[#23457] [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1471: "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7

17 messages 2009/05/15

[#23483] [Bug #1478] Ruby archive — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1478: Ruby archive

29 messages 2009/05/16
[#29225] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#30345] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/05/21

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 17:13, Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#30346] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

> Thanks for your comment.

[#30347] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

OK Hiroshi, I read some of the comments earlier in the thread that I

[#30355] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/21

On 5/20/10, Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@jmnet.us> wrote:

[#30364] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

Hi,

[#23505] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nicholas Manning <redmine@...>

Bug #1494: tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows

19 messages 2009/05/19

[#23572] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #1525: Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?

27 messages 2009/05/27

[#23595] Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>

The RUBY_PLATFORM constant is documented in the latest Pickaxe as "The

17 messages 2009/05/28
[#23596] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23602] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23608] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23609] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[ruby-core:23601] [Bug #1533] Inconsistency Between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect

From: Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-05-28 21:15:16 UTC
List: ruby-core #23601
Bug #1533: Inconsistency Between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1533

Author: Run Paint Run Run
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]

There is an inconsistency between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect with respect to recursive data structures. For example:

    $ ruby -v -e 'x={};x[0]=x;p x.to_s'
    ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]
    "{0=>{0=>{...}}}"
 
    $ ruby -v -e 'x={};x[0]=x;p x.inspect'
    ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]
    "{0=>{...}}"
 
    $ ruby1.8 -v -e 'x={};x[0]=x;p x.to_s'
    ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i486-linux]
    "0{...}"
 
 
    $ ruby1.8 -v -e 'x={};x[0]=x;p x.inspect'
    ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i486-linux]
    "{0=>{...}}"

ujihisa noticed that it was caused by a similar issue to the bug he reported in http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1427 . He produced a patch in less time than it took me to type this report, which I have attached. He provides the following demonstration of its result:

    #!./ruby -v
    # ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-05-28 trunk 23601) [i386-darwin9.7.0]
    x = {}
    x[0] = x
    puts x.to_s #=> {0=>{0=>{...}}}
    puts x.inspect #=> {0=>{...}}
 
    # After the patch:
 
    puts x.to_s #=> {0=>{...}}
    puts x.inspect #=> {0=>{...}}

Thanks!


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next