[#36034] [Backport92 - Backport #4651][Open] Bus Error using continuation on x86_64-darwin11.0.0 (Lion) — Erik Michaels-Ober <sferik@...>

17 messages 2011/05/07

[#36058] draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3 — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

18 messages 2011/05/09

[#36131] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma. — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

Hi arton,

7 messages 2011/05/12

[#36156] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4683][Open] [PATCH] io.c: copy_stream execute interrupts and retry — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2011/05/12

[#36316] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731][Open] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>

12 messages 2011/05/18

[#36329] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4738][Open] gem install fails with "Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError" on windows 7 greek — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/05/19

[#36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>

23 messages 2011/05/22

[#36406] 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello core people,

18 messages 2011/05/23
[#36414] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/05/23

2011/5/23 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#36487] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/05/26

Hi Luis,

[#36488] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2011/05/26

From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>

[#36496] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2011/05/26

From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp>

[#36712] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/06/03

Ping Luis, how's it going?

[#36748] Re: 1.8.7 release next month — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/06/05

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#36434] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4774][Open] User Friendly Handling of "Encoding::ConverterNotFoundError" — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/05/24

[#36447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4777][Open] Ruby 1.9.2-p180 ignoring INT, TERM, and QUIT until it receives CONT — Nathan Sobo <nathansobo@...>

10 messages 2011/05/25

[#36559] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>

48 messages 2011/05/30
[#36560] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/05/30

Hi,

[#36571] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...> 2011/05/30

> Iff 'key': 'value'} means {:key => 'value'} I have no objection.

[#36573] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/05/30

Hi,

[#36578] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Cezary <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/05/30

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:21:32PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#36580] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/05/30

Em 30-05-2011 07:58, Cezary escreveu:

[#36581] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Michael Edgar <adgar@...> 2011/05/30

Since :"#{abc}" is allowed in Ruby, I imagine that any such substitute syntax would preserve that property.

[#36587] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Cezary <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/05/30

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Michael Edgar wrote:

[ruby-core:36045] Retiring --with-baseruby?

From: Jos Backus <jos@...>
Date: 2011-05-08 18:45:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #36045
Hi,

Since ruby 1.9.2 appears to require ruby 1.8 in order to build
(--with-baseruby=), will ruby 1.8 be maintained indefinitely for this purpose?
It seems undoable to maintain binary packages for all possible platforms.

It's very unusual for a scripting language to depend on an earlier version of
itself to be available. Isn't this one of the reasons why miniruby is built?
Could the build be restructured to use miniruby instead?

Bug 3008 raised this issue but was Rejected. Perhaps touch'ing the generated
source files as suggested by Christian Htje could be used as a workaround?
People who build from source control could use this.

I don't expect an immediate fix, just wondering what the thinking is.

Thanks,
Jos

-- 
Jos Backus
jos at catnook.com

In This Thread

Prev Next