[#11852] continuations in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
In a comment on my recent blog post
On 8/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#11860] Is this really what we want? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I'm investigating some recent breakage in FasterCSV and have tracking
Hi,
[#11871] ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
[#11876] priorities of newly-created threads — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
Hi,
[#11886] Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#11890] Ruby and Solaris door library — "Hiro Asari" <asari.ruby@...>
Hi, there. This is my first patch against ruby. I think I followed
Hiro Asari wrote:
On 8/13/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 8/15/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#11893] UDP sockets raise exception on MIPS platform — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
I am running ruby-1.8.6 under OpenWrt (*), which is a small MIPS platform
[#11894] IO#seek and whence problem — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
[#11899] pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:50:01AM +0900, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:45:20PM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
> Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
[#11900] missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby? — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> > It seems ./configure did not detect the fact that bison was missing from
[#11930] Bug in select? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Hi
[#11945] Smoke testing Ruby — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On 8/21/07, Gabor Szabo <szabgab@gmail.com> wrote:
Ruby used to have the Triple-R project based on Rubicon: see
Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11947] Splatting MatchData bug? — Jos Backus <jos@...>
$ /tmp/ruby-1.9/bin/ruby -v
[#11948] Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
I just noticed that my ruby1.9 build of August 17th includes a Fiber
David Flanagan wrote:
On 8/22/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:50:12 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/22/07, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:57:01 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
[#11960] coroutines with Fiber::Core — David Flanagan <david@...>
The following code works on Linux with today's snapshot of 1.9:
Hi,
[#11981] Inverse Square Root — "Dave Pederson" <dave.pederson@...>
Hello-
[#11988] String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>
I saw that Matz just merged his M17N implementation in the trunk.
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:54:20 +0200, Yukihiro Matsumoto
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#12025] how to build ruby on vms — "toni" <toni@...>
Hi,
[#12040] Pragmas in Ruby 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
[#12042] Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — David Flanagan <david@...>
This message contains queries that probably only Matz can answer:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On 8/31/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Re: Smoke testing Ruby
Hugh Sasse wrote: > Ruby used to have the Triple-R project based on Rubicon: see > > http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/24820 > > but this seems to no longer exist. The nearest thing we have to > platform coverage now is Tattle > > http://tattle.rubygarden.org./ > > but this isn't a complete list of which tests of some suite succeeded, > just which platforms support Ruby and have tattle installed. > > Basically, there are a number of projects for testing ruby, and maybe > when there is a winner the idea will resurface. I hope so. Rubicon still exists on RubyForge, but the version we've modified in JRuby source is more clean and up-to-date (and we've added a lot to it). Daniel Berger has a selection of tests somewhere, I forget where. We have a copy in JRuby. BFTS is another selection of tests, but only hits a few core classes (albeit pretty well). Wilson mentioned Rubinius's specs. And then JRuby takes all these plus a bunch of our own and runs them as part of our build and on the continuous integration server. The tests are run once with the compiler enabled and once without. Of course there's the tests in Ruby's own source. The CI server is here: http://jruby.thresher.com/start.action It got a little flaky over the summer but it's settled back down in the past couple weeks. It's been a big help for us tracking stability as we improve compatibility and performance. JRuby's entire test suite is available here: http://svn.codehaus.org/jruby/trunk/jruby/test/ It's not super organized at the moment. Those under the root of the dir are a mix of minirunit and test/unit tests and were almost all created by JRuby developers over the years. Some of the tests are JRuby-specific, testing Java functionality and the like. There are some tests in Java code for the Java-facing JRuby APIs. Then there are tests under test/rubicon (our cleaned-up, converted, expanded rubicon tests), MRI (test/mri/sample/test.rb and test/externals/mri/*), BFTS (test/externals/bfts/*), Daniel Berger's stuff (test/externals/ruby_test), Rubinius specs (test/externals/rubinius/spec), and our set of benchmarks, including a copy of YARVs (test/bench/*). See also this article comparing test suites for Ruby used in JRuby: http://chneukirchen.org/blog/archive/2007/05/analyzing-the-jruby-test-suite.html I'd love to see this all some day move to a single standard location. - Charlie