ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#35599] Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...>

I've encountered a problem when using Proc#== (with both lambdas and

5 messages 2011/04/01
[#36923] Re: Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#37083] Re: Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2011/06/13

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:24 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#37084] Re: Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/13

(2011/06/13 21:32), Adam Prescott wrote:
[#37087] Re: Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2011/06/13

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:41 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#35605] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4550][Open] Loading an RSA public key during an HTTPS connection corrupts the connection — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

1 message 2011/04/03

[#35606] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4551][Open] uri.set_scheme should downcase schemes — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

4 messages 2011/04/03
[#35624] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4551] uri.set_scheme should downcase schemes — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/06

[#43444] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4551][Assigned] uri.set_scheme should downcase schemes — naruse <naruse@...> 2012/03/18

[#43471] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4551] uri.set_scheme should downcase schemes — "naruse (Yui NARUSE)" <naruse@...> 2012/03/19

[#35612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4554][Open] test_set_errors in test_x509store.rb fails on CentOS 5.5 — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/04/05
[#37048] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4554] test_set_errors in test_x509store.rb fails on CentOS 5.5 — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...> 2011/06/12

[#37057] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4554][Closed] test_set_errors in test_x509store.rb fails on CentOS 5.5 — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/12

[#35613] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

11 messages 2011/04/05
[#35617] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2011/04/05

> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4539
[#35673] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/09

Hi,
[#35675] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/09

Hi,
[#35685] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2011/04/10

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#35677] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2011/04/09

Hello,
[#35680] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/04/10

Hi,
[#35689] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/10

Hi,
[#35681] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <sorah@...> 2011/04/10

HI,
[#35682] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/10

Hi,
[#35676] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2011/04/09

Hi,

[#35614] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4530][Rejected] trunk "make check" gives "cannot load such file -- zlib" and "cannot load such file -- openssl" — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/05

[#35615] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4541][Assigned] Inconsistent Array.slice() — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/05

[#35616] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>

2 messages 2011/04/05
[#35687] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/10

Good news, Shyouhei! This will help encourage us to move JRuby to 1.9

[#35618] Redmine issues — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2011/04/05
[#35787] Re: Redmine issues — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/04/16

Hi.
[#35789] Re: Redmine issues — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/04/16

[#35838] Re: Redmine issues — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/04/20

(2011/04/17 2:43), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
[#35839] Re: Redmine issues — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/04/20

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:34 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#35840] Re: Redmine issues — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/04/21

[#35619] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

2 messages 2011/04/05
[#35622] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/05

Motohiro KOSAKI wrote:

[#35620] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4266] Timeouts in threads cause "ThreadError: deadlock; recursive locking" — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

1 message 2011/04/05

[#35621] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Open] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

7 messages 2011/04/05
[#35706] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35708] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35964] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/01

> Your patch looks reasonable to me, but maybe some platforms break under it...
[#35965] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/01

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35653] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Assigned] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/08

[#35966] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Closed] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/01

[#35623] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

1 message 2011/04/06

[#35625] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4549][Rejected] Can't start class names with non us-ascii chars — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/04/06
[#35627] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4549][Rejected] Can't start class names with non us-ascii chars — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/04/06

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 09:48, Yui NARUSE <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#35626] [Ruby - Feature #2350] Unicode specific functionality on String in 1.9 — Carl Hörberg <carl.hoerberg@...>

1 message 2011/04/06

[#35628] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4549] Can't start class names with non us-ascii chars — Carl Hörberg <carl.hoerberg@...>

1 message 2011/04/06

[#35629] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — Mayank Kohaley <redmine@...>

4 messages 2011/04/06
[#36926] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36932] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36934] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

(2011/06/10 22:56), Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#35630] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4557][Open] Invalid case behaviour when comparing a character read from a file — Steve Robb <redmine@...>

4 messages 2011/04/06
[#35646] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4557] Invalid case behaviour when comparing a character read from a file — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2011/04/07

[#35654] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4557][Assigned] Invalid case behaviour when comparing a character read from a file — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/08

[#35937] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4557] Invalid case behaviour when comparing a character read from a file — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/28

[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>

23 messages 2011/04/06
[#35703] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Closed] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#36999] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Closed] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/11

[#35641] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/07

> ----------------------------------------
[#35647] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/07

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35662] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/08

2011/4/8 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#35670] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/09

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35665] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...> 2011/04/09

[#35669] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/09

Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#35671] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/09

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35702] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/11

> Subject: [PATCH] io.c (rb_io_close): ensure IOError for cross-thread closes
[#35709] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/11

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35674] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...> 2011/04/09

[#35684] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/10

Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#35715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#35725] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/12

2011/4/12 <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#35732] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/04/13

Hello,
[#35735] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/13

Hi
[#35716] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#35726] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/12

> Issue #4558 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#35746] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/13

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35752] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/14

Hi
[#35755] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/14

KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>

13 messages 2011/04/06
[#37097] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2011/06/13

[#47645] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/09/22

[#50156] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/11/26

[#50251] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...> 2012/11/28

[#50252] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/11/28

(2012/11/28 16:10), matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
[#50505] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2012/12/03

I believe this will be a spec change, albeit a small one. Can we
[#50509] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/12/03

(2012/12/03 15:26), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#50513] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2012/12/03

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:15 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#37017] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Assigned] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37096] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/13

[#37091] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/13

[#46410] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/07/14

[#35633] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/06

[#35634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/07

[#35635] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/07

[#35636] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560][Open] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

6 messages 2011/04/07
[#35690] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — redmine@... 2011/04/10

[#35694] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/10

redmine@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#86039] [Ruby trunk Feature#4560] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — mame@... 2018/03/08

Issue #4560 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
[#43617] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4560][Assigned] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#48522] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4560] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...> 2012/10/28

[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>

9 messages 2011/04/07
[#35638] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...> 2011/04/07

[#36994] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37029] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/11

Hi,
[#37191] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Julian Raschke <julian@...> 2011/06/17

[#37491] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#35640] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Assigned] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/07

[#35642] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/04/07

[#37516] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Closed] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#35639] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553][Open] [PATCH] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — Michael Edgar <adgar@...>

I put this on the 1.9 redmine, but for some reason it appears no e-mail went out to the mailing list, so I've re-sent this feature request.

1 message 2011/04/07

[#35643] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4541] Inconsistent Array.slice() — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/07

[#35644] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Open] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>

6 messages 2011/04/07
[#35658] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <redmine@...> 2011/04/08

[#35661] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563] Dir#tell broken — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/08

Daniel Berger <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#35663] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2011/04/08

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35655] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Rejected] Dir#tell broken — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2011/04/08

[#35657] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Rejected] Dir#tell broken — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/04/08

[#35645] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/04/07
[#35651] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — Michael Edgar <adgar@...> 2011/04/07

The existence of `Set#first` is an artifact of Set including Enumerable and the very idea of "first" on a Set is an odd notion. A set by itself does not have ordering. I have implemented it to pick the first element because it is simplest, but someone calling "pick" on a set does not care which element it is. If one would prefer implementing it as an alias, I'd be fine with that.

[#35648] mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

Hello, I noticed the "mvm" branch in SVN hasn't been updated in over a year.

10 messages 2011/04/07
[#35649] Re: mvm branch status? — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/04/07

Hi Eric.
[#35650] Re: mvm branch status? — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2011/04/07

Has there been any thought on solving the C extension problem in MVM? In the present state, I've stopped working on it in Rubinius because there is no workable solution if there are C extensions in the mix.
[#35652] Re: mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/07

Evan Phoenix <evan@fallingsnow.net> wrote:
[#35691] Re: mvm branch status? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/10

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35698] Re: mvm branch status? — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/04/11

Hi,
[#35728] Re: mvm branch status? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/12

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#35730] Re: mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/12

Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#35758] Re: mvm branch status? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/14

Hi,
[#35749] Re: mvm branch status? — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/04/14

Hi,

[#35656] [Backport87 - Backport #4552][Rejected] macaddr-1.0.0 does not read mac address in opensolaris — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/08

[#35659] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4549] Can't start class names with non us-ascii chars — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/08

[#35660] [Ruby - Feature #2350] Unicode specific functionality on String in 1.9 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/08

[#35664] [Backport92 - Backport #4357] Please backport r30629 and r30630 to 1_9_2 — Brendten Eickstaedt <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/08

[#35666] caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Why does Ruby cache the ancestors chain? I mean, not why the implementation implies that, but why it works that way conceptually.

9 messages 2011/04/09
[#35667] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2011/04/09

Ah, in case it is not clear, where I find the metaphor broken is in that you can add methods to a mixin and have them available in classes that already included it, but if you include a new ancestor, then method dispatch in classes that already included the module aren't aware of the new chain.
[#35668] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/09

Hi,
[#35692] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/10

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#35720] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2011/04/12

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#35729] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/12

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:
[#35733] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2011/04/13

What's the downside of the naive implementation?
[#35745] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/13

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:
[#35693] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/10

Hi,

[#35672] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/04/09
[#35809] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/19

Eric Wong <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#35678] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Open] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

8 messages 2011/04/09
[#35863] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Open] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/24

[#35695] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Assigned] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35710] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Closed] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35867] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/04/24

[#35893] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/25

[#36391] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/05/22

[#36394] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/05/22

Hi,

[#35679] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4565][Open] incompatible change at rev.31169 about autoload — Hidetoshi Nagai <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/04/09
[#35696] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4565][Assigned] incompatible change at rev.31169 about autoload — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35810] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4565][Closed] incompatible change at rev.31169 about autoload — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35683] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566][Open] followup of — jojelino lastname <redmine@...>

5 messages 2011/04/10
[#35697] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566] followup of — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35712] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566] followup of — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35770] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566][Assigned] followup of — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#37868] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566][Third Party's Issue] followup of — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/07/08

[#35686] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567][Open] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — redmine@...

5 messages 2011/04/10
[#35688] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567][Assigned] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — redmine@... 2011/04/10

[#37435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#37817] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — Shane Emmons <semmons99@...> 2011/07/05

[#37839] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567][Closed] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/07/07

[#35699] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — redmine@...

4 messages 2011/04/11
[#35700] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/11

Lowering RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64KB across the board in
[#35731] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/12

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#35701] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Closed] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569][Open] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@...

13 messages 2011/04/11
[#35736] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#36260] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — Marco Ceresa <ceresa@...> 2011/05/17

[#48267] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "ceresa@... (Marco Ceresa)" <ceresa@...> 2012/10/25

[#48286] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...> 2012/10/25

[#49944] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569][Closed] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/24

[#36427] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — Marco Ceresa <ceresa@...> 2011/05/24

[#35718] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569][Assigned] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#35721] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#36312] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — Julien A <schmurfy@...> 2011/05/18

[#38874] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — Marco Ceresa <ceresa@...> 2011/08/09

[#48233] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/25

[#48904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "ceresa@... (Marco Ceresa)" <ceresa@...> 2012/11/05

[#35711] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4570][Open] [PATCH v2] io.c (rb_io_close): release GVL if possible — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/11

[#35713] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571][Open] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — redmine@...

5 messages 2011/04/11
[#35719] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571][Assigned] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#36011] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — Tinco Andringa <mail@...> 2011/05/05

[#36012] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/05/05

[#36017] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/05/05

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:31:14AM +0900, Shyouhei Urabe wrote:

[#35714] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/12

[#35717] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4572][Open] URI.encode_www_form_component and decode_www_form_component are not threadsafe — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/12

[#35722] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@...

8 messages 2011/04/12
[#35812] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573][Assigned] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35834] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/20

[#35818] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573][Feedback] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35811] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35824] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/20

[#35826] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/20

[#35837] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573][Closed] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/04/20

[#35723] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4541] Inconsistent Array.slice() — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/12

[#35724] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — redmine@...

2 messages 2011/04/12
[#35727] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — Michael Edgar <adgar@...> 2011/04/12

My one concern about the name #take was that it may imply removal. I was actually

[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...

16 messages 2011/04/13
[#35747] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/14

[#35737] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#35738] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#35740] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/13

Hello,
[#35742] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/04/13

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 14:49, <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#35739] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#35743] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#35744] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/13

Hello,
[#35748] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/14

[#35750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/14

[#35751] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/04/14

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:49, <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#35757] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...> 2011/04/14

On 14/04/2011, at 9:40 PM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#37956] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Assigned] Numeric#within — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/07/10

[#44259] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4574][Rejected] Numeric#within — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...> 2012/04/10

[#66837] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — findchris@... 2014/12/15

Issue #4574 has been updated by Chris Johnson.

[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...

61 messages 2011/04/14
[#35802] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Closed] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@... 2011/04/18

[#35804] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@... 2011/04/18

[#35805] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/04/18

Hello,
[#39511] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39515] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/13

[#39516] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39517] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39520] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/13

[#39521] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Ales Marecek <amarecek@...> 2011/09/13

[#39522] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/09/13

[#39523] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/09/13

[#39526] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/09/13

[#39566] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/15

[#39567] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/09/16

Hi,
[#39569] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/16 Kenta Murata <muraken@gmail.com>:
[#39577] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/09/16

I re-committed as r33285 because
[#39578] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/09/16

PS: I should have modified the commit message to say that this fixes
[#39576] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/09/16

Hi,
[#39582] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/16 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@marc-andre.ca>:
[#39584] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/16

On 16 September 2011 15:49, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#39585] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/16 Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>:
[#39586] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/09/16

Hello,
[#39587] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/16

On 16 September 2011 16:18, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
[#39579] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/09/16

[#39580] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/09/16

[#39581] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/09/16

Hello,
[#39588] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/16

[#39589] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/16

[#40002] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/10/06

[#39198] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/08/30

[#39508] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

Can somebody please reopen this issue? Since the test suite fix is
[#39509] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/13

(09/13/2011 06:56 PM), V咜 Ondruch wrote:
[#39513] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/13

On 13 September 2011 12:28, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#39510] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39524] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/09/13

Hello,
[#39549] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/14

On 13 September 2011 17:19, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
[#39525] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Ales Marecek <amarecek@...> 2011/09/13

[#39518] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/13

[#39519] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39590] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/16

[#39593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@marc-andre.ca>:
[#39595] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/17

2011/9/17 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
[#39602] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/09/17

Hello,
[#39612] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/17

2011/9/17 Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
[#39613] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/18

On 17 September 2011 07:05, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
[#39605] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/17

2011/9/17 Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
[#39604] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/17

(2011/09/17 9:07), Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#39606] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/09/17

Hello,
[#39607] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/17

(2011/09/17 16:14), Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#39608] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/17

I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issue.
[#39637] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/20

2011/9/17 Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@gmail.com>:
[#39655] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/21

2011/9/20 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:
[#39656] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — masa <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/21

I haven't explained the reason of the error estimation in
[#39657] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/21

On 21 September 2011 14:25, masa <masa16.tanaka@gmail.com> wrote:
[#39668] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2011/09/22

A basis that sums to unity reduces error, due to convex hull property:
[#39720] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/26

2011/9/22 Kurt Stephens <ks@kurtstephens.com>:
[#39828] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/10/02

2011/9/17 Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@gmail.com>:
[#39649] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/09/21

[#39741] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/09/27

[#40110] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/10/11

[#35754] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@...

8 messages 2011/04/14
[#35763] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35766] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#37015] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Assigned] (int...float).max should not raise an error — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#35756] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — Masaya TARUI <tarui@...> 2011/04/14

Hi,
[#35760] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/15

Hi,
[#46416] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4577][Rejected] (int...float).max should not raise an error — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...> 2012/07/14

[#48110] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4577] (int...float).max should not raise an error — "elninorian (menuju sukses sukses)" <rian_barkah88@...> 2012/10/19

[#35759] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578][Open] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — redmine@...

6 messages 2011/04/14
[#35906] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — Russell Bevers <rbevers@...> 2011/04/26

[#35761] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35767] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2011/04/15

Isn't technically all Fixnums "frozen" (because you can't modify the state)?
[#35768] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/15

Hi,
[#35819] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/19

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#35762] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4338] random number generator not reseeded after fork in 1.8 — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/15

[#35764] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4338][Assigned] random number generator not reseeded after fork in 1.8 — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/15

[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...

27 messages 2011/04/15
[#35771] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35773] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35774] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35779] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35822] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/20

[#35823] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/20

Hiroshi NAKAMURA wrote:
[#37016] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Assigned] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37030] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/11

[#37073] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/13

Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#37077] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/13

[#37166] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/16

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 17:07, Akira Tanaka <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#37165] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/16

[#37302] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/22

[#37309] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/23

Hi,
[#37318] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/23

[#35769] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35780] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35782] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/16

Hi
[#37024] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/11

[#37053] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/12

[#37058] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/12

[#37064] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/12

[#37072] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/13

[#37119] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Closed] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/13

[#37168] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/06/16

[#37169] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/16

> Hmm, OK. o ahead.

[#35775] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4580][Open] actionpack-3.0.6/lib/action_controller/metal/renderers.rb: 74 SEGFAULT — redmine@...

2 messages 2011/04/15
[#35776] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4580][Third Party's Issue] actionpack-3.0.6/lib/action_controller/metal/renderers.rb: 74 SEGFAULT — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35777] hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello all.

5 messages 2011/04/15
[#35778] Re: hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2011/04/15

Just use a proper hash function (MD5, SHA1)?
[#35784] Re: hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/16

Hello,
[#35803] Re: hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/18

Hi,
[#35835] Re: hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/04/20

> I think it is described in the following page.

[#35781] Patch to Net::HTTP to allow overriding SSL certificate hostname verification — Patrick Higgins <patrick133t@...>

I have a need to connect to an https server using Net::HTTP which

3 messages 2011/04/16
[#35783] Re: Patch to Net::HTTP to allow overriding SSL certificate hostname verification — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/04/16

(2011/04/16 9:21), Patrick Higgins wrote:
[#35820] Re: Patch to Net::HTTP to allow overriding SSL certificate hostname verification — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/04/20

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:21, Patrick Higgins <patrick133t@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#35785] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4581][Open] Documentation for Process.times is outdated — redmine@...

2 messages 2011/04/16
[#36106] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4581] Documentation for Process.times is outdated — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2011/05/11

[#35788] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4582][Open] date_tmx.h file missing — redmine@...

3 messages 2011/04/16
[#35795] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4582] date_tmx.h file missing — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35801] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4582][Closed] date_tmx.h file missing — redmine@... 2011/04/18

[#35790] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583][Open] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@...

11 messages 2011/04/17
[#35796] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#36998] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583][Feedback] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#48570] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4583][Rejected] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/30

[#35792] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35794] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583][Assigned] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35797] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35798] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35799] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35800] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#36928] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583][Open] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,

[#35791] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4584][Open] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@...

2 messages 2011/04/17
[#35793] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4584][Rejected] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35806] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4585][Open] DLEXT in win32/Makefile.sub is not correct for building with VisualStudio 2008 — redmine@...

4 messages 2011/04/18
[#35807] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4585] DLEXT in win32/Makefile.sub is not correct for building with VisualStudio 2008 — redmine@... 2011/04/18

[#35817] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4585][Closed] DLEXT in win32/Makefile.sub is not correct for building with VisualStudio 2008 — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35816] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4585] DLEXT in win32/Makefile.sub is not correct for building with VisualStudio 2008 — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35808] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — program uni <msgintest@...>

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:39 PM, <ruby-core-admin@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

1 message 2011/04/18

[#35813] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/19

[#35814] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/19

[#35815] Missing length check in rb_str_each_line? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

In rb_str_each line, the following test is performed:

1 message 2011/04/19

[#35821] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #435] open-uri.rb 407 Proxy Authentication Required (OpenURI::HTTPError) — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/20

[#35825] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Open] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — redmine@...

4 messages 2011/04/20
[#36016] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/05/05

[#36018] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Closed] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/05/05

[#36022] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Closed] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/05/06

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 01:04, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#35827] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4588][Open] exec(env, cmd) fails in Ruby 1.8; works in 1.9 — redmine@...

3 messages 2011/04/20
[#35836] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4588] exec(env, cmd) fails in Ruby 1.8; works in 1.9 — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...> 2011/04/20

[#38129] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4588][Rejected] exec(env, cmd) fails in Ruby 1.8; works in 1.9 — Akinori MUSHA <knu@...> 2011/07/17

[#35828] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589][Open] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — redmine@...

10 messages 2011/04/20
[#35920] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Charles Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/27

[#38528] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...> 2011/07/26

[#38536] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/07/26

[#38559] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/07/27

On 27/07/11 00:34, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#35941] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/04/28

[#43618] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4589][Assigned] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#48561] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4589][Feedback] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/29

[#48584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4589][Feedback] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2012/10/30

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:44:21AM +0900, ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:
[#79348] [Ruby trunk Feature#4589][Closed] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — ko1@... 2017/01/31

Issue #4589 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.

[#35830] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3436] Spawn the timer thread lazily — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/20

[#35832] How should one use rb_reg_regsub in a library that is ment to be used both from 1.8 and 1.9? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

How should one use rb_reg_regsub in a library that is ment to be used

1 message 2011/04/20

[#35833] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4590][Open] documentation is wrong for srand — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/20

[#35841] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...>

1 message 2011/04/21

[#35842] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4593][Open] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Alex Tambellini <atambellini@...>

4 messages 2011/04/21
[#35846] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4593][Rejected] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/22

[#35843] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4593] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Alex Tambellini <atambellini@...> 2011/04/21

[#35845] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4593] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/22

Hi,

[#35844] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>

1 message 2011/04/21

[#35847] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4594][Open] Don't depend on extension automagic — Nathan McSween <nwmcsween@...>

3 messages 2011/04/22
[#36021] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4594] Don't depend on extension automagic — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/05/06

[#37483] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4594][Rejected] Don't depend on extension automagic — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#35848] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189][Assigned] FileUtils#ln_r — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35849] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35850] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Sakuro OZAWA <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35851] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35852] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Ian Viney <ian@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35853] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4597][Open] YAML doesn't consider tab stops as whitespace in mappings — Dominik Honnef <dominikh@...>

3 messages 2011/04/22
[#35858] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4597][Rejected] YAML doesn't consider tab stops as whitespace in mappings — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/23

[#35855] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4597] YAML doesn't consider tab stops as whitespace in mappings — Dominik Honnef <dominikh@...> 2011/04/22

[#35854] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4598][Open] Net::SMTP should raise more helpfully when mail can't send — Tyler Kieft <tyler.kieft@...>

3 messages 2011/04/22
[#44551] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4598] Net::SMTP should raise more helpfully when mail can't send — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/04/23

[#43619] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4598][Assigned] Net::SMTP should raise more helpfully when mail can't send — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#35856] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35857] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

2 messages 2011/04/22
[#35859] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/23

Hi,

[#35860] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4600][Open] date/date_parse.c errors are breaking MinGW build — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

4 messages 2011/04/23
[#35872] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4600][Assigned] date/date_parse.c errors are breaking MinGW build — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#36055] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4600][Closed] date/date_parse.c errors are breaking MinGW build — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2011/05/09

[#36057] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4600] date/date_parse.c errors are breaking MinGW build — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/05/09

[#35861] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4601][Open] Re-ordering method parameters. — Nicos Gollan <gtdev@...>

6 messages 2011/04/23
[#43691] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4601][Closed] Re-ordering method parameters. — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/26

[#35880] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4601] Re-ordering method parameters. — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/04/25

[#35888] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4601] Re-ordering method parameters. — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2011/04/25

[#35905] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4601] Re-ordering method parameters. — Nicos Gollan <gtdev@...> 2011/04/26

[#43620] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4601][Assigned] Re-ordering method parameters. — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#35862] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

1 message 2011/04/23

[#35864] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539] Array#zip_with — Jeremy Voorhis <jvoorhis@...>

1 message 2011/04/24

[#35865] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4102] Proposal for 'let'. A new approach using block-defaults in 1.9 — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>

2 messages 2011/04/24
[#35868] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4102] Proposal for 'let'. A new approach using block-defaults in 1.9 — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2011/04/24

You can use begin/end-blocks or #tap:

[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>

13 messages 2011/04/24
[#35871] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Assigned] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#35873] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — James Gray <james@...> 2011/04/25

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:33 AM, yu nobuoka <nobuoka@r-definition.com>wrote:
[#35875] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/04/25

2011/4/25 James Gray <james@graysoftinc.com>:
[#35878] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — James Gray <james@...> 2011/04/25

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:29 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#35907] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/26

Hi,
[#35908] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — James Gray <james@...> 2011/04/26

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>wrote:
[#35876] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#35911] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...> 2011/04/26

[#35912] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — James Gray <james@...> 2011/04/26

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:13 PM, yu nobuoka <nobuoka@r-definition.com>wrote:
[#44981] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — "theirishpenguin (Declan McGrath)" <declanmg@...> 2012/05/10

[#44984] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — "naruse (Yui NARUSE)" <naruse@...> 2012/05/10

[#44995] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — "theirishpenguin (Declan McGrath)" <declanmg@...> 2012/05/11

[#35869] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608][Open] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Roman Ralovets <roman@...>

5 messages 2011/04/24
[#35882] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Roman Ralovets <roman@...> 2011/04/25

[#36002] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Jason Earl <jason@...> 2011/05/04

[#36760] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608][Third Party's Issue] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/05

[#35903] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Mr Corn <kontakt+ruby-lang@...> 2011/04/26

[#35870] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Johan Holmberg <johan556@...>

1 message 2011/04/24

[#35874] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4609][Open] String#rpartition(regexp) has bug, when regexp contains quantifier — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

3 messages 2011/04/25
[#35928] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4609][Rejected] String#rpartition(regexp) has bug, when regexp contains quantifier — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/27

[#35927] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4609] String#rpartition(regexp) has bug, when regexp contains quantifier — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...> 2011/04/27

[#35877] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3719] open-uri should allow redirects from http to https — Joseph Holsten <joseph@...>

1 message 2011/04/25

[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>

11 messages 2011/04/25
[#35885] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2011/04/25

[#35892] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/04/25

[#35904] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/26

Hello,
[#35914] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/04/26

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
[#43621] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610][Assigned] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#44072] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610][Rejected] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/04/02

[#44104] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/04/03

[#35881] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/04/25

[#43622] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "mrkn (Kenta Murata)" <muraken@...> 2012/03/25

[#44099] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "jballanc (Joshua Ballanco)" <jballanc@...> 2012/04/03

[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>

15 messages 2011/04/25
[#37484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Assigned] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#38047] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Feedback] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/07/13

[#35884] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#35886] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Feedback] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/04/25

[#37555] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Feedback] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/27

Hi,
[#37566] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Feedback] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/27

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:32, Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35887] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/04/25

[#35889] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#35890] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#36632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Peter Bell <peter@...> 2011/05/31

[#37140] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Ruan Carlos <ruanltbg@...> 2011/06/14

[#37494] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#38065] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Piotr Panasewicz <piotr.panasewicz@...> 2011/07/14

[#38074] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/07/15

[#35891] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4612][Open] Segmentation fault in fiber GC mark cycle — Serge Balyuk <serge@...>

4 messages 2011/04/25
[#36136] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4612] Segmentation fault in fiber GC mark cycle — Serge Balyuk <serge@...> 2011/05/12

[#36104] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4612] Segmentation fault in fiber GC mark cycle — Serge Balyuk <serge@...> 2011/05/11

[#36105] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4612] Segmentation fault in fiber GC mark cycle — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2011/05/11

[#35894] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613][Open] define_method lacks trace events — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>

5 messages 2011/04/25
[#36929] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613][Open] define_method lacks trace events — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36930] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613] define_method lacks trace events — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/10

[#37495] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613][Assigned] define_method lacks trace events — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#37689] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613][Closed] define_method lacks trace events — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/30

[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2011/04/25
[#36931] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/10

[#36997] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/11

Koichi Sasada <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#48352] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614][Feedback] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/26

[#48419] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614][Feedback] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/10/27

"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#50990] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/12/19

[#51169] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/12/28

"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#52187] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614][Closed] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2013/02/13

[#50124] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/11/26

[#49936] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/24

[#35896] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615][Open] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

8 messages 2011/04/26
[#35898] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615][Assigned] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/26

[#35901] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/26

[#35918] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...> 2011/04/27

[#35930] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...> 2011/04/27

[#35931] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/27

[#35919] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/27

[#35929] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615][Rejected] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/27

[#35897] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4491] Some methods of Dir/File do not encode dirname/filename transparently — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35899] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4368] MiniTest::Assertions#assert_block ignores the given message. — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35900] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4368] MiniTest::Assertions#assert_block ignores the given message. — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35902] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4491][Assigned] Some methods of Dir/File do not encode dirname/filename transparently — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35909] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4617][Open] incorrect RbConfig::CONFIG["STRIP"] values — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/04/26
[#35932] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4617] incorrect RbConfig::CONFIG["STRIP"] values — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/04/27

[#35910] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4266] Timeouts in threads cause "ThreadError: deadlock; recursive locking" — Brian Gugliemetti <briangug@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35913] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4618][Open] Encoding::ConverterNotFoundErrors on trunk (Windows mingw) — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/04/26
[#35939] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4618][Assigned] Encoding::ConverterNotFoundErrors on trunk (Windows mingw) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2011/04/28

[#35973] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4618] Encoding::ConverterNotFoundErrors on trunk (Windows mingw) — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/05/02

[#35915] license change? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

We changed to BSD + ruby for 1.9.2, or was it for 1.9.3?

2 messages 2011/04/27
[#35917] Re: license change? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/04/27

2011/4/27 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:

[#35916] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/27

[#35921] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

1 message 2011/04/27

[#35922] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

1 message 2011/04/27

[#35923] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Open] NilClass#to_hash — Tsuyoshi Sawada <sawadatsuyoshi@...>

4 messages 2011/04/27
[#35924] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Assigned] NilClass#to_hash — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/27

[#35925] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Assigned] NilClass#to_hash — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/27

Hi,
[#35926] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Rejected] NilClass#to_hash — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/27

[#35933] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Open] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Alex Neth <alex@...>

7 messages 2011/04/27
[#35945] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Alex Neth <alex@...> 2011/04/29

[#37002] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37037] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/06/11

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 04:30:37PM +0900, Koichi Sasada wrote:
[#37485] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Assigned] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#37496] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Feedback] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#51679] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4623][Rejected] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/01/25

[#35934] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...>

1 message 2011/04/28

[#35935] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

1 message 2011/04/28

[#35936] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4491] Some methods of Dir/File do not encode dirname/filename transparently — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/28

[#35938] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4491] Some methods of Dir/File do not encode dirname/filename transparently — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/28

[#35940] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4630][Open] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — Elise Huard <ruby@...>

6 messages 2011/04/28
[#37006] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4630][Assigned] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37497] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4630] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#79349] [Ruby trunk Bug#4630][Closed] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — ko1@... 2017/01/31

Issue #4630 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#50125] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4630] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/11/26

[#36933] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4630][Open] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,

[#35942] change in timeout error — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello. Sorry if this is a repeat...

4 messages 2011/04/29
[#36944] Re: change in timeout error — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36954] Re: change in timeout error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/11

Hi,
[#35957] Re: change in timeout error — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/30

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:

[#35943] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>

3 messages 2011/04/29
[#35952] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/29

Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#36091] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/10

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:

[#35944] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>

1 message 2011/04/29

[#35946] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4632][Open] Regexp instance method | for creating Regexp.unions — Jan Lelis <mail@...>

4 messages 2011/04/29
[#35950] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4632][Rejected] Regexp instance method | for creating Regexp.unions — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/04/29

[#35951] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4632] Regexp instance method | for creating Regexp.unions — Jan Lelis <mail@...> 2011/04/29

[#35948] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4632][Open] Regexp instance method | for creating Regexp.unions — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/04/29

I like it for Regexp, but a string method would violate the POLS, imho.

[#35947] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4633][Open] iterate method / extended version of for — Jan Lelis <mail@...>

3 messages 2011/04/29
[#46191] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4633][Rejected] iterate method / extended version of for — "tarui (Masaya Tarui)" <tarui@...> 2012/07/05

[#43623] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4633][Assigned] iterate method / extended version of for — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#35949] [Backport92 - Backport #4634][Open] Segmentation fault on marshal_dump — Anton Sozontov <a.sozontov@...>

3 messages 2011/04/29
[#35967] [Backport92 - Backport #4634] Segmentation fault on marshal_dump — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2011/05/01

[#36605] [Backport92 - Backport #4634][Rejected] Segmentation fault on marshal_dump — Yuki Sonoda <yugui@...> 2011/05/31

[#35953] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2190]FileUtils::chmod - allow symbolic mode — ted cooper <anthezium@...>

1 message 2011/04/29

[#35955] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2190][Assigned]FileUtils::chmod - allow symbolic mode — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>

1 message 2011/04/29

[ruby-core:35693] Re: caching of the ancestor chain

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2011-04-10 23:15:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #35693 
Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:35692] Re: caching of the ancestor chain"
    on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:08:24 +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> writes:

|What's actually slow about this? JRuby caches nothing but runs the
|following benchmark 3x faster than 1.9.2p160 (and it's not Ruby
|execution performance):

CRuby does not cache neither.  It's matter of how modules store mixin
information.  Currently mixin inserts hidden class into the class
hierarchy.  Since CRuby does not have reverse reference to the
subclasses, there's no easy way to update the inserted hidden class
when #include is called on an already included module.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next