[#23457] [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1471: "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7

17 messages 2009/05/15

[#23483] [Bug #1478] Ruby archive — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1478: Ruby archive

29 messages 2009/05/16
[#29225] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#30345] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/05/21

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 17:13, Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#30346] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

> Thanks for your comment.

[#30347] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

OK Hiroshi, I read some of the comments earlier in the thread that I

[#30355] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/21

On 5/20/10, Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@jmnet.us> wrote:

[#30364] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

Hi,

[#23505] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nicholas Manning <redmine@...>

Bug #1494: tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows

19 messages 2009/05/19

[#23572] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #1525: Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?

27 messages 2009/05/27

[#23595] Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>

The RUBY_PLATFORM constant is documented in the latest Pickaxe as "The

17 messages 2009/05/28
[#23596] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23602] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23608] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23609] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[ruby-core:23651] [Bug #1548] Segfault when Transferring to a Fiber which Resumes Itself

From: Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-05-31 21:16:20 UTC
List: ruby-core #23651
Bug #1548: Segfault when Transferring to a Fiber which Resumes Itself
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1548

Author: Run Paint Run Run
Status: Open, Priority: High
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-05-28 trunk 23601) [i686-linux]

On both the trunk version and 1.9.1 I can reproduce a segfault by transferring to a Fiber from the root Fiber, when the former attempts to resume itself. Both stack traces below were generated from binaries I compiled myself using the default flags.

  $ rubybleed -rfiber -e 'f=Fiber.new{f.resume};f.transfer'
  [BUG] Segmentation fault
  ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-05-28 trunk 23601) [i686-linux]

  -- control frame ----------
  c:0001 p:---- s:0001 b:-001 l:000000 d:000000 ------
  ---------------------------
  
  -- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
  rubybleed(rb_vm_bugreport+0xb5) [0x8160615]
  rubybleed [0x819b51b]
  rubybleed(rb_bug+0x28) [0x819b5a8]
  rubybleed [0x80f5645]
  [0xb7f04410]
  rubybleed [0x805f0c1]
  rubybleed [0x805f503]
  rubybleed [0x819bae5]
  rubybleed(rb_fiber_transfer+0xfb) [0x816934b]
  rubybleed(rb_fiber_start+0x147) [0x81694b7]
  rubybleed [0x805cfde]
  rubybleed(ruby_run_node+0x46) [0x805e8a6]
  rubybleed(main+0x60) [0x805c3d0]
  /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5) [0xb7d25775]
  rubybleed [0x805c2d1]

  [NOTE]
  You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries.
  Bug reports are welcome.
  For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html

  Aborted


  $ ruby91 -rfiber -e 'f=Fiber.new{f.resume};f.transfer'
  [BUG] Segmentation fault
  ruby 1.9.1p154 (2009-05-22 revision 23541) [i686-linux]

  -- control frame ----------
  c:0001 p:---- s:0001 b:-001 l:000000 d:000000 ------
  ---------------------------
  -- Ruby level backtrace information-----------------------------------------

  -- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
  0x812d908 ruby91(rb_vm_bugreport+0x48) [0x812d908]
  0x815bed1 ruby91 [0x815bed1]
  0x815bf48 ruby91(rb_bug+0x28) [0x815bf48]
  0x80d90b6 ruby91 [0x80d90b6]
  0xb8048410 [0xb8048410]
  0x805cd49 ruby91 [0x805cd49]
  0x805d113 ruby91 [0x805d113]
  0x815b2bf ruby91 [0x815b2bf]
  0x8133dcb ruby91(rb_fiber_transfer+0xfb) [0x8133dcb]
  0x8133f9b ruby91(rb_fiber_start+0x14b) [0x8133f9b]
  0x805d386 ruby91 [0x805d386]
  0x805e8a6 ruby91(ruby_run_node+0x46) [0x805e8a6]
  0x805bea0 ruby91(main+0x60) [0x805bea0]
  0xb7e69775 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5) [0xb7e69775]
  0x805bda1 ruby91 [0x805bda1]

  [NOTE]
  You may encounter a bug of Ruby interpreter. Bug reports are welcome.
  For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html

  Aborted


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next