[#11890] Ruby and Solaris door library — "Hiro Asari" <asari.ruby@...>

Hi, there. This is my first patch against ruby. I think I followed

19 messages 2007/08/13
[#11892] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/08/14

Hiro Asari wrote:

[#11899] pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2007/08/14
[#11903] Re: pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2007/08/15

On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:50:01AM +0900, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#11948] Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>

I just noticed that my ruby1.9 build of August 17th includes a Fiber

22 messages 2007/08/22
[#11949] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/08/22

David Flanagan wrote:

[#11950] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/08/22

On 8/22/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:

[#11952] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/08/22

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:50:12 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:

[#11988] String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>

I saw that Matz just merged his M17N implementation in the trunk.

17 messages 2007/08/25
[#11991] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Michael Neumann" <mneumann@...> 2007/08/25

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:54:20 +0200, Yukihiro Matsumoto

[#11992] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/08/25

Hi,

[#12042] Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — David Flanagan <david@...>

This message contains queries that probably only Matz can answer:

16 messages 2007/08/31
[#12043] Re: Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/08/31

Hi,

Re: Smoke testing Ruby

From: Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Date: 2007-08-29 14:20:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #12023
Here's URLs for all these suites.

> Rubicon still exists on RubyForge, but the version we've modified in 
> JRuby source is more clean and up-to-date (and we've added a lot to it).

Rubicon in JRuby (all test/unit, and without Ruby 1.6/1.7 tests):
http://svn.codehaus.org/jruby/trunk/jruby/test/rubicon/

Old rubicon and triple-r in RubyTests project:
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubytests/
http://rubytests.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/old/

> Daniel Berger has a selection of tests somewhere, I forget where. We 
> have a copy in JRuby.

These tests are part of the Shards project:
http://rubyforge.org/projects/shards/
http://viewvc.rubyforge.mmmultiworks.com/cgi/viewvc.cgi/ruby_test/?root=shards

There's also a number of benchmarks there as well.

> BFTS is another selection of tests, but only hits a few core classes 
> (albeit pretty well).

http://rubyforge.org/projects/bfts/

> Wilson mentioned Rubinius's specs.

http://rubini.us/svn/rubinius/trunk/spec/

> And then JRuby takes all these plus a bunch of our own and runs them as 
> part of our build and on the continuous integration server. The tests 
> are run once with the compiler enabled and once without.

http://svn.codehaus.org/jruby/trunk/jruby/test/

> Of course there's the tests in Ruby's own source.

http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/branches/ruby_1_8/test/

- Charlie

In This Thread