[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>

23 messages 2011/04/06

[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>

13 messages 2011/04/06

[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>

9 messages 2011/04/07

[#35666] caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Why does Ruby cache the ancestors chain? I mean, not why the implementation implies that, but why it works that way conceptually.

9 messages 2011/04/09

[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...

16 messages 2011/04/13

[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...

61 messages 2011/04/14
[#39566] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/15

[#39590] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/16

[#39593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@marc-andre.ca>:

[#39608] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/17

I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issue.

[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...

27 messages 2011/04/15

[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>

13 messages 2011/04/24

[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>

11 messages 2011/04/25

[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>

15 messages 2011/04/25

[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2011/04/25

[ruby-core:35749] Re: mvm branch status?

From: Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
Date: 2011-04-14 04:51:38 UTC
List: ruby-core #35749
Hi,

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 06:56, Charles Oliver Nutter
<headius@headius.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>> What C APIs are safe to use with MVM is not fully certain yet. or instance
>> there are process-global states other than C global variables like current
>> directory, signal masks, ... We are still exploring.
>
> For current directory, JRuby maintains that separately and any calls
> that are sensitive to cwd are modified to use this per-runtime value.
> Because we share the JVM, we can't safely chdir the entire process, so
> this was really the only way.

Shyouhei's branch works as the same.
% ./ruby-mvm -e 'p Dir.pwd; 2.times { RubyVM.new("ruby", "-e",
"Dir.chdir %q(.ext); p Dir.pwd").start }; sleep 1'
"/home/nahi/git/shyouhei-ruby/build"
"/home/nahi/git/shyouhei-ruby/build/.ext"
"/home/nahi/git/shyouhei-ruby/build/.ext"

https://github.com/shyouhei/ruby/tree/shyouhei%2Fmvm-topicalization

Shyouhei's branch introduced per VM initialization (InitVM_*) and some
ext/* extensions changed to use it. The remaining issue is that there
should be more exts which depends on C's static thing. libssl has
global error stack so ext/openssl must handle this... Is it worth
trying?

Regards,
// NaHi

In This Thread