[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>

23 messages 2011/04/06

[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>

13 messages 2011/04/06

[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>

9 messages 2011/04/07

[#35666] caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Why does Ruby cache the ancestors chain? I mean, not why the implementation implies that, but why it works that way conceptually.

9 messages 2011/04/09

[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...

16 messages 2011/04/13

[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...

61 messages 2011/04/14
[#39566] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/15

[#39590] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/16

[#39593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@marc-andre.ca>:

[#39608] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/17

I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issue.

[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...

27 messages 2011/04/15

[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>

13 messages 2011/04/24

[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>

11 messages 2011/04/25

[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>

15 messages 2011/04/25

[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2011/04/25

[ruby-core:35953] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2190]FileUtils::chmod - allow symbolic mode

From: ted cooper <anthezium@...>
Date: 2011-04-29 18:37:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #35953
Issue #2190 has been updated by ted cooper.


+1
we have a million `chmod ...` expressions lurking because of this omission.  please accept this into trunk!
----------------------------------------
Feature #2190: FileUtils::chmod - allow symbolic mode
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/2190

Author: Suraj Kurapati
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: lib
Target version: 1.9.x


 Hello,
 
 I request that FileUtils::chmod() and FileUtils::chmod_R() accept 
 symbolic modes, which are strings like "u+x,g-w,o=" (see "symbolic 
 mode" in `man chmod` for details), in addition to the numeric modes 
 they currently accept.
 
 If my request is fulfilled, the following would be equivalent:
 
   FileUtils::chmod(0712, "file.txt")
 
   FileUtils::chmod("u=rwx,g=x,o=w", "file.txt")
 
 In addition, symbolic modes would allow delta/patch changes:
 
   FileUtils::chmod("g+w", "file.txt")
 
 This is not so easy with numeric modes, because you must
 first read the current mode, apply your delta/patch mode
 using a bitwise OR operation, and finally apply the new
 numeric mode using FileUtils::chmod().
 
 Thanks for your consideration.


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next