[#11852] continuations in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
In a comment on my recent blog post
On 8/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#11860] Is this really what we want? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I'm investigating some recent breakage in FasterCSV and have tracking
Hi,
[#11871] ruby-openssl: == incorrect for X509-Subjects — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
[#11876] priorities of newly-created threads — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
Hi,
[#11886] Core dump with simple web scraper when run via cron — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#11890] Ruby and Solaris door library — "Hiro Asari" <asari.ruby@...>
Hi, there. This is my first patch against ruby. I think I followed
Hiro Asari wrote:
On 8/13/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
On 8/15/07, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#11893] UDP sockets raise exception on MIPS platform — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
I am running ruby-1.8.6 under OpenWrt (*), which is a small MIPS platform
[#11894] IO#seek and whence problem — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
[#11899] pack/unpack 64bit Integers — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:50:01AM +0900, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 02:45:20PM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
> Dumb question of the day: are Kernel#proc and Kernel#lambda identical?
[#11900] missing bison, gperf not detected, do I need ruby to build ruby? — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> > It seems ./configure did not detect the fact that bison was missing from
[#11930] Bug in select? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Hi
[#11945] Smoke testing Ruby — "Gabor Szabo" <szabgab@...>
Hi,
On 8/21/07, Gabor Szabo <szabgab@gmail.com> wrote:
Ruby used to have the Triple-R project based on Rubicon: see
Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11947] Splatting MatchData bug? — Jos Backus <jos@...>
$ /tmp/ruby-1.9/bin/ruby -v
[#11948] Fibers in Ruby 1.9? — David Flanagan <david@...>
I just noticed that my ruby1.9 build of August 17th includes a Fiber
David Flanagan wrote:
On 8/22/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:50:12 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/22/07, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:57:01 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
[#11960] coroutines with Fiber::Core — David Flanagan <david@...>
The following code works on Linux with today's snapshot of 1.9:
Hi,
[#11981] Inverse Square Root — "Dave Pederson" <dave.pederson@...>
Hello-
[#11988] String#length not working properly in Ruby 1.9 — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>
I saw that Matz just merged his M17N implementation in the trunk.
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:54:20 +0200, Yukihiro Matsumoto
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 8/25/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#12025] how to build ruby on vms — "toni" <toni@...>
Hi,
[#12040] Pragmas in Ruby 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
[#12042] Encodings of string literals; explicit codepoint escapes? — David Flanagan <david@...>
This message contains queries that probably only Matz can answer:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On 8/31/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Re: Import gem to Ruby 1.9
On Aug 3, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Jonas Pfenniger wrote:
> 2007/7/26, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi <nakahiro@sarion.co.jp>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> This mail is for the topic
> '6. What libraries does RubyGems depend on?'
>
> NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
> > 6. What libraries does RubyGems depend on?
> > YAML/Syck, WEBrick, the digest libraries, rbconfig, rdoc,
> thread,
> > optparse, forwardable, time, openssl, open-uri, uri, net/http,
> > fileutils, zlib, stringio, socket, tempfile, pathname
> + test/unit
>
> Here is a small script to check the number of loaded classes before
> and after rubygems. The second number only includes top level classes.
>
> Last time I checked, rubygems used more than one top level class to
> host it's code.
>
> -----
> def count_classes
> x=0; t=0
> ObjectSpace.each_object(Class) do |c|
> x+=1
> t+=1 if c.name !~ /::/
> end
> [x, t]
> end
>
> puts "Without rubygems : #{count_classes.inspect}"
> require 'rubygems'
> puts "With rubygems : #{count_classes.inspect}"
>
> -----
>
> Without rubygems : [183, 59]
> With rubygems : [469, 76]
To this effect, what about structuring rubygems so that not all of
it's classes are loaded all the time.
There are 2 use scenarios for "require 'rubygems'". One is typically
one, to be able to use the code contained in gems, the other is for
the 'gem' command to be able to do all it's manipulation and fetching
of gems.
Currently, "require 'rubygems'" is built for the 2nd scenario, but
thats probably incorrect, since that scenario is used vastly less
than scenario one.
If "require 'rubygems'" only included enough code be able to properly
alter the load path to allow a gem's code to be used, it would make
almost no impact on performance, where as now, it includes a huge
amount of unused code into every runtime.
Scenario 2 could easily covered by adding "require 'rubygems/dev'"
which would include the current bevy of classes and code.
After all, what generic rails app uses the TarReader class that
rubygems imports? For that that matter, what part of the rubygems
runtime (scenario 1) uses TarReader?
- Evan Phoenix
>
> --
> Cheers,
> zimbatm