[#11852] continuations in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
In a comment on my recent blog post
On 8/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#11860] Is this really what we want? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I'm investigating some recent breakage in FasterCSV and have tracking
Hi,
[#11871] ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
[#11876] priorities of newly-created threads — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
Hi,
[#11886] Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#11890] Ruby and Solaris door library — "Hiro Asari" <asari.ruby@...>
Hi, there. This is my first patch against ruby. I think I followed
Hiro Asari wrote:
On 8/13/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 8/15/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#11893] UDP sockets raise exception on MIPS platform — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
I am running ruby-1.8.6 under OpenWrt (*), which is a small MIPS platform
[#11894] IO#seek and whence problem — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
[#11899] pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:50:01AM +0900, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:45:20PM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
> Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
[#11900] missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby? — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> > It seems ./configure did not detect the fact that bison was missing from
[#11930] Bug in select? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Hi
[#11945] Smoke testing Ruby — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On 8/21/07, Gabor Szabo <szabgab@gmail.com> wrote:
Ruby used to have the Triple-R project based on Rubicon: see
Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11947] Splatting MatchData bug? — Jos Backus <jos@...>
$ /tmp/ruby-1.9/bin/ruby -v
[#11948] Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
I just noticed that my ruby1.9 build of August 17th includes a Fiber
David Flanagan wrote:
On 8/22/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:50:12 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/22/07, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:57:01 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
[#11960] coroutines with Fiber::Core — David Flanagan <david@...>
The following code works on Linux with today's snapshot of 1.9:
Hi,
[#11981] Inverse Square Root — "Dave Pederson" <dave.pederson@...>
Hello-
[#11988] String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>
I saw that Matz just merged his M17N implementation in the trunk.
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:54:20 +0200, Yukihiro Matsumoto
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#12025] how to build ruby on vms — "toni" <toni@...>
Hi,
[#12040] Pragmas in Ruby 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
[#12042] Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — David Flanagan <david@...>
This message contains queries that probably only Matz can answer:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On 8/31/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Re: Is this really what we want?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Edward Gray II [mailto:james@grayproductions.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:53 AM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: Is this really what we want?
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In message "Re: Is this really what we want?"
> >> on Wed, 8 Aug 2007 05:08:43 +0900, James Edward Gray II
> >> <james@grayproductions.net> writes:
> >>
> >> |I'm investigating some recent breakage in FasterCSV and have
> >> tracking
> >> |it down to a change in the Date standard library. Is this really
> >> the
> >> |desired behavior now:
> >> |
> >> | $ ruby -r date -e 'p Date.parse("junk")'
> >> | #<Date: 4908505/2,0,2299161>
> >> |
> >> |?
> >>
> >> I asked the author, and he told us it's a side effect of parse
> >> accepting month name only. The parse methods (both Date.parse and
> >> Time.parse) are not for validation. Considering the complexity of
> >> date representation they accept, validation is nearly
> impossible.
> >> The
> >> author does not think it is worth the cost of implementing
> more rigid
> >> check.
> >>
> >> matz.
> >>
> >
> > Can we take that last sentence as an invitation for someone else to
> > bear the implementation cost? Does the author mean that
> contributions
> > would be welcome, or would he wish that people leave it alone? [I'm
> > not volunteering just yet :-), just wondering 'where we are'.]
>
> Boy, I sure hope so. I mean, it did use to validate dates, so I'll
> be recreating it in FCSV just to restore functionality unless
> someone
> steps up to the plate.
Perhaps we need a port of this, or something like it.
http://search.cpan.org/~gbarr/TimeDate-1.16/
I haven't looked at date2 or date4 (what happened to date3?) to see if
they offer different implementations of Date.parse.
Regards,
Dan
This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies of the communication and any attachments.