[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases

59 messages 2011/09/04
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/05

2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:

[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/07

I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.

[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/07

2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>:

[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:

[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/09/08

Hi,

[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...> 2011/09/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto:

[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/08

(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:

[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:

[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Masaya TARUI <tarui@...> 2011/09/08

Hello Luis,

[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <tarui@prx.jp> wrote:

[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2011/09/04

[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

27 messages 2011/09/09

[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

13 messages 2011/09/13

[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

26 messages 2011/09/14

[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

18 messages 2011/09/19

[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>

10 messages 2011/09/20

[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

13 messages 2011/09/22

[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

20 messages 2011/09/25

[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>

18 messages 2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/09/27

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:

[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/09/27

On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/10/01

On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:

[#39751] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5375][Open] [mingw32] segfault on WinXP SP3 with 1.9.3dev@33347 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

26 messages 2011/09/27

[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/09/29

Hi,

[#39796] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5384][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-RC1 Fails to Compile on Solaris — Cyrus Lopez <cyrus@...>

11 messages 2011/09/30

[ruby-core:39508] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number

From: V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
Date: 2011-09-13 09:56:52 UTC
List: ruby-core #39508
Can somebody please reopen this issue? Since the test suite fix is
apparently wrong.

Thank you.


Vit


2011/8/30 Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@tiscali.cz>

>
> Issue #4576 has been updated by Vit Ondruch.
>
> File 0001-Fix-the-ronding-error-causing-wrong-evaluation-of-ra.patch added
>
> Usaku NAKAMURA wrote:
> > =begin
> >  Hello,
> >
> >  In message "[ruby-core:35804] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the
> last value, if end-exclusive and has float number"
> >      on Apr.18,2011 12:06:24, <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> >  > test_step_ruby_core_35753 seems depend on platform.
> >  > On i686-linux it fails.
> >
> >  Ah, I doubt it. Thank you.
> >
> >
> >  > May i partially revert an testcase of test_step_ruby_core_35753?
> >
> >  No.
> >  I guess that 1.5 stepping doesn't have error.
> >  Please test r31304.
> >
> >
> >  Regards,
> >  --
> >  U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>
> > =end
>
> Can we reopen this issue please? The fix of unit tests was wrong, fixing
> consequences instead of reasons. Moreover, it was not backported to 1.8.7,
> so we hit the issue again when preparing updated package for RHEL 6.2. You
> can find the discussion about the issue at [1] including proposed solution
> [2]. Could you please review and apply the attached patch and also backport
> it to 1.8.7?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733372
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520552
> ----------------------------------------
> Bug #4576: Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float
> number
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4576
>
> Author: Joey Zhou
> Status: Closed
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee:
> Category:
> Target version:
> ruby -v: -
>
>
> =begin
> Hi, I find that:
>
> * if: range.exclude_end? == true
> * and: any one in [begin_obj, end_obj, step] is a true Float(f.to_i != f)
> * and: unless begin_obj + step*int == end_obj
> * then: the result will miss the last value.
>
> for example:
>
>  p (1...6.3).step.to_a # => [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0], no 6.0
>  p (1.1...6).step.to_a # => [1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1], no 5.1
>  p (1...6).step(1.1).to_a # => [1.0, 2.1, 3.2, 4.300000000000001], no 5.4
>
>  p (1.0...6.6).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9], no 4.8
>  p (1.0...6.7).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9, 4.8]
>  p (1.0...6.8).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9, 4.8], no 6.7
>
> Maybe the #step is ok on integers, but there's something wrong if the range
> is end-exclusive and contain float numbers.
> =end
>
>
>
> --
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org
>
>

In This Thread