[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>

23 messages 2011/04/06

[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>

13 messages 2011/04/06

[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>

9 messages 2011/04/07

[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...

16 messages 2011/04/13

[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...

61 messages 2011/04/14
[#39566] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/15

[#39590] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/16

[#39593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@marc-andre.ca>:

[#39608] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/17

I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issu=

[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...

27 messages 2011/04/15

[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>

13 messages 2011/04/24

[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>

11 messages 2011/04/25

[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>

15 messages 2011/04/25

[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2011/04/25

[ruby-core:35756] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error

From: Masaya TARUI <tarui@...>
Date: 2011-04-14 21:34:18 UTC
List: ruby-core #35756
Hi,

I feel that 1.8's Range#max is good.

1.9's Range#max sometimes does strange behavior.
>irb
irb(main):001:0> RUBY_DESCRIPTION
=> "ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-04-11 trunk 31261) [i386-mswin32_100]"
irb(main):002:0> (1..1.2).max
=> 1.2
irb(main):003:0> (1...1.2).max
TypeError: cannot exclude non Integer end value
irb(main):004:0> (1.1..3.2).max
=> 3.2
irb(main):005:0> (1.1..2).max
=> 2
irb(main):006:0> (1.1...2).max
=> 1

(1.1...2).max is 1 ?!!!
I cannot think it is correct result.

Here is 1.8's

irb(main):001:0> RUBY_DESCRIPTION
=> "ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]"
irb(main):002:0> (1..1.2).max
=> 1
irb(main):003:0> (1...1.2).max
=> 1
irb(main):004:0> (1.1..3.2).max
TypeError: can't iterate from Float
irb(main):005:0> (1.1..2).max
TypeError: can't iterate from Float
irb(main):006:0> (1.1...2).max
TypeError: can't iterate from Float

Here is better though it is sad not to be able to treat Float.

btw, I have used Range only with Integer :-)
-- 
Masaya TARUI
No Tool,No Life.

In This Thread