[#11890] Ruby and Solaris door library — "Hiro Asari" <asari.ruby@...>

Hi, there. This is my first patch against ruby. I think I followed

19 messages 2007/08/13
[#11892] Re: Ruby and Solaris door library — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/08/14

Hiro Asari wrote:

[#11899] pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2007/08/14
[#11903] Re: pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2007/08/15

On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:50:01AM +0900, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#11948] Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>

I just noticed that my ruby1.9 build of August 17th includes a Fiber

22 messages 2007/08/22
[#11949] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/08/22

David Flanagan wrote:

[#11950] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/08/22

On 8/22/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:

[#11952] Re: Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/08/22

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:50:12 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:

[#11988] String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>

I saw that Matz just merged his M17N implementation in the trunk.

17 messages 2007/08/25
[#11991] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Michael Neumann" <mneumann@...> 2007/08/25

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:54:20 +0200, Yukihiro Matsumoto

[#11992] Re: String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/08/25

Hi,

[#12042] Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — David Flanagan <david@...>

This message contains queries that probably only Matz can answer:

16 messages 2007/08/31
[#12043] Re: Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/08/31

Hi,

Latest benchmark results

From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date: 2007-08-17 04:07:47 UTC
List: ruby-core #11918
As I mentioned, I'm starting to do some profiling on Ruby. I just
downloaded the latest Ruby 1.9 from Subversion and ran it against the
"stock" Ruby on my Gentoo system (ruby 1.8.6 (2007-06-07 patchlevel 36,
compiled "-march=athlon-tbird -O2" with gcc 4.1.2). It's "matz" in the
table below, "ruby" is 1.9 (also compiled "-march=athlon-tbird -O2")

I'm going to run the matrix benchmark later. Meanwhile, this is quite
impressive.

-- benchmark summary ---------------------------
		matz	ruby
app_answer      3.668   0.281
app_factorial   2.334   1.459
app_fib 	20.503  3.060
app_mandelbrot  6.665   2.864
app_pentomino   347.538 77.393
app_raise       3.862   4.445
app_strconcat   3.632   1.723
app_tak 	25.912  3.912
app_tarai       20.612  3.051
loop_times      20.642  4.686
loop_whileloop  23.065  2.517
loop_whileloop2 4.661   0.502
so_ackermann    60.194  3.073
so_array        22.314  5.471
so_concatenate  8.418   1.542
so_count_words  1.226   0.011
so_exception    7.980   6.264
so_lists        3.090   1.239
so_matrix       5.906   1.602
so_nested_loop  19.893  4.192
so_object       16.888  10.182
so_random       5.793   1.536
so_sieve        1.518   0.276
vm1_block       77.119  10.268
vm1_const       39.372  4.065
vm1_ensure      56.354  3.205
vm1_length      44.467  4.997
vm1_rescue      41.753  3.061
vm1_simplereturn        66.893  6.681
vm1_swap        53.683  4.915
vm2_array       13.603  5.022
vm2_method      44.066  7.320
vm2_poly_method 51.816  8.394
vm2_poly_method_ov      10.023  1.403
vm2_proc        26.195  3.677
vm2_regexp      13.526  6.518
vm2_send        11.610  1.567
vm2_super       14.401  2.454
vm2_unif1       10.714  1.536
vm2_zsuper      15.487  2.500
vm3_thread_create_join  0.044   0.252

In This Thread

Prev Next