The end of Jan: implementation freeze. don't change without > permission after that. > * The end of Jul or early Aug: release Ruby 1.9.3 > > The possible release blocker is the recent improvement of GVL. It is a > change in the core piece of Ruby and I would like to have it in Ruby > 1.9.3 if possible. > I believe Kosaki-san is recently reviewing locks in YARV. Will it have > finished on the end of Jun? > > What do you think about the schedule?