[ruby-core:28845] Re: [Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library

On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Yui NARUSE wrote:

> This ticket doesn't have:
> * Who maintain it

Florian has offered to do it:

On Nov 8, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Florian Gilcher wrote:

> To add to that: I also contacted the maintainer of RBTree to
> inform him of my patches and to ask for his thoughts. As the
> library is of good-quality and fitted with a good test suite,
> I would also  volunteer to maintain it, but I want to wait
> for an answer first.
> 
> Regards,
> Florian Gilcher

> * Sufficient reason to bundle

I thought you made a very good case for it when we were discussing it before:

On Nov 7, 2009, at 2:30 PM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

> But it really a library for libraries;
> abundled library, SortedSet, uses it.
> 
> Moreover to bundle such data structure library encourages Ruby users
> to use appropriate data structure.
> For example, people who should use RBTree,
> but they are just about to play with Hash and Array.
> # bundled library by political reason
> 
> If someone has responsibility for bundled RBTree in 1.9,
> I agree with it.


James Edward Gray II