From: Greg.mpls@... Date: 2017-10-29T12:32:28+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:83601] [Ruby trunk Bug#14065] Two categories of default gems? Issue #14065 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L). Martin, You're probably already aware, for those not, first set are 'pure ruby' gems, the second set are 'extension' gems, which require compiling. Greg ---------------------------------------- Bug #14065: Two categories of default gems? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14065#change-67626 * Author: duerst (Martin D��rst) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-10-29 trunk 60536) [x86_64-cygwin] * Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- When I make and install Ruby, the output at the end looks as follows: ``` installing default gems: /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0 (build_info, cache, doc, extensions, gems, specifications) bundler 1.15.4 ... webrick 1.4.0.beta1 installing default gems: /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0 (build_info, cache, doc, extensions, gems, specifications) bigdecimal 1.3.2 ... zlib 0.1.0 installing bundled gems: /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.5.0 (build_info, cache, doc, extensions, gems, specifications) did_you_mean-1.1.2.gem ... xmlrpc-0.3.0.gem ``` It's unclear what the distinction between the first and the second batch of "default gems" is. I suggest either merging the categories or making clear why there are two categories. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: