[#23457] [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1471: "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7

17 messages 2009/05/15

[#23483] [Bug #1478] Ruby archive — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1478: Ruby archive

29 messages 2009/05/16
[#29225] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#30345] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/05/21

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 17:13, Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#30346] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

> Thanks for your comment.

[#30347] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

OK Hiroshi, I read some of the comments earlier in the thread that I

[#30355] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/21

On 5/20/10, Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@jmnet.us> wrote:

[#30364] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

Hi,

[#23505] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nicholas Manning <redmine@...>

Bug #1494: tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows

19 messages 2009/05/19

[#23572] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #1525: Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?

27 messages 2009/05/27

[#23595] Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>

The RUBY_PLATFORM constant is documented in the latest Pickaxe as "The

17 messages 2009/05/28
[#23596] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23602] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23608] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23609] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[ruby-core:23572] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?

From: Hongli Lai <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-05-27 16:44:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #23572
Bug #1525: Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1525

Author: Hongli Lai
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i386-darwin9.6.0]

The following code seems to cause a VM-wide deadlock on 1.9:

  require 'thread'
  
  lock = Mutex.new
  cond = ConditionVariable.new
  t = Thread.new do
  	lock.synchronize do
  		cond.wait(lock)
  	end
  end
  
  pid = fork do
  	# Child
  	STDOUT.write "This is the child process.\n"
  	STDOUT.write "Child process exiting.\n"
  end
  STDOUT.write("Child PID = #{pid}\n")
  Process.waitpid(pid)



The expected output is:

  Child PID = xxxx
  This is the child process.
  Child process exiting.

After the exit message, Ruby should exit.

Instead, Ruby 1.9 gives:

  Child PID = 15493
  This is the child process.
  (process hangs here)

Ruby 1.8 does not suffer from this problem.

Upon debugging Ruby, I've found that Ruby is stuck in blocking_region_end(), at the following line:

  native_mutex_lock(&th->vm->global_vm_lock);

blocking_region_end() was called as part of rb_write_internal(), right after writing "This is the child process\n" to stdout. This problem only occurs if there's a background thread that's waiting on a ConditionVariable. If you remove the thread then the deadlock does not occur.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next