[#23457] [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1471: "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7

17 messages 2009/05/15

[#23483] [Bug #1478] Ruby archive — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1478: Ruby archive

29 messages 2009/05/16
[#29225] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#30345] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/05/21

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 17:13, Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#30346] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

> Thanks for your comment.

[#30347] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

OK Hiroshi, I read some of the comments earlier in the thread that I

[#30355] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/21

On 5/20/10, Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@jmnet.us> wrote:

[#30364] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

Hi,

[#23505] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nicholas Manning <redmine@...>

Bug #1494: tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows

19 messages 2009/05/19

[#23572] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #1525: Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?

27 messages 2009/05/27

[#23595] Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>

The RUBY_PLATFORM constant is documented in the latest Pickaxe as "The

17 messages 2009/05/28
[#23596] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23602] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23608] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23609] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[ruby-core:23501] [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0

From: Paul Harris <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-05-19 09:58:21 UTC
List: ruby-core #23501
Bug #1490: DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1490

Author: Paul Harris
Status: Open, Priority: High
ruby -v: ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-13 patchlevel 0) [i386-mswin32]

eg,
DateTime::civil(2009,5,5,10,11,59+Rational(1,10**3))

this should give
2009-05-05 10:11:59.001

but instead it throws 'invalid date'

the code in ruby 1.8 date.rb:
  def self.valid_time? (h, min, s)
    h   += 24 if h   < 0
    min += 60 if min < 0
    s   += 60 if s   < 0
    return unless ((0..23) === h &&
		   (0..59) === min &&
		   (0..59) === s) ||
		  (24 == h &&
		    0 == min &&
		    0 == s)
    time_to_day_fraction(h, min, s)
  end

should have seconds test changed to s >= 0 && s < 60) ||

and thus, should read:

  def self.valid_time? (h, min, s)
    h   += 24 if h   < 0
    min += 60 if min < 0
    s   += 60 if s   < 0
    return unless ((0..23) === h &&
		   (0..59) === min &&
		   s >= 0 && s < 60) ||
		  (24 == h &&
		    0 == min &&
		    0 == s)
    time_to_day_fraction(h, min, s)
  end


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next