ruby-core

Mailing list archive

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

[#23346] [Bug #1428] Net/http issue — Emmanuel Pinault <redmine@...>

Bug #1428: Net/http issue

3 messages 2009/05/01
[#25666] [Bug #1428](Feedback) Net/http issue — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/09/20

Issue #1428 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#23440] Re: [Bug #1428] Net/http issue — mathew <meta@...> 2009/05/13

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 15:41, Emmanuel Pinault <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrot=

[#23350] [Bug #1430] make check error — Ron Askew <redmine@...>

Bug #1430: make check error

2 messages 2009/05/03
[#23351] [Bug #1430](Rejected) make check error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/05/03

Issue #1430 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23352] [PATCH] Fixing poor performance with --enable-pthread on Ruby 1.8 — Joe Damato <ice799@...>

Hi -

1 message 2009/05/04

[#23354] Ruby/DL Documentation — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Hello,=0A=0A=0Arecently i have been trying to learn and use dl library. whi=

4 messages 2009/05/04
[#23356] R辿f. : [ruby-core:23354] Ruby/DL Documentation — tad.bochan@... 2009/05/04

[#23359] Re: Ruby/DL Documentation — sh@... 2009/05/05

Hi,
[#23371] Re: Ruby/DL Documentation — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...> 2009/05/06

thanks a lot tad.bochan@bnpparibas.com and sh@sheepman.sakura.ne.jp=0A=0Ata=

[#23355] [Feature #1431] Object#__class__ — Sven Schwyn <redmine@...>

Feature #1431: Object#__class__

2 messages 2009/05/04
[#25639] [Feature #1431] Object#__class__ — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/18

Issue #1431 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23357] [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Feature #1432: decrement and increment

8 messages 2009/05/04
[#23403] [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/09

Issue #1432 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23405] Re: [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2009/05/09

Roger Pack wrote:
[#23409] Re: [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/09

Hi,
[#23413] Re: [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Daniel Luz <dev@...> 2009/05/09

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 08:42, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote=
[#23358] [Feature #1432](Rejected) decrement and increment — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/05/04

Issue #1432 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#23363] [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/06

Issue #1432 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23364] Re: [Feature #1432] decrement and increment — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/05/06

[#23361] [Feature #1436] Please consider this addition to resolv.rb which adds methods for resolving LOC resources — JB Smith <redmine@...>

Feature #1436: Please consider this addition to resolv.rb which adds methods for resolving LOC resources

2 messages 2009/05/05
[#29032] Re: [Feature #1436] Please consider this addition to resolv.rb which adds methods for resolving LOC resources — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/03/26

Hi, akr

[#23366] [Bug #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Matthias Marschall <redmine@...>

Bug #1437: 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris

7 messages 2009/05/06
[#23368] [Bug #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Matthias Marschall <redmine@...> 2009/05/06

Issue #1437 has been updated by Matthias Marschall.
[#23369] [Bug #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Matthias Marschall <redmine@...> 2009/05/06

Issue #1437 has been updated by Matthias Marschall.
[#23370] [Backport #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/06

Issue #1437 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23392] [Backport #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Konstantinos Pachnis <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1437 has been updated by Konstantinos Pachnis.
[#23688] [Backport #1437] 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1437 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#24986] [Backport #1437](Closed) 1.8.7-p160 compilation with CC fails on OpenSolaris — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2009/08/20

Issue #1437 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#23372] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Matthew Moss <redmine@...>

Bug #1438: dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6

6 messages 2009/05/06
[#23375] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Matthew Moss <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1438 has been updated by Matthew Moss.
[#23377] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Matthew Moss <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1438 has been updated by Matthew Moss.
[#23380] Re: [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/07

Hi,
[#23393] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Matthew Moss <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1438 has been updated by Matthew Moss.
[#23373] [Bug #1438] dylib architecture error building 1.9.1-rc2 on osx10.5.6 — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1438 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.

[#23374] [Bug #1439] Array#sample returns wrong results for negative argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1439: Array#sample returns wrong results for negative argument

2 messages 2009/05/07
[#23379] [Bug #1439](Closed) Array#sample returns wrong results for negative argument — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1439 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23382] [Bug #1440] Array#flatten!(0) should return nil, not self — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1440: Array#flatten!(0) should return nil, not self

2 messages 2009/05/07
[#23385] [Bug #1440](Closed) Array#flatten!(0) should return nil, not self — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1440 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23386] [Bug #1441] String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly — "shawn ." <redmine@...>

Bug #1441: String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly

2 messages 2009/05/07
[#23387] [Bug #1441](Rejected) String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #1441 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23389] [Bug #1443] String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly — shawn landen <redmine@...>

Bug #1443: String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly

2 messages 2009/05/07
[#23390] Re: [Bug #1443] String#gsub handles backslashes incorrectly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/07

Hi,

[#23391] [Bug #1444] Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Konstantinos Pachnis <redmine@...>

Bug #1444: Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6

5 messages 2009/05/07
[#23399] [Bug #1444] Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Daniel Berger <redmine@...> 2009/05/08

Issue #1444 has been updated by Daniel Berger.
[#23400] Re: [Bug #1444] Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/08

Hi,
[#23394] [Bug #1444](Closed) Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/08

Issue #1444 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23421] [Bug #1444] Building ruby 1.8.7 p160 on Solaris 10 u6 — Daniel Berger <redmine@...> 2009/05/11

Issue #1444 has been updated by Daniel Berger.

[#23395] [Bug #1445] win32 debug build broken — James Hughes <redmine@...>

Bug #1445: win32 debug build broken

3 messages 2009/05/08
[#23396] [Backport #1445](Assigned) win32 debug build broken — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/08

Issue #1445 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#24845] [Backport #1445] win32 debug build broken — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/08/09

Issue #1445 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23402] [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1448: [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays

6 messages 2009/05/09
[#23406] Re: [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/09

Hi,
[#23412] [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/05/09

Issue #1448 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#23463] Re: [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/15

Hi,
[#23539] [Bug #1448](Closed) [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/24

Issue #1448 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23536] [Bug #1448] [patch] Proper handling of recursive arrays — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/05/23

Issue #1448 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23404] [Bug #1449] [REXML] detected encoding isn't used correctly — Kouhei Sutou <redmine@...>

Bug #1449: [REXML] detected encoding isn't used correctly

2 messages 2009/05/09
[#29510] [Bug #1449](Closed) [REXML] detected encoding isn't used correctly — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #1449 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23407] ruby-ffi problem — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Hello,=0A=0AI am trying to learn ruby-ffi now (after sadly leaving dl libra=

3 messages 2009/05/09
[#23410] Re: ruby-ffi problem — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/09

You probably want to take this to the ruby-ffi project here:
[#23414] Re: ruby-ffi problem — Hirotsugu Asari <asari.ruby@...> 2009/05/09

If you want to change the string value of a field in a struct through

[#23415] [Bug #1454] compatability of rational and bigdecimal (1.8 and 1.9) — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...>

Bug #1454: compatability of rational and bigdecimal (1.8 and 1.9)

2 messages 2009/05/10
[#23417] [Bug #1454] compatability of rational and bigdecimal (1.8 and 1.9) — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...> 2009/05/10

Issue #1454 has been updated by Karl Brodowsky.

[#23416] [Bug #1455] compatability of rational and bigdecimal — Karl Brodowsky <redmine@...>

Bug #1455: compatability of rational and bigdecimal

2 messages 2009/05/10
[#24315] [Bug #1455](Closed) compatability of rational and bigdecimal — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/13

Issue #1455 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23422] [Bug #1457] Some grammar rules not terminated with semicolon; — Dave B <redmine@...>

Bug #1457: Some grammar rules not terminated with semicolon;

2 messages 2009/05/11
[#23428] [Bug #1457](Closed) Some grammar rules not terminated with semicolon; — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/05/11

Issue #1457 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23429] [Bug #1388] cygwin-1.7, gcc4-4.3, and ruby-1.9. make btest #236 test_io.rb Segmentation fault — neomjp neomjp <redmine@...>

Issue #1388 has been updated by neomjp neomjp.

1 message 2009/05/11

[#23430] [Bug #1459] x64-mswin64 ruby 1.9 binary package lack zlib.dll — Szilárd Zsolt Sztupák <redmine@...>

Bug #1459: x64-mswin64 ruby 1.9 binary package lack zlib.dll

1 message 2009/05/11

[#23431] [Bug #1460] IO#select returns wrong fd list after Kernel#sleep (Windows) — Romulo Ceccon <redmine@...>

Bug #1460: IO#select returns wrong fd list after Kernel#sleep (Windows)

2 messages 2009/05/11
[#23432] [Bug #1460](Assigned) IO#select returns wrong fd list after Kernel#sleep (Windows) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/12

Issue #1460 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23442] [Bug #1465] debug segmentation fault when starting RoR Webrick server — Jakub Kuźma <redmine@...>

Bug #1465: debug segmentation fault when starting RoR Webrick server

1 message 2009/05/13

[#23443] [Bug #1466] URI#parse fails on some working urls — Osama brekaa <redmine@...>

Bug #1466: URI#parse fails on some working urls

4 messages 2009/05/13
[#23447] Re: [Bug #1466] URI#parse fails on some working urls — danielcavanagh@... 2009/05/14

> i tried this snippet of code
[#23486] [Bug #1466] URI#parse fails on some working urls — Daniel Cavanagh <redmine@...> 2009/05/17

Issue #1466 has been updated by Daniel Cavanagh.
[#25665] [Bug #1466](Rejected) URI#parse fails on some working urls — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/09/20

Issue #1466 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#23444] [Bug #1467] Why doesn Ruby not use all cores on a Nehalem box (MacPro)? — Philipp Ringli <redmine@...>

Bug #1467: Why doesn Ruby not use all cores on a Nehalem box (MacPro)?

3 messages 2009/05/13
[#23445] Re: [Bug #1467] Why doesn Ruby not use all cores on a Nehalem box (MacPro)? — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...> 2009/05/13

On Thu, 14 May 2009 00:18:35 +0900
[#29140] [Feature #1467](Feedback) Why doesn Ruby not use all cores on a Nehalem box (MacPro)? — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1467 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23446] Some expect.rb miprovements — Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...>

Hello,

1 message 2009/05/13

[#23448] Fwd: Bug report involving class variables — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Can we get the redmine issues fixed?

1 message 2009/05/14

[#23449] Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>

Hi there,

5 messages 2009/05/14
[#23454] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/15

Hi,
[#23458] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/05/15

2009/5/15 Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>:
[#23462] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — daz <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2009/05/15

Robert Klemme wrote:
[#23478] Re: Submit bugs against 1.9.1? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/05/16

2009/5/15 daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk>:

[#23450] where are the grammar bits? — Erik Scheirer <e@...>

HI everyone -

2 messages 2009/05/14
[#23451] Re: where are the grammar bits? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/14

Excerpts from Erik Scheirer's message of Thu May 14 18:12:33 +0300 2009:

[#23452] [Bug #1469] Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129 — Kenneth Ballou <redmine@...>

Bug #1469: Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129

4 messages 2009/05/14
[#23453] Re: [Bug #1469] Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/14

Kenneth Ballou wrote:
[#27611] [Bug #1469] Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129 — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/01/18

Issue #1469 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#28383] [Bug #1469](Rejected) Different behavior of class variables in 1.9.0 and 1.9.1p129 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/01

Issue #1469 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23455] TOK_INTERN not using argument? — daz <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>

Following this change ...

1 message 2009/05/15

[#23456] REXML Thread Safety — Weston Sewell <weston.sewell@...>

I've been using Ruby for several years but I just joined the list because I

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#23467] Re: REXML Thread Safety — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/15

FWIW, most DOM implementations are not thread-safe.

[#23457] [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1471: "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7

17 messages 2009/05/15
[#23957] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/06/21

Issue #1471 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.
[#23459] [Bug #1471](Closed) "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/15

Issue #1471 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23461] Re: [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/15

Sidenote--
[#23479] Re: [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/05/16

[#23480] Re: [Bug #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/16

Hi,
[#23489] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/05/18

Issue #1471 has been updated by John Carter.
[#23490] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/05/18

Issue #1471 has been updated by John Carter.
[#23500] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/05/19

Issue #1471 has been updated by John Carter.
[#23516] Re: [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/20

Hi,
[#24230] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/07/09

Issue #1471 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.
[#25311] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Daniel Azuma <redmine@...> 2009/09/03

Issue #1471 has been updated by Daniel Azuma.
[#31326] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Tadashi Saito <redmine@...> 2010/07/17

Issue #1471 has been updated by Tadashi Saito.
[#31327] [Backport #1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Tadashi Saito <redmine@...> 2010/07/17

Issue #1471 has been updated by Tadashi Saito.
[#35324] [Backport87-Backport#1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2011/02/21

Issue #1471 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#35334] [Backport87-Backport#1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2011/02/22

Issue #1471 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#35336] [Backport87-Backport#1471] "Mutual join" deadlock detection faulty in 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2011/02/22

Issue #1471 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23460] [Bug #1472] rb_f_syscall converts string value to null terminated c string, but syscall structs can contain nulls. — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1472: rb_f_syscall converts string value to null terminated c string, but syscall structs can contain nulls.

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#27548] [Bug #1472] rb_f_syscall converts string value to null terminated c string, but syscall structs can contain nulls. — John Carter <redmine@...> 2010/01/11

Issue #1472 has been updated by John Carter.

[#23464] [Feature #1473] Improvements on expect.rb — Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <redmine@...>

Feature #1473: Improvements on expect.rb

5 messages 2009/05/15
[#23504] Re: [Feature #1473] Improvements on expect.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/05/19

[#23518] Re: [Feature #1473] Improvements on expect.rb — Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...> 2009/05/21

If no one is interested, I can try to improve expect.rb. Is there anything I
[#29141] [Feature #1473] Improvements on expect.rb — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1473 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29387] [Feature #1473](Closed) Improvements on expect.rb — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1473 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23466] [Bug #1474] autoload causes "circular require considered harmful" warning without circular require — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #1474: autoload causes "circular require considered harmful" warning without circular require

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#23477] [Bug #1474](Closed) autoload causes "circular require considered harmful" warning without circular require — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1474 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23468] trunk thinks it is running ruby 1.8.6 (Was: Ruby:r23419 (trunk) [...]) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

On May 12, 2009, at 23:23, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

1 message 2009/05/15

[#23469] [Bug #1475] ruby -w warns about encoding for the wrong file — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #1475: ruby -w warns about encoding for the wrong file

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#23471] [Bug #1475](Closed) ruby -w warns about encoding for the wrong file — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1475 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23470] [Bug #1476] ruby -w warns about encoding used as RDoc — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #1476: ruby -w warns about encoding used as RDoc

2 messages 2009/05/15
[#23473] [Bug #1476](Closed) ruby -w warns about encoding used as RDoc — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1476 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23483] [Bug #1478] Ruby archive — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1478: Ruby archive

29 messages 2009/05/16
[#28983] [Feature #1478](Rejected) Ruby archive — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1478 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28990] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1478 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.
[#29217] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.
[#29225] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#30345] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/05/21

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 17:13, Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#30346] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

> Thanks for your comment.
[#30347] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/05/21

OK Hiroshi, I read some of the comments earlier in the thread that I
[#30352] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/05/21

[#30355] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/21

On 5/20/10, Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@jmnet.us> wrote:
[#30364] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

Hi,
[#30367] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/05/22

(2010/05/22 19:58), Benoit Daloze wrote:
[#30369] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/22

On 22 May 2010 18:40, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#30370] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/05/22

(2010/05/23 2:38), Benoit Daloze wrote:
[#30973] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/06/30

On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#30975] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/06/30

Headius, I'm not against for the idea of archiving itself, and I don't th=
[#31097] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/07/06

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#30368] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/05/22

[#30429] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/05/26

On May 22, 2010, at 09:41, Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#30969] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/06/30

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#30971] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/06/30

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#30568] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2010/06/03

Hi,
[#30970] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/06/30

JRuby already supports loading scripts out of .jar files, either by
[#31102] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2010/07/07

Issue #1478 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#31140] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2010/07/08

Hongli Lai <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#31141] [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/07/09

Issue #1478 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#31154] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/09

[#31160] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/07/09

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:07 AM, James Tucker <jftucker@gmail.com> wrote:
[#31210] Re: [Feature #1478] Ruby archive — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2010/07/12

[#23484] [Bug #1480] Ruby/Tk infinite loop — Oleg Puchinin <redmine@...>

Bug #1480: Ruby/Tk infinite loop

2 messages 2009/05/17
[#23485] Re: [Bug #1480] Ruby/Tk infinite loop — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2009/05/17

From: Oleg Puchinin <redmine@ruby-lang.org>

[#23491] [Bug #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Evgeniy Dolzhenko <redmine@...>

Bug #1482: Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows

6 messages 2009/05/18
[#26973] [Bug #1482](Feedback) Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/12/01

Issue #1482 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#29145] [Feature #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1482 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29147] [Feature #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/03/30

Issue #1482 has been updated by Jon Forums.
[#29150] Re: [Feature #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/03/30

Hi,
[#29495] [Feature #1482] Kernel.exec doesn't respect COMSPEC environment variable on Windows — Evgeniy Dolzhenko <redmine@...> 2010/04/13

Issue #1482 has been updated by Evgeniy Dolzhenko.

[#23492] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...>

Bug #1484: Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions

8 messages 2009/05/18
[#23498] Re: [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160have threading regressions — John Carter <john.carter@...> 2009/05/19

On Mon, 18 May 2009, Hans de Graaff wrote:
[#24212] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/08

Issue #1484 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24220] Re: [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/08

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Roger Pack<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#24231] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/07/09

Issue #1484 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.
[#25120] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Daniel Azuma <redmine@...> 2009/08/25

Issue #1484 has been updated by Daniel Azuma.
[#25250] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/09/01

Issue #1484 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#25450] [Bug #1484] Ruby 1.8.6_p368 and Ruby 1.8.7_p160 have threading regressions — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/09/07

Issue #1484 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.

[#23494] [Bug #1486] DL::CParser#parse_struct_signature fails when argument is a String. — Minwoo Lee <redmine@...>

Bug #1486: DL::CParser#parse_struct_signature fails when argument is a String.

3 messages 2009/05/18
[#24945] [Bug #1486] DL::CParser#parse_struct_signature fails when argument is a String. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/08/17

Issue #1486 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#24943] [Bug #1486] DL::CParser#parse_struct_signature fails when argument is a String. — Minwoo Lee <redmine@...> 2009/08/17

Issue #1486 has been updated by Minwoo Lee.

[#23496] --enable-pthread: when should Ruby use getcontext()/setcontext() instead of _longjmp()/_setjmp()? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>

When --enable-pthread is given, Ruby 1.8 will currently use getcontext()

2 messages 2009/05/18
[#23583] Re: --enable-pthread: when should Ruby use getcontext()/setcontext() instead of _longjmp()/_setjmp()? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/28

Hi,

[#23497] Interrupt < Signal, but initialize mismatched — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

this problem exists on 1.8 and 1.9 and was previously reported by Eric

1 message 2009/05/18

[#23499] [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1487: String#each_char must return self

9 messages 2009/05/19
[#23524] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/23

Hi,
[#23525] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...> 2009/05/23

On Sat, 23 May 2009 10:20:50 +0900
[#23526] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/23

Excerpts from Michael Fellinger's message of Sat May 23 17:38:35 +0300 2009:
[#23527] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/23

Hi,
[#23528] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/23

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Sat May 23 18:34:35 +0300 2009:
[#23530] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/23

Hi,
[#23533] Re: [Bug #1487] String#each_char must return self — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2009/05/23

As per Eero Saynatkari's suggestion, my response is:
[#23529] [Bug #1487](Closed) String#each_char must return self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/05/23

Issue #1487 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#23501] [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0 — Paul Harris <redmine@...>

Bug #1490: DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0

4 messages 2009/05/19
[#23502] Re: [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0 — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...> 2009/05/19

Hello Paul,
[#23507] [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0 — Paul Harris <redmine@...> 2009/05/20

Issue #1490 has been updated by Paul Harris.
[#23509] Re: [Bug #1490] DateTime::civil fails with second=59 and fractional second > 0 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/20

Hi,

[#23503] [Feature #1493] [patch] lex_state as bit field / IS_lex_state() macro — Dave B <redmine@...>

Feature #1493: [patch] lex_state as bit field / IS_lex_state() macro

1 message 2009/05/19

[#23505] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nicholas Manning <redmine@...>

Bug #1494: tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows

19 messages 2009/05/19
[#24437] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Eric Wong <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1494 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#24439] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Niels Ganser <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1494 has been updated by Niels Ganser.
[#25006] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2009/08/20

Issue #1494 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#25007] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/08/20

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Kemper<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote=
[#25008] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/08/20

Issue #1494 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#25011] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/08/20

Hi,
[#25012] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/08/20

Hi,
[#25017] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/08/21

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto<matz@ruby-lang.org> wro=
[#25013] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/08/21

Issue #1494 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#25018] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/08/21

Issue #1494 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#25019] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/08/21

In article <4a8e5e433964c_2103af42194571e@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,
[#25021] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2009/08/21

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#25022] Re: [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2009/08/21

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#25026] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/08/21

Issue #1494 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#25118] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/08/25

Issue #1494 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#25128] [Bug #1494](Third Party's Issue) tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/08/26

Issue #1494 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#25129] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/08/26

Issue #1494 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#25132] [Bug #1494] tempfile#unlink may silently fail on windows — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/08/26

Issue #1494 has been updated by Hongli Lai.

[#23506] [Bug #1495] warn_printf is an unhealthy thing to have in rb_thread_schedule as it can cause recursion. — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1495: warn_printf is an unhealthy thing to have in rb_thread_schedule as it can cause recursion.

3 messages 2009/05/20
[#23510] Re: [Bug #1495] warn_printf is an unhealthy thing to have in rb_thread_schedule as it can cause recursion. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/20

Hi,
[#23514] [Bug #1495] warn_printf is an unhealthy thing to have in rb_thread_schedule as it can cause recursion. — John Carter <redmine@...> 2009/05/20

Issue #1495 has been updated by John Carter.

[#23508] [Bug #1496] Net::IMAP#fetch incorrectly quotes message data item names — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Bug #1496: Net::IMAP#fetch incorrectly quotes message data item names

3 messages 2009/05/20
[#29327] [Bug #1496] Net::IMAP#fetch incorrectly quotes message data item names — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1496 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29820] [Bug #1496] Net::IMAP#fetch incorrectly quotes message data item names — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #1496 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#23512] [Bug #1497] test_exception fails in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1497: test_exception fails in windows

2 messages 2009/05/20
[#26843] [Bug #1497](Closed) test_exception fails in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1497 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23513] [Feature #1498] rubygems tests fail on zlib dependency if you compile ruby without zlib headers — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1498: rubygems tests fail on zlib dependency if you compile ruby without zlib headers

3 messages 2009/05/20
[#26682] [Feature #1498] rubygems tests fail on zlib dependency if you compile ruby without zlib headers — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/11/11

Issue #1498 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#26685] [Feature #1498](Rejected) rubygems tests fail on zlib dependency if you compile ruby without zlib headers — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/11

Issue #1498 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23515] [Bug #1499] Commit 22478 has "that can't be right!" defect in rb_thread_schedule. — John Carter <redmine@...>

Bug #1499: Commit 22478 has "that can't be right!" defect in rb_thread_schedule.

2 messages 2009/05/20
[#24781] [Bug #1499](Closed) Commit 22478 has "that can't be right!" defect in rb_thread_schedule. — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/08/05

Issue #1499 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#23517] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1500: test_io runs forever in windows

8 messages 2009/05/21
[#23692] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/03

Issue #1500 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24371] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1500 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#23669] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Jon Coppeard <redmine@...> 2009/06/02

Issue #1500 has been updated by Jon Coppeard.
[#24434] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/18

Issue #1500 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24558] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Hal Perkins <redmine@...> 2009/07/25

Issue #1500 has been updated by Hal Perkins.
[#26850] [Bug #1500] test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/21

Issue #1500 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#27400] [Bug #1500](Third Party's Issue) test_io runs forever in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/04

Issue #1500 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23519] [Bug #1502] installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — "Jan-Erik R." <redmine@...>

Bug #1502: installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix

2 messages 2009/05/21
[#23521] [Bug #1502](Closed) installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/05/22

Issue #1502 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23520] [Bug #1504] installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>

Bug #1504: installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix

3 messages 2009/05/22
[#23522] Re: [Bug #1504] installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2009/05/22

[#23523] Re: [Bug #1504] installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/05/22

On May 22, 2009, at 03:22, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:

[#23531] [Bug #1504](Closed) installed ri docu is not where ri actually searches when compiled with program-suffix — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>

Issue #1504 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

1 message 2009/05/23

[#23534] [Bug #1385] Wonderful undocumented feature in Ruby 1.8.7 & 1.9 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Issue #1385 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

1 message 2009/05/23

[#23537] [Bug #1507] some windows make test failures — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1507: some windows make test failures

1 message 2009/05/23

[#23538] [ANN] RubyKaigi2009: Commiter Invitation — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

1 message 2009/05/24

[#23540] [Bug #1510] [patch] String#partition can return wrong result or crash — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1510: [patch] String#partition can return wrong result or crash

3 messages 2009/05/24
[#23541] [Bug #1510](Closed) [patch] String#partition can return wrong result or crash — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/24

Issue #1510 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23542] [Bug #1510] [patch] String#partition can return wrong result or crash — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/05/24

Issue #1510 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23543] a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Following a discussion on ruby-talk of a few ideas for ruby[1],

10 messages 2009/05/25
[#23545] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2009/05/25

On 2009/05/25 13:41, Roger Pack wrote:
[#23548] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/25

Excerpts from rogerdpack's message of Mon May 25 07:41:36 +0300 2009:
[#23549] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/25

> I am pretty opposed to adding #in?; however, it is currently
[#23550] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2009/05/25

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 18:32, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23552] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/25

> 5.between? 0, 10
[#23553] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/25

Excerpts from rogerdpack's message of Mon May 25 20:22:56 +0300 2009:
[#23555] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/25

Roger Pack wrote:
[#23579] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/27

> The very strong argument against this is that membership in a collection is
[#24402] Re: a feature for ruby: Kernel#in? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/17

> thought I'd suggest them (one at a time) to core.

[#23544] [Bug #1511] "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API — Br Hug <redmine@...>

Bug #1511: "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API

4 messages 2009/05/25
[#23546] [Bug #1511] "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API — Br Hug <redmine@...> 2009/05/25

Issue #1511 has been updated by Br Hug.
[#23547] [Bug #1511] "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/25

Issue #1511 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23563] [Bug #1511] "[BUG] Segmentation fault" with Win32API — Br Hug <redmine@...> 2009/05/26

Issue #1511 has been updated by Br Hug.

[#23551] [Bug #1514] test_time.rb failure in windows (mingw) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1514: test_time.rb failure in windows (mingw)

3 messages 2009/05/25
[#23554] [Bug #1514](Closed) test_time.rb failure in windows (mingw) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/25

Issue #1514 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23562] [Bug #1514] test_time.rb failure in windows (mingw) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/26

Issue #1514 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23556] [Bug #1515] [PATCH] Teach Matrix#square? About Non-Square Matrices; Fix Crasher — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1515: [PATCH] Teach Matrix#square? About Non-Square Matrices; Fix Crasher

1 message 2009/05/25

[#23557] [Bug #1516] Matrix#determinant Documentation Error — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1516: Matrix#determinant Documentation Error

2 messages 2009/05/25
[#25749] [Bug #1516](Closed) Matrix#determinant Documentation Error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/24

Issue #1516 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23558] AST changes in ruby 1.8.6-p368 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I just did `multiruby_setup the_usual` and `rake multi` on ParseTree

4 messages 2009/05/25
[#23560] Re: AST changes in ruby 1.8.6-p368 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/26

Hi,
[#23570] Re: AST changes in ruby 1.8.6-p368 — Michael Furr <furr@...> 2009/05/26

[#23627] Re: AST changes in ruby 1.8.6-p368 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/05/29

[#23559] [Bug #1517] Matrix[] Performs No Argument Validation, Confusing Some of Its Instance Methods — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1517: Matrix[] Performs No Argument Validation, Confusing Some of Its Instance Methods

1 message 2009/05/26

[#23561] [Bug #1518] Matrix#[] Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Index — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1518: Matrix#[] Raises NoMethodError for Invalid Index

1 message 2009/05/26

[#23564] [Bug #1519] RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete — Anthony Richardson <redmine@...>

Bug #1519: RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete

4 messages 2009/05/26
[#23565] [Bug #1519] RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete — Rick DeNatale <redmine@...> 2009/05/26

Issue #1519 has been updated by Rick DeNatale.
[#23575] [Bug #1519] RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/05/27

Issue #1519 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#29328] [Bug #1519](Closed) RDoc for Time.strftime() incomplete — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/08

Issue #1519 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23567] [Backport #1524] r22332 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Backport #1524: r22332 should be backported to 1.8.6

3 messages 2009/05/26
[#23568] [Backport #1524] r22332 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/26

Issue #1524 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#25484] [Backport #1524](Closed) r22332 should be backported to 1.8.6 — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2009/09/08

Issue #1524 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#23571] questions on recv in windows 1.9 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Q291cGxlIG9mIHF1ZXN0aW9ucywgaWYgYW55b25lIG91dCB0aGVyZSBoYXMgZmVlZGJhY2s6Cgox

1 message 2009/05/27

[#23572] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #1525: Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork?

27 messages 2009/05/27
[#23573] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/05/27

Issue #1525 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#24490] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Vanja Bucic <redmine@...> 2009/07/22

Issue #1525 has been updated by Vanja Bucic.
[#24492] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Lee Hinman <matthew.hinman@...> 2009/07/22

On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:06 PM, Vanja Bucic wrote:
[#24516] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — "none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2009/07/23

Lee Hinman wrote:
[#25839] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Stanislav Sedov <stas@...> 2009/09/29

On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:12:33 +0900
[#24491] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Vanja Bucic <redmine@...> 2009/07/22

Issue #1525 has been updated by Vanja Bucic.
[#24543] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Vanja Bucic <redmine@...> 2009/07/23

Issue #1525 has been updated by Vanja Bucic.
[#24563] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — "none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2009/07/26

Vanja Bucic wrote:
[#24565] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2009/07/26

none < wrote:
[#24570] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/07/27

In article <4A6C5608.1080202@plan99.net>,
[#24572] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2009/07/27

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#24573] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/07/27

Hi,
[#24583] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — "none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2009/07/28

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#24578] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Eric Wong <redmine@...> 2009/07/27

Issue #1525 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#24584] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — "none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@...> 2009/07/28

Eric Wong wrote:
[#24585] Re: [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2009/07/28

"none <" <tetsu.soh.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
[#26783] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/11/17

Issue #1525 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#26784] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Vanja Bucic <redmine@...> 2009/11/17

Issue #1525 has been updated by Vanja Bucic.
[#26786] [Bug #1525] Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2009/11/17

Issue #1525 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#26804] [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/11/18

Issue #1525 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#26805] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/11/18

In article <4b03c299d3778_4360404660a1be@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,
[#26809] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2009/11/18

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#26815] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/11/18

In article <87einw55ej.fsf@fsij.org>,
[#26859] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2009/11/21

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#26904] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/11/25

In article <4B07C4C5.8060102@plan99.net>,
[#26906] Re: [Bug #1525](Closed) Deadlock in Ruby 1.9's VM caused by ConditionVariable.wait and fork? — Daniel Cavanagh <danielcavanagh@...> 2009/11/25

On 25/11/2009, at 5:57 PM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#23576] [Bug #1526] Inconsistency with Matrix#row_vectors([]) and Matrix#column_vectors([]) — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1526: Inconsistency with Matrix#row_vectors([]) and Matrix#column_vectors([])

2 messages 2009/05/27
[#26187] [Bug #1526](Rejected) Inconsistency with Matrix#row_vectors([]) and Matrix#column_vectors([]) — Keiju Ishitsuka <redmine@...> 2009/10/20

Issue #1526 has been updated by Keiju Ishitsuka.

[#23577] compile difficulty with 4.4 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Just tried compiling ruby TRUNK with mingw 4.4

2 messages 2009/05/27
[#23578] Re: compile difficulty with 4.4 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/27

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23581] [Bug #1527] 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1527: 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed

4 messages 2009/05/27
[#23582] [Bug #1527] 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/27

Issue #1527 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#23599] [Bug #1527] 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1527 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#24826] [Bug #1527] 1.9 compilation fails on windows if you have the pthread library installed — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/08/08

Issue #1527 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23584] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...>

Bug #1528: setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv

7 messages 2009/05/28
[#23585] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Manfred Stienstra <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1528 has been updated by Manfred Stienstra.
[#23586] [Bug #1528](Rejected) setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1528 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23587] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Hans de Graaff <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1528 has been updated by Hans de Graaff.
[#23589] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1528 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#25698] [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Vincent Danjean <redmine@...> 2009/09/21

Issue #1528 has been updated by Vincent Danjean.
[#25744] Re: [Bug #1528] setlocale is not initialized causing problems when using iconv — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/09/24

Hi,

[#23588] [Bug #1529] unable to compile OOTB — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1529: unable to compile OOTB

3 messages 2009/05/28
[#23592] Re: [Bug #1529] unable to compile OOTB — Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Roger Pack <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#23611] [Bug #1529](Closed) unable to compile OOTB — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/29

Issue #1529 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23590] [Bug #1530] configure option --program-suffix does not play well with runtime ri lookup — Robert Klemme <redmine@...>

Bug #1530: configure option --program-suffix does not play well with runtime ri lookup

2 messages 2009/05/28
[#23591] [Bug #1530] configure option --program-suffix does not play well with runtime ri lookup — Robert Klemme <redmine@...> 2009/05/28

Issue #1530 has been updated by Robert Klemme.

[#23593] Defining #name= at the class level — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>

Hi folks,

10 messages 2009/05/28
[#23603] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/28

Hi,
[#23604] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/28

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Fri May 29 01:21:19 +0300 2009:
[#23605] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/28

Hi,
[#23606] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#23618] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/29

Hi,
[#23624] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/05/29

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#23607] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/28

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Fri May 29 01:53:05 +0300 2009:
[#23615] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/05/29

Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#23616] Re: Defining #name= at the class level — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/29

Excerpts from Charles Oliver Nutter's message of Fri May 29 06:12:49 +0300 2009:

[#23594] [1].cycle.to_a causes very tight loop — Ian Duggan <ian@...>

I'm not sure if this goes into the category of "just don't do that"

1 message 2009/05/28

[#23595] Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>

The RUBY_PLATFORM constant is documented in the latest Pickaxe as "The

17 messages 2009/05/28
[#23600] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2009/05/28

[#23596] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wr=
[#23602] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23608] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/28

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wr=
[#23609] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23610] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wr=
[#23612] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/05/29

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23619] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/29

> 1) The guy who wrote the gem fell into the trap of assuming that
[#23620] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/29

> Somewhat unrelated is that currently you can't tell from within ruby
[#23621] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2009/05/29

Roger Pack wrote:
[#23622] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/29

>> =A0>> Rubinius::COMPILER
[#23623] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/29

Excerpts from rogerdpack's message of Fri May 29 16:14:22 +0300 2009:
[#23635] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/05/30

>> >> =A0>> Rubinius::COMPILER_VERSION
[#24456] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/20

> but not quite. =A0Maybe I should submit a patch to gems like
[#24457] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/07/20

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
[#24458] Re: Meaning of RUBY_PLATFORM — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/07/20

> On Cygwin, Gem.win_platform? returns true, but Cygwin emulates a POSIX

[#23597] [Bug #1531] Matrix#determinant fails on some matrices — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1531: Matrix#determinant fails on some matrices

2 messages 2009/05/28
[#25608] [Bug #1531](Closed) Matrix#determinant fails on some matrices — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/16

Issue #1531 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23598] [Bug #1532] Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #1532: Improved matrix.rb [patch]

5 messages 2009/05/28
[#25624] [Bug #1532] Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/17

Issue #1532 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26182] [Bug #1532](Closed) Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Keiju Ishitsuka <redmine@...> 2009/10/20

Issue #1532 has been updated by Keiju Ishitsuka.
[#26189] [Bug #1532](Open) Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/20

Issue #1532 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26267] [Bug #1532](Closed) Improved matrix.rb [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/24

Issue #1532 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23601] [Bug #1533] Inconsistency Between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1533: Inconsistency Between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect

2 messages 2009/05/28
[#23613] [Bug #1533](Closed) Inconsistency Between Hash#to_s and Hash#inspect — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/29

Issue #1533 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23614] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1535: Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError

7 messages 2009/05/29
[#23617] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/29

Issue #1535 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#23626] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/05/29

Issue #1535 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.
[#23629] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/30

Issue #1535 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#28189] [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/02/16

Issue #1535 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#28190] Re: [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/02/16

Hi,
[#28193] Re: [Bug #1535] Hash#merge! Inside Iterator Can Cause RuntimeError — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/02/16

Hi,

[#23628] [Bug #1539] [Docs] Hash#rehash Raises RuntimeError Not IndexError — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1539: [Docs] Hash#rehash Raises RuntimeError Not IndexError

2 messages 2009/05/29
[#25750] [Bug #1539](Closed) [Docs] Hash#rehash Raises RuntimeError Not IndexError — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/24

Issue #1539 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#23630] Expected Behaviour of Modifying an Iterator in the Block to Which it Yields? — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2009/05/30
[#23633] Re: Expected Behaviour of Modifying an Iterator in the Block to Which it Yields? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/30

Hi,
[#23637] Re: Expected Behaviour of Modifying an Iterator in the Block to Which it Yields? — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/05/30

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=

[#23636] feature request: Directory.dir? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

For some reason it seems odd to have to do File.dir?

6 messages 2009/05/30
[#23645] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/05/31

Hi,
[#23676] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/02

>> For some reason it seems odd to have to do File.dir?
[#23677] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/06/02

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23678] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/06/02

Roger Pack wrote:
[#23679] Re: feature request: Directory.dir? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/06/02

> Aw, heck, why not

[#23638] [Bug #1540] read on win32 now defaults to blocking — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1540: read on win32 now defaults to blocking

2 messages 2009/05/30
[#23863] [Bug #1540] read on win32 now defaults to blocking — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/06/15

Issue #1540 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23639] [Bug #1541] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1541: mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket.

5 messages 2009/05/30
[#30567] [Bug #1541][Feedback] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/06/03

Issue #1541 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#30577] [Bug #1541][Closed] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/06/03

Issue #1541 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#30581] Re: [Bug #1541][Closed] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/06/04

Hello,
[#30582] Re: [Bug #1541][Closed] mingw ssl: Errno::ENOTSOCK: An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/06/04

Hello,

[#23640] [Bug #1542] test_inplace_rename_impossible(TestArgf) — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1542: test_inplace_rename_impossible(TestArgf)

2 messages 2009/05/30
[#26845] [Bug #1542](Closed) test_inplace_rename_impossible(TestArgf) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1542 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23641] [Bug #1543] failure: test_endblockwarn(TestBeginEndBlock) [c:/dev/downloads/ruby_trunk/test/ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:66]: — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1543: failure: test_endblockwarn(TestBeginEndBlock) [c:/dev/downloads/ruby_trunk/test/ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:66]:

2 messages 2009/05/30
[#29929] [Bug #1543](Closed) failure: test_endblockwarn(TestBeginEndBlock) [c:/dev/downloads/ruby_trunk/test/ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:66]: — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/02

Issue #1543 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23642] [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Brian Lopez <redmine@...>

Bug #1544: rb_io_write bug?

6 messages 2009/05/30
[#23650] Re: [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/05/31

Hi,
[#24089] [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Brian Lopez <redmine@...> 2009/06/29

Issue #1544 has been updated by Brian Lopez.
[#27880] [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/01/27

Issue #1544 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#29382] [Bug #1544](Feedback) rb_io_write bug? — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1544 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29389] [Bug #1544] rb_io_write bug? — Brian Lopez <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1544 has been updated by Brian Lopez.

[#23644] [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1545: Patches for the Hash Documentation

5 messages 2009/05/31
[#23647] Re: [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/05/31

Excerpts from message of Sun May 31 06:38:54 +0300 2009:
[#23667] Re: [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/06/02

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Eero Saynatkari
[#23673] Re: [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/06/02

Excerpts from Run Paint Run Run's message of Tue Jun 02 04:22:37 +0300 2009:
[#24067] [Bug #1545] Patches for the Hash Documentation — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...> 2009/06/28

Issue #1545 has been updated by Run Paint Run Run.

[#23646] Counterpart to File.extname — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>

File.extname ought to have a complementary method that gets everything

6 messages 2009/05/31
[#23648] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — Ian Duggan <ian@...> 2009/05/31

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23652] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:35:47 +0900
[#23654] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@gmail.com> wrote:
[#23655] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — George <george.ogata@...> 2009/06/01

FWIW, there is a precedent: man 1 basename . It was no doubt modelled after
[#23656] Re: Counterpart to File.extname — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2009/06/01

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:52 PM, George <george.ogata@gmail.com> wrote:

[#23649] [Bug #1547] Fiber#alive? Returns 0 for true on 1.9.1 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1547: Fiber#alive? Returns 0 for true on 1.9.1

2 messages 2009/05/31
[#27052] [Backport #1547](Rejected) Fiber#alive? Returns 0 for true on 1.9.1 — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/12/05

Issue #1547 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#23651] [Bug #1548] Segfault when Transferring to a Fiber which Resumes Itself — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1548: Segfault when Transferring to a Fiber which Resumes Itself

2 messages 2009/05/31
[#23653] [Bug #1548](Closed) Segfault when Transferring to a Fiber which Resumes Itself — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/06/01

Issue #1548 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[ruby-core:23638] [Bug #1540] read on win32 now defaults to blocking

From: Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-05-30 14:03:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #23638 
Bug #1540: read on win32 now defaults to blocking
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1540

Author: Roger Pack
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
ruby -v: TRUNK

Currently the win32.{c,h} files override calls to "read" in the code with windows style read calls.
The goal being to give read the same semantics on both linux and windows, for c ruby code.

With 1.8.6 the calls to read on linux+windows defaulted to non blocking.
Now (perhaps inadvertently) with 1.9, on linux they default to non blocking, and on windows blocking.  This breaks libraries that do their own "readability" checks then calls to read (like rev, eventmachine).
The request is to go to non blocking for linux+windows for 1.9, unless this is an expected change.
Thanks!
-=r


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next