[#23457] [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1471: "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7

17 messages 2009/05/15

[#23483] [Bug #1478] Ruby archive — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1478: Ruby archive

29 messages 2009/05/16
[#29225] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#30345] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/05/21

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 17:13, Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#30346] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

> Thanks for your comment.

[#30347] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

OK Hiroshi, I read some of the comments earlier in the thread that I

[#30355] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/21

On 5/20/10, Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@jmnet.us> wrote:

[#30364] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

Hi,

[#23505] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nicholas Manning <redmine@...>

Bug #1494: tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows

19 messages 2009/05/19

[#23572] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #1525: Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?

27 messages 2009/05/27

[#23595] Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>

The RUBY_PLATFORM constant is documented in the latest Pickaxe as "The

17 messages 2009/05/28
[#23596] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23602] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23608] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23609] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[ruby-core:23559] [Bug #1517] Matrix[] Performs No Argument Validation, Confusing Some of Its Instance Methods

From: Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-05-26 00:54:33 UTC
List: ruby-core #23559
Bug #1517: Matrix[] Performs No Argument Validation, Confusing Some of Its Instance Methods
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1517

Author: Run Paint Run Run
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.0 (2008-06-20 revision 17482) [i486-linux]

The Matrix[] constructor accepts anything as argument. This can cause problems for its instance methods. For example, consider a Fixnum:

    >> m = Matrix[1]
    => Matrix[1]

This works as you'd expect. But then:

    >> m.row(0)
    TypeError: can't dup Fixnum
	from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/matrix.rb:1132:in `dup'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/matrix.rb:1132:in `init_elements'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/matrix.rb:1124:in `initialize'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/matrix.rb:1117:in `new'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/matrix.rb:1117:in `elements'
	from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/matrix.rb:303:in `row'
	from (irb):20
	from /usr/bin/irb1.9:12:in `<main>'

Or:

    >> m.column_size
    => 4

Which leads to:

    >> m.column_vectors
    => [Vector[1], Vector[0], Vector[0], Vector[0]]

If such arguments are accepted, Matrix should coerce them into a matrix. Presumably, the easiest approach would be to have Matrix[1] == Matrix[[1]]. Otherwise, Matrix[] should raise an ArgumentError if it doesn't receive an Array. Ideally, you should only be able to create matrices of Arrays of Numeric-like objects. The current behaviour is non-intuitive, and invites bugs.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next