[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83535] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2017-10-24 07:02:16 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83535
Issue #13996 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).
```
/*
* aa is on-stack for small argc, we must ensure paths are marked
* for large argv if aa is on the heap.
*/
```
As `ALLOCV` uses `imemo_alloc` (`NODE_ALLOCA` till 2.4), the contents are marked.
```
size_t size = sizeof(const char *) + sizeof(VALUE);
const long len = (long)(sizeof(struct apply_arg) + (size * argc) - size);
```
I'm afraid that `struct apply_arg` and `fn` in it may not be guaranteed as never-padded.
Isn't it better to make it a separate struct, and calculate `len` using `offsetof`?
----------------------------------------
Feature #13996: [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13996#change-67563
* Author: normalperson (Eric Wong)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
This means File.chmod, File.lchmod, File.chown, File.lchown,
File.unlink, and File.utime operations on slow filesystems
no longer hold up other threads.
The platform-specific utime_failed changes is compile-tested
using a new UTIME_EINVAL macro
* file.c (UTIME_EINVAL): new macro to ease compile-testing
* file.c (struct apply_arg): new struct
* file.c (no_gvl_apply2files): new function
* file.c (apply2files): release GVL
* file.c (chmod_internal): adjust for apply2files changes
* file.c (lchmod_internal): ditto
* file.c (chown_internal): ditto
* file.c (lchown_internal): ditto
* file.c (utime_failed): ditto
* file.c (utime_internal): ditto
* file.c (unlink_internal): ditto
---Files--------------------------------
0001-file.c-apply2files-releases-GVL.patch (7.65 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>