[#36034] [Backport92 - Backport #4651][Open] Bus Error using continuation on x86_64-darwin11.0.0 (Lion) — Erik Michaels-Ober <sferik@...>

17 messages 2011/05/07

[#36058] draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3 — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

18 messages 2011/05/09

[#36131] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma. — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

Hi arton,

7 messages 2011/05/12

[#36156] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4683][Open] [PATCH] io.c: copy_stream execute interrupts and retry — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2011/05/12

[#36316] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731][Open] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>

12 messages 2011/05/18

[#36329] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4738][Open] gem install fails with "Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError" on windows 7 greek — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/05/19

[#36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

23 messages 2011/05/22

[#36406] 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello core people,

18 messages 2011/05/23
[#36414] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/05/23

2011/5/23 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#36487] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/05/26

Hi Luis,

[#36488] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2011/05/26

From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>

[#36496] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2011/05/26

From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp>

[#36712] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/06/03

Ping Luis, how's it going?

[#36748] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/06/05

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#36434] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4774][Open] User Friendly Handling of "Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError" — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/05/24

[#36447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4777][Open] Ruby 1.9.2-p180 ignoring INT, TERM, and QUIT until it receives CONT — Nathan Sobo <nathansobo@...>

10 messages 2011/05/25

[#36559] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>

48 messages 2011/05/30
[#36560] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/05/30

Hi,

[#36571] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...> 2011/05/30

> Iff 'key': 'value'} means {:key => 'value'} I have no objection.

[#36573] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/05/30

Hi,

[#36578] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Cezary <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/05/30

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:21:32PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#36580] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/05/30

Em 30-05-2011 07:58, Cezary escreveu:

[#36581] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Michael Edgar <adgar@...> 2011/05/30

Since :"#{abc}" is allowed in Ruby, I imagine that any such substitute syntax would preserve that property.

[#36587] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Cezary <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/05/30

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Michael Edgar wrote:

[ruby-core:36087] Re: draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3

From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Date: 2011-05-10 17:03:38 UTC
List: ruby-core #36087
Hi Yugui, is there any plans for the next patch release of 1.9.2?

Currently, Ruby support is broken in Debian unstable, for instance. It 
would be great to include a new patch release as soon as possible 
containing this fix:

http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4556

For those unfamiliar with the problem, here is a summary.

Debian has disabled SSLv2 in their last package libssl1.0.0 due to 
security vulnerabilities (Ruby can be installed with 0.9.8 which was 
compiled with SSLv2 enabled).

Ruby 1.9.2-p180 does not provide an option for compiling it without 
SSLv2 support. RVM allows compiling openssl from source and using it with:

http://beginrescueend.com/packages/openssl/

This has at least two problems:

1 - People concerned about security might not want to enable SSLv2;
2 - That is what most concerns me. It gets almost impossible to use the 
pg gem in Debian unstable:

That is due libpq depending on system libssl which is not compatible 
with the openssl provided by RVM which Ruby has been compiled against. 
This results in segmentation fault keeping it very hard to have, for 
instance, a Rails 3 application with PostgreSQL databases in Debian 
unstable.

If #4556 is included in the next patch release to 1.9.2 this would be 
much simpler to deal with.

Is there any schedule for that?

Best regards,

Rodrigo.

Em 09-05-2011 12:43, Yuki Sonoda (Yugui) escreveu:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> First of all, I am sorry for proposing a plan to Ruby 1.9.3 so late.
> I missed proposing it because of the earthquake in Japan.
>
> Now Ruby 1.9.3 is much stable than on Feb.  Its feature is getting
> stable. It's time to decide a plan to release Ruby 1.9.3.
>
> I propose the following rough schedule.
> * The end of May: feature freeze.  create ruby_1_9_3 branch.
> * The end of Jan: implementation freeze.  don't change without
> permission after that.
> * The end of Jul or early Aug: release Ruby 1.9.3
>
> The possible release blocker is the recent improvement of GVL.  It is a
> change in the core piece of Ruby and I would like to have it in Ruby
> 1.9.3 if possible.
> I believe Kosaki-san is recently reviewing locks in YARV.  Will it have
> finished on the end of Jun?
>
> What do you think about the schedule?


In This Thread