[#35961] require performance on 1.9 — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
[#35985] [Backport92 - Backport #4641][Open] Please backport r31418 to 1.9.2 stable branch — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
[#36013] [Ruby 1.9 - RubySpec #4649][Open] Adding parallel constructors to Ruby 2.0 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
[#36046] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4655][Open] String#to_c does not support scientific notation — Tinco Andringa <mail@...>
[#36058] draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3 — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi Yugui, is there any plans for the next patch release of 1.9.2?
[#36108] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4666][Open] set ruby compatibility version to 1.9.3 in trunk — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> Even if 1.9.3 is still binary-compatible with 1.9.1, I think that it would be easier to change
2011/5/12 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
[#36131] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma. — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
Hi arton,
Hi,
[#36150] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4680][Open] [PATCH] io.c: fix busy wait with sendfile() — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#36156] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4683][Open] [PATCH] io.c: copy_stream execute interrupts and retry — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#36167] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[#36255] Whitespace conventions? — Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
So, while working on some documentation, I've noticed that there's a lot of
2011/5/17 Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>:
[#36285] unable to load irb, 1.9.3 mingw — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all, with mingw 1.9.3, I get the following when trying to load irb:
[#36314] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
[#36316] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731][Open] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#36322] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4734][Assigned] [ext/openssl] DSA#sign error — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#36337] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>
Akira Tanaka <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
Hi,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#36373] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757][Open] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included) — David Copeland <davetron5000@...>
2011/5/25 Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
[#36374] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4758][Open] yaml file not human readable when saving utf-8 — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
[#36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:54 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#36395] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4769][Open] Updated SMTP standards — "J.R. Garcia" <mrjohngarcia@...>
[#36406] 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hello core people,
2011/5/23 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
Hi Luis,
From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>
From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp>
Ping Luis, how's it going?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp> wrote:
(06/06/2011 01:16 PM), Luis Lavena wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>
[#36419] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4772][Open] Hash#add_keys — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36429] GC thought — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#36447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4777][Open] Ruby 1.9.2-p180 ignoring INT, TERM, and QUIT until it receives CONT — Nathan Sobo <nathansobo@...>
[#36463] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4778][Open] IO#each_chomped — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36474] Error reporting, backtraces and the debugger — Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
Dear people,
[#36479] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4784][Open] Import the JSON library — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#36494] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4786][Open] RCR new Feature: Numeric#grouped — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
[#36528] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4795][Open] Nested classes don't seem to resolve correctly when another class exists with the same name — John Feminella <johnf@...>
[#36536] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
[#36550] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4798][Open] test_process and test_signal errors and halts on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#36551] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4799][Open] M17N tests are too JP specific — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#36558] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
Hello, Xavier
[#36559] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>
Hi,
> Iff 'key': 'value'} means {:key => 'value'} I have no objection.
Hi,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:21:32PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Em 30-05-2011 07:58, Cezary escreveu:
Since :"#{abc}" is allowed in Ruby, I imagine that any such substitute syntax would preserve that property.
Em 30-05-2011 09:05, Michael Edgar escreveu:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Michael Edgar wrote:
Cezary:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:55:39AM +0900, Piotr Szotkowski wrote:
On May 30, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Cezary wrote:
On 5/30/11 9:24 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
On 02/06/2011, at 10:28 AM, Kurt Stephens wrote:
On 6/1/11 10:17 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:
[#36565] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4803][Open] RCLASS_SUPER won't compile for C extensions as of revision 31627 — Daniel Azuma <dazuma@...>
Hi,
[#36628] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4805][Open] Add X509::Name#hash_old for 0.9.X compat — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[ruby-core:36339] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4086] Feature request: add String#contain? and {Enumerable,Array}#contain? methods
Issue #4086 has been updated by Roger Pack.
Ok I am updating to clarify this. The gist of the code change would be this (patch attached):
module Enumerable
alias contain? include?
end
class String
alias contain? include?
end
Which would allow for this to work:
[1,2,3].contain? 3
"a long sentence".contain? "sentence"
s.each_line { |line|
if line.contain? 'abc'
...
end
}
Which feels quite natural to me, and is the method name that I typically "reach for" first, only to have to load some other library to get it.
Benoit wrote:
>> Since ruby is typically not averse to several ways to do the same thing (example: Array#{detect,find}, Array#{collect,map} etc.)
> I personally disagree to this, such basic methods duplicated seems bad
design for readers. I like TMTOWTDI, but this is just confusing.
In this case I feel like it would be ok, though I am traditionally not a big fan of method duplication.
I also feel like it makes more sense to do both String and Enumerable at the same time since they have an "include?" method, so to keep it the same there.
Any feedback?
Thanks!
-roger-
----------------------------------------
Feature #4086: Feature request: add String#contain? and {Enumerable,Array}#contain? methods
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4086
Author: Roger Pack
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
=begin
Hello all.
I debated this suggestion previously on ruby talk ( http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/217473 ) and nobody seemed to have negative feedback, so here goes...
Currently Strings and Enumerables have a contain? method for searching for if one includes another.
I tend to "reach for" an include? method for the same, since it makes more sense in my head. For instance "is this string included in that one? Does this array include this member?"
Since ruby is typically not averse to several ways to do the same thing (example: Array#{detect,find}, Array#{collect,map} etc.) I propose that
new methods be added of String#contain? and {Enumerable,Array}#contain?
I'd be happy to code up a patch if it had a chance of being accepted.
Feedback welcome.
Cheers!
-roger
=end
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org