[#38647] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5130][Open] Thread.pass sticks on OpenBSD — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
[#38653] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5135][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-preview1 tests fails in Fedora Rawhide — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/8/4 Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@tiscali.cz>:
[#38666] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5138][Open] Add nonblocking IO that does not use exceptions for EOF and EWOULDBLOCK — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:35:15AM +0900, Yehuda Katz wrote:
(08/02/2011 07:46 AM), Aaron Patterson wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
(08/02/2011 08:14 AM), Eric Wong wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
(08/02/2011 08:35 AM), Eric Wong wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
2011/8/2 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
2011/8/2 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
Yehuda Katz
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:35:15AM +0900, Yehuda Katz wrote:
2011/8/2 Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>:
Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
"tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:03:19AM +0900, Eric Wong wrote:
Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:52:26AM +0900, Eric Wong wrote:
[#38695] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5144][Open] Remove GPL file from repository — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
[#38706] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5147][Open] mkmf should not require static library when ruby is built with --enable-shared — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
[#38831] Help out with the next version of ruby-lang.org — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
https://github.com/rubylang/ruby-lang.org
Great news! Congratulations for the initiative!
Just wondering why is it not under https://github.com/ruby account,
[#38866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5173][Open] [PATCH] json/generator: prevent GC of temporary strings — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#38881] Init_prelude gone in 1.9.3 — Christoph Kappel <unexist@...>
Dear list,
[#38894] Why Ruby has versioned paths? — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
Hello, could somebody please elaborate about reasons why Ruby uses versioned
2011/8/10 V鱈t Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com>
2011/8/10 Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@gmail.com>
2011/8/10 V鱈t Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com>
[#38911] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5183][Open] [PATCH] openssl: add OP_NO_COMPRESSION constant — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#38972] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5193][Open] ruby_thread_data_type linker errors fixed with RUBY_EXTERN — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#38980] :symbol.is_a?(String) — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
http://viewsourcecode.org/why/redhanded/inspect/SymbolIs_aString.html
What would ObjectSpace.each_object(String) { |o| p o } produce?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 17:01, Haase, Konstantin
This would only be feasible if frozen strings would truly be frozen. Currently, there are a lot of C extensions modifying frozen strings (which is why Rubinius and JRuby have to treat frozen strings as mutable). Unfortunately, the current C API gives access to the raw character array, making it impossible to prevent frozen strings from being modified. What if a cached, frozen string is modified? Also, I see it as a feature of symbols that they are not encoding aware.
[#39000] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5199][Open] ext/tk: RB_GC_GUARD seems to be needed in several places — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#39022] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5204][Open] `defined?(@@foo) && @foo` may fail — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
[#39025] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5206][Open] ruby -K should warn — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
[#39062] Releasing r33028 as Ruby 1.9.3 RC1 — Yugui <yugui@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:14 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> We are still suffering from a sample/test.rb failure for system(),
[#39079] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5221][Open] LoadEerror#path — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...>
[#39093] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5227][Open] Float#round fails on corner cases — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
Hi
(2011/08/27 4:40), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
Hi,
2011/8/29 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
Hi,
[#39118] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #921] autoload is not thread-safe — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
[#39120] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5233][Open] OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket has problems with encodings other than "ascii" — Niklas Baumstark <niklas.baumstark@...>
[#39134] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5237][Open] IO.copy_stream calls #read on an object infinitely many times — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#39142] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5239][Open] bootstraptest/runner.rb: assert_normal_exit logic broken on Debian/GNU kFreeBSD — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
> I've just checked, and FreeBSD 8.2 is also affected by this issue.
On 29/08/11 at 12:43 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
[#39146] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5240][Open] Hang when using threads + forks on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
[#39162] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5244][Open] Continuation causes Bus Error on Debian sparc — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
[#39184] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #1792][Closed] Fixnum#& 等が、Rational などを受けつける — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
Is it intentional?
[#39195] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5251][Open] Thread Change Breaks Windows Builds — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39216] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5253][Open] PTY with wait incorrectly sets exit status for exit command — Simon Chiang <simon.a.chiang@...>
[ruby-core:39198] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
Issue #4576 has been updated by Vit Ondruch. File 0001-Fix-the-ronding-error-causing-wrong-evaluation-of-ra.patch added Usaku NAKAMURA wrote: > =begin > Hello, > > In message "[ruby-core:35804] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number" > on Apr.18,2011 12:06:24, <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote: > > test_step_ruby_core_35753 seems depend on platform. > > On i686-linux it fails. > > Ah, I doubt it. Thank you. > > > > May i partially revert an testcase of test_step_ruby_core_35753? > > No. > I guess that 1.5 stepping doesn't have error. > Please test r31304. > > > Regards, > -- > U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> > =end Can we reopen this issue please? The fix of unit tests was wrong, fixing consequences instead of reasons. Moreover, it was not backported to 1.8.7, so we hit the issue again when preparing updated package for RHEL 6.2. You can find the discussion about the issue at [1] including proposed solution [2]. Could you please review and apply the attached patch and also backport it to 1.8.7? [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733372 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520552 ---------------------------------------- Bug #4576: Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4576 Author: Joey Zhou Status: Closed Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: ruby -v: - =begin Hi, I find that: * if: range.exclude_end? == true * and: any one in [begin_obj, end_obj, step] is a true Float(f.to_i != f) * and: unless begin_obj + step*int == end_obj * then: the result will miss the last value. for example: p (1...6.3).step.to_a # => [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0], no 6.0 p (1.1...6).step.to_a # => [1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1], no 5.1 p (1...6).step(1.1).to_a # => [1.0, 2.1, 3.2, 4.300000000000001], no 5.4 p (1.0...6.6).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9], no 4.8 p (1.0...6.7).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9, 4.8] p (1.0...6.8).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9, 4.8], no 6.7 Maybe the #step is ok on integers, but there's something wrong if the range is end-exclusive and contain float numbers. =end -- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org