[#11852] continuations in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
In a comment on my recent blog post
On 8/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#11860] Is this really what we want? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I'm investigating some recent breakage in FasterCSV and have tracking
Hi,
[#11871] ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
[#11876] priorities of newly-created threads — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
Hi,
[#11886] Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#11890] Ruby and Solaris door library — "Hiro Asari" <asari.ruby@...>
Hi, there. This is my first patch against ruby. I think I followed
Hiro Asari wrote:
On 8/13/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 8/15/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#11893] UDP sockets raise exception on MIPS platform — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
I am running ruby-1.8.6 under OpenWrt (*), which is a small MIPS platform
[#11894] IO#seek and whence problem — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
[#11899] pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:50:01AM +0900, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:45:20PM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
> Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
[#11900] missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby? — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> > It seems ./configure did not detect the fact that bison was missing from
[#11930] Bug in select? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Hi
[#11945] Smoke testing Ruby — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On 8/21/07, Gabor Szabo <szabgab@gmail.com> wrote:
Ruby used to have the Triple-R project based on Rubicon: see
Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11947] Splatting MatchData bug? — Jos Backus <jos@...>
$ /tmp/ruby-1.9/bin/ruby -v
[#11948] Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
I just noticed that my ruby1.9 build of August 17th includes a Fiber
David Flanagan wrote:
On 8/22/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:50:12 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/22/07, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:57:01 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
[#11960] coroutines with Fiber::Core — David Flanagan <david@...>
The following code works on Linux with today's snapshot of 1.9:
Hi,
[#11981] Inverse Square Root — "Dave Pederson" <dave.pederson@...>
Hello-
[#11988] String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>
I saw that Matz just merged his M17N implementation in the trunk.
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:54:20 +0200, Yukihiro Matsumoto
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#12025] how to build ruby on vms — "toni" <toni@...>
Hi,
[#12040] Pragmas in Ruby 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
[#12042] Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — David Flanagan <david@...>
This message contains queries that probably only Matz can answer:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On 8/31/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Re: Ruby and Solaris door library
On 8/16/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Hiro Asari wrote: > > > On 8/15/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Hiro Asari [mailto:asari.ruby@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 7:04 AM > > > > To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org > > > > Subject: Re: Ruby and Solaris door library > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is best done as a 3rd party library given that it's > > > > > specific to one platform. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Dan, > > > > > > > > Now that Solaris is open source, it is conceivable that door > > > > library will be ported to another platform, much like ZFS. > > > > > > When it actually *is* ported, and people *actually* use it, then we > > > should consider merging it into core. Until then, I vote no. > > > > I wonder if anyone other than Dan and Urabe-san has opinions. > > I see the wisdom of the YAGNI approach, but solaris is out there, > and having this in the code base will remind others of related edge > cases, so having it in would act as a force pushing developers in a > direction where it will be easier to add for other systems later. > > I'm thinking about the case of the Unix developer who created a > directory containing single character filenames for all the legal > characters in a Unix filename, and that the directory stayed there > for a long time, tripping inadequately tested programs, helping to > make them more robust. I forget who this was now, and which book I > read it in, but I think it was one of Programming Pearls, The Art of > Unix Programming, or The Practice of Programming, > > The analogy is less than exact, so my conclusion (that adding it > would be good) may be false. > > -- > > Hirotsugu Asari > > Thank you, > Hugh > > Well, I actually want/need it now. As I stated before, I have the C code to make use of the door library, but for stat-like functions, I have to copy the code from file.c, which not very DRY. Have we convinced Dan yet? :-) Oh, by the way, Google gave me this link: http://smarden.org/socklog/readme.solaris.html which states that /var/run/syslog_door was introduced with Solaris 8. Before that, syslog used /etc/.syslog_door. -- Hirotsugu Asari