[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83537] [Ruby trunk Bug#14046] Ripper loses DATA
From:
martyn.jago@...
Date:
2017-10-24 08:15:59 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83537
Issue #14046 has been reported by mjago (Martyn Jago). ---------------------------------------- Bug #14046: Ripper loses DATA https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14046 * Author: mjago (Martyn Jago) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-10-19 trunk 60213) [x86_64-darwin13] * Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Since the following is a valid self-contained script: ~~~ ruby p DATA.read # comment __END__ abc ~~~ should the `__END__` suffix data be preserved with `:on___end__` ? Alternatively should there be an `:on_ignored___end` token to preserve DATA? Notably the comment content is preserved: ~~~ [[[1, 0], :on_ident, "p", EXPR_CMDARG], [[1, 1], :on_sp, " ", EXPR_CMDARG], [[1, 2], :on_const, "DATA", EXPR_ARG], [[1, 6], :on_period, ".", EXPR_DOT], [[1, 7], :on_ident, "read", EXPR_ARG], [[1, 11], :on_sp, " ", EXPR_ARG], [[1, 12], :on_comment, "# comment\n", EXPR_ARG], [[2, 0], :on___end__, "__END__\n", EXPR_BEG]] ~~~ -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>