[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>

23 messages 2011/04/06

[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>

13 messages 2011/04/06

[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>

9 messages 2011/04/07

[#35666] caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Why does Ruby cache the ancestors chain? I mean, not why the implementation implies that, but why it works that way conceptually.

9 messages 2011/04/09

[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...

16 messages 2011/04/13

[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...

61 messages 2011/04/14
[#39566] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/15

[#39590] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/16

[#39593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@marc-andre.ca>:

[#39608] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/17

I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issue.

[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...

27 messages 2011/04/15

[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>

13 messages 2011/04/24

[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>

11 messages 2011/04/25

[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>

15 messages 2011/04/25

[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2011/04/25

[ruby-core:35712] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566] followup of

From: redmine@...
Date: 2011-04-11 19:17:11 UTC
List: ruby-core #35712
Issue #4566 has been updated by jojelino lastname.


>>The patch seems wrong: first is the way check the gcc version, and the condition also wrong.

the definitive solution would be leaving only following line

#define DECL_SC_REG(type, r, reg) register type reg_##r

>>I doubt that this bug is reproduced only on mingw32.

to be honest, it doesn't be reproduced without -O flag. sure it was mingw32.

so i would like to say %edi & %esi is now clobbered for >=gcc 4.6 with optimization option 
enabled.
----------------------------------------
Bug #4566: followup of [ruby-core:32747] 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4566

Author: jojelino lastname
Status: Open
Priority: High
Assignee: 
Category: core
Target version: 1.9.3
ruby -v: revision 31234


[ruby-core:32747]

 Index: vm_exec.c
 ===================================================================
 --- vm_exec.c   (revision 31234)
 +++ vm_exec.c   (working copy)
 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 #include <math.h>
 
 -#if VMDEBUG > 0
 +#if (VMDEBUG > 0) | ((__GNUC__ >= 4) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ >= 6) && (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ >= 0))
 #define DECL_SC_REG(type, r, reg) register type reg_##r
 
 #elif __GNUC__ && __x86_64__ && !__clang__

please apply this, it resolves segmentation fault in gcc > 4.6 
specifying register name explicitly fails. although it worked in previous version.
if you continue using explicit register name, you gotta find workaround about it ;)


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread