[#11852] continuations in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
In a comment on my recent blog post
On 8/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#11860] Is this really what we want? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I'm investigating some recent breakage in FasterCSV and have tracking
Hi,
[#11871] ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
[#11876] priorities of newly-created threads — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
Hi,
[#11886] Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#11890] Ruby and Solaris door library — "Hiro Asari" <asari.ruby@...>
Hi, there. This is my first patch against ruby. I think I followed
Hiro Asari wrote:
On 8/13/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 8/15/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#11893] UDP sockets raise exception on MIPS platform — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
I am running ruby-1.8.6 under OpenWrt (*), which is a small MIPS platform
[#11894] IO#seek and whence problem — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
[#11899] pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:50:01AM +0900, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:45:20PM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
> Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
[#11900] missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby? — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> > It seems ./configure did not detect the fact that bison was missing from
[#11930] Bug in select? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Hi
[#11945] Smoke testing Ruby — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On 8/21/07, Gabor Szabo <szabgab@gmail.com> wrote:
Ruby used to have the Triple-R project based on Rubicon: see
Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11947] Splatting MatchData bug? — Jos Backus <jos@...>
$ /tmp/ruby-1.9/bin/ruby -v
[#11948] Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
I just noticed that my ruby1.9 build of August 17th includes a Fiber
David Flanagan wrote:
On 8/22/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:50:12 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/22/07, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:57:01 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
[#11960] coroutines with Fiber::Core — David Flanagan <david@...>
The following code works on Linux with today's snapshot of 1.9:
Hi,
[#11981] Inverse Square Root — "Dave Pederson" <dave.pederson@...>
Hello-
[#11988] String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>
I saw that Matz just merged his M17N implementation in the trunk.
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:54:20 +0200, Yukihiro Matsumoto
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#12025] how to build ruby on vms — "toni" <toni@...>
Hi,
[#12040] Pragmas in Ruby 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
[#12042] Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — David Flanagan <david@...>
This message contains queries that probably only Matz can answer:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On 8/31/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Re: missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby?
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems ./configure did not detect the fact that bison was missing from
> my machine:
IIRC it would try to use yacc otherwise, but your output makes me think
you are on Linux, and I'm not sure about whether it could use yacc anyway
if there is no bison...
>
>
> svn co http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/trunk ruby
> cd ruby
> autoconf
> ./configure
> ...
What showed up in the log file? That might shed light on what is
going on.
> make
> /bin/sh: gperf: not found
> ...
> gcc -g -O2 -I. -I.ext/include/i686-linux -I./include -I.
> -DRUBY_EXPORT -c numeric.c
> gcc -g -O2 -I. -I.ext/include/i686-linux -I./include -I.
> -DRUBY_EXPORT -c object.c
> gcc -g -O2 -I. -I.ext/include/i686-linux -I./include -I.
> -DRUBY_EXPORT -c pack.c
> bison -o parse.c parse.y
> make: bison: Command not found
> make: *** [parse.c] Error 127
>
> =========================
> sudo aptitude install bison
> sudo aptitude install gperf
> =========================
This next step is wrong, IMHO -- you should make distclean and reconfigure
to get these picked up correctly before doing make again. In fact, since
you are using autoconf you may need to do that step again
> make
>
> ...
> gcc -g -O2 -I. -I.ext/include/i686-linux -I./include -I.
> -DRUBY_EXPORT -c version.c
> gcc -g -O2 -I. -I.ext/include/i686-linux -I./include -I.
> -DRUBY_EXPORT -c blockinlining.c
> rm -f ruby
> ruby ./tool/insns2vm.rb --srcdir="."
> /bin/sh: ruby: not found
> make: *** [optinsn.inc] Error 127
>
>
> What? Do I need an installed ruby to build ruby from trunk or am I
> missing something else here?
I'm not familiar enough with the details of the build process to
explain this, but I know from experience you don't need ruby to build ruby.
I seem to recall ruby making use of itself once built to do the final bits
of the build, and the install, but I don't really keep this stuff in my
head. Hoping someone else who writes this stuff can jump in here!
> If I need ruby, shouldn't configure complain that I don't have it?
>
> SVN currrently at r12933
> Using Ubuntu 7.04
>
> regards
> Gabor
>
HTH
Hugh