[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83106] [Ruby trunk Bug#13971] Ripper changes sexp - class methods
From:
Greg.mpls@...
Date:
2017-10-04 15:19:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83106
Issue #13971 has been reported by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
----------------------------------------
Bug #13971: Ripper changes sexp - class methods
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13971
* Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-10-04 trunk 60116) [x64-mingw32]
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
nobu, thank you for the fixes. I apologize; I missed some in the 1st report.
Code:
```ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true
require 'ripper'
require 'pp'
puts "\n#{RUBY_DESCRIPTION}"
puts "\nmodule T ; def self.test(w) w ; end ; end"
pp Ripper.sexp('module T ; def self.test(w) w ; end ; end')
puts "\nmodule T ; def self.<<(w) w ; end ; end"
pp Ripper.sexp('module T ; def self.<<(w) w ; end ; end')
puts "\nmodule T ; class << self ; def test(w) w ; end ; end ; end"
pp Ripper.sexp('module T ; class << self ; def test(w) w ; end ; end ; end')
puts "\nmodule T ; class << self ; def <<(w) w ; end ; end ; end"
pp Ripper.sexp('module T ; class << self ; def <<(w) w ; end ; end ; end')
```
Distinction as to 'self':
```
svn 60116
[:var_ref, :self]
svn 60101
[:var_ref, [:@kw, "self", [1, 15]]]
```
I'm finding these by running YARD, which uses Ripper for both its parsing and code highlighting. I know RDoc is/has changed over to using Ripper for parsing.
Hence, I'm not sure if these are expected 'breaking' changes or things that are not picked up in current Ripper tests...
Full output in attached files for 60101 and 60116.
---Files--------------------------------
60116.txt (1.92 KB)
60101.txt (1.99 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>