[#35599] Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...>
I've encountered a problem when using Proc#== (with both lambdas and
[#35613] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4539
Hi,
[#35618] Redmine issues — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Hello,
[#35621] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Open] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#35629] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — Mayank Kohaley <redmine@...>
[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>
> ----------------------------------------
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Issue #4558 has been updated by Eric Wong.
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>
(2012/11/28 16:10), matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
I believe this will be a spec change, albeit a small one. Can we
[#35636] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560][Open] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — Eric Wong <redmine@...>
[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>
[#35644] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Open] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>
[#35648] mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hello, I noticed the "mvm" branch in SVN hasn't been updated in over a year.
Hi Eric.
Has there been any thought on solving the C extension problem in MVM? In the present state, I've stopped working on it in Rubinius because there is no workable solution if there are C extensions in the mix.
Evan Phoenix <evan@fallingsnow.net> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35666] caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Why does Ruby cache the ancestors chain? I mean, not why the implementation i=
Ah, in case it is not clear, where I find the metaphor broken is in that you=
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wro=
[#35678] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Open] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
[#35699] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — redmine@...
[#35707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569][Open] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@...
[#35713] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571][Open] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — redmine@...
[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...
[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...
Can somebody please reopen this issue? Since the test suite fix is
Hi,
2011/9/16 Kenta Murata <muraken@gmail.com>:
2011/9/16 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@marc-andre.ca>:
On 16 September 2011 15:49, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@marc-andre.ca>:
2011/9/17 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
(2011/09/17 9:07), Tanaka Akira wrote:
I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issu=
2011/9/17 Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@gmail.com>:
2011/9/20 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
I haven't explained the reason of the error estimation in
On 21 September 2011 14:25, masa <masa16.tanaka@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35754] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@...
[#35759] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578][Open] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — redmine@...
[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...
[#35777] hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#35813] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...
[#35814] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...
[#35825] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Open] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — redmine@...
[#35828] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589][Open] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — redmine@...
[#35830] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3436] Spawn the timer thread lazily — redmine@...
[#35842] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4593][Open] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Alex Tambellini <atambellini@...>
[#35850] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Sakuro OZAWA <redmine@...>
[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:33 AM, yu nobuoka <nobuoka@r-definition.com>wrote:
2011/4/25 James Gray <james@graysoftinc.com>:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:29 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>
[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#35923] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Open] NilClass#to_hash — Tsuyoshi Sawada <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
[#35933] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Open] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Alex Neth <alex@...>
[#35943] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
[ruby-core:35748] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within
Issue #4574 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
More off topic. Here is very similar discussion by phthonia.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4092528/how-to-clamp-an-integer-to-some-range-in-python
----------------------------------------
Feature #4574: Numeric#within
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4574
Author: Yusuke Endoh
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
Category:
Target version: 1.9.3
Hello,
Many people have written programs that limits an integer/float
within a range like:
v = [[v, min].max, max].min
or
v = v < min ? min : (v < max ? v : max)
or
if v < min
v = min
elsif max < v
v = max
end
. But these are all too complex in spite of frequent idiom.
"[min, v, max].sort[1]" is cool, but slightly cryptic.
So I propose Numeric#within.
v = v.within(min, max)
Examples:
p 0.within(2, 5) #=> 2
p 2.within(2, 5) #=> 2
p 3.within(2, 5) #=> 3
p 5.within(2, 5) #=> 5
p 6.within(2, 5) #=> 6
What do you think?
Some Japanese committers agree with this idea, and proposed
other candidates of method name:
- Numeric#bound
- Numeric#limit
- Numeric#clip
- Numeric#into
- Numeric#crop
- Numeric#trim
- Range#bound # usage: (2..5).bound(0)
Anyway, I think that the length should be less than 9, because
it should be shorter than the sort idiom:
[min, v, max].sort[1]
v.xxxxxxxxx(min, max)
Here is a patch including both Numeric#within and Range#bound.
diff --git a/numeric.c b/numeric.c
index 34c378b..dad485f 100644
--- a/numeric.c
+++ b/numeric.c
@@ -1600,6 +1600,43 @@ num_round(int argc, VALUE* argv, VALUE num)
return flo_round(argc, argv, rb_Float(num));
}
+static int
+r_le(VALUE a, VALUE b)
+{
+ int c;
+ VALUE r = rb_funcall(a, rb_intern("<=>"), 1, b);
+
+ if (NIL_P(r))
+ return (int)Qfalse;
+ c = rb_cmpint(r, a, b);
+ if (c == 0)
+ return (int)INT2FIX(0);
+ if (c < 0)
+ return (int)Qtrue;
+ return (int)Qfalse;
+}
+
+/*
+ * call-seq:
+ * num.within(min, max) -> new_num
+ *
+ * Bounds <i>num</i> so that <i>min</i> <= new_num <= <i>max</i>.
+ * Returns min when num < min, max when num > end, otherwise
+ * num itself.
+ */
+
+static VALUE
+num_within(VALUE num, VALUE min, VALUE max)
+{
+ if (r_le(min, num)) {
+ if (r_le(max, num)) {
+ return max;
+ }
+ return num;
+ }
+ return min;
+}
+
/*
* call-seq:
* num.truncate -> integer
@@ -3424,6 +3461,7 @@ Init_Numeric(void)
rb_define_method(rb_cNumeric, "round", num_round, -1);
rb_define_method(rb_cNumeric, "truncate", num_truncate, 0);
rb_define_method(rb_cNumeric, "step", num_step, -1);
+ rb_define_method(rb_cNumeric, "within", num_within, 1);
rb_cInteger = rb_define_class("Integer", rb_cNumeric);
rb_undef_alloc_func(rb_cInteger);
diff --git a/range.c b/range.c
index 1866df1..2dd99f5 100644
--- a/range.c
+++ b/range.c
@@ -923,6 +923,41 @@ range_cover(VALUE range, VALUE val)
return Qfalse;
}
+/*
+ * call-seq:
+ * rng.bound(val) -> new_val
+ *
+ * Bounds val so that beg <= new_val <= end. This method returns
+ * beg when val < ben, end when val > end, otherwise, val itself.
+ * Raises an exception if val >= end and the range is exclusive.
+ *
+ * (2..5).bound(0) #=> 2
+ * (2..5).bound(2) #=> 2
+ * (2..5).bound(3) #=> 3
+ * (2..5).bound(5) #=> 5
+ * (2..5).bound(6) #=> 5
+ * (2...5).bound(6) #=> ArgumentError
+ */
+
+static VALUE
+range_bound(VALUE range, VALUE val)
+{
+ VALUE beg, end;
+
+ beg = RANGE_BEG(range);
+ end = RANGE_END(range);
+ if (r_le(beg, val)) {
+ if (r_le(end, val)) {
+ if (EXCL(range)) {
+ rb_raise(rb_eArgError, "more than or equal to the excluded range");
+ }
+ return end;
+ }
+ return val;
+ }
+ return beg;
+}
+
static VALUE
range_dumper(VALUE range)
{
@@ -1051,4 +1086,5 @@ Init_Range(void)
rb_define_method(rb_cRange, "member?", range_include, 1);
rb_define_method(rb_cRange, "include?", range_include, 1);
rb_define_method(rb_cRange, "cover?", range_cover, 1);
+ rb_define_method(rb_cRange, "bound", range_bound, 1);
}
--
Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org