[#28687] [Bug #2973] rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213 — rudolf gavlas <redmine@...>

Bug #2973: rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213

10 messages 2010/03/16

[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline

16 messages 2010/03/18

[#28736] [Bug #2983] Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3) — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2983: Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3)

10 messages 2010/03/18

[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults

19 messages 2010/03/23

[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>

Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0

10 messages 2010/03/24

[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>

Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1

15 messages 2010/03/24

[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych

10 messages 2010/03/31

[ruby-core:28560] Re: [Feature #1081] add File::write() convenience method

From: Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Date: 2010-03-08 15:22:59 UTC
List: ruby-core #28560
Hi,

2010/3/6 Run Paint Run Run <runrun@runpaint.org>:
>> I give up. I have already reverted and deleted the two methods.
>>
>> I wrote the patch because I thought closing the ticket encourages 1.9.2
>> release.
>> But it seems to take some time to make the feature stable, and I became
>> afraid that it may delay the release. ?It is never the effect I expected.
>>
>> I think refactoring io.c is needed to implement the feature.
>> open argument is easy to use, but difficult for me to implement :-(
>
> Why don't we just start simple?

Because there are already complex File.read/binread.
It is confusing to make File.write/binwrite inconsistent with them.


> That covers the common use case which inspired
> this ticket, and allows the optional arguments to be added later
> without breaking compatibility.

There is no reason to rush into 1.9.2.

-- 
Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>

In This Thread