[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83392] [Ruby trunk Bug#13794] Infinite loop of sched_yield
From:
charlie@...
Date:
2017-10-19 10:51:36 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83392
Issue #13794 has been updated by catphish (Charlie Smurthwaite).
I'd just like to confirm that after several weeks, I have not seen a recurrence of this issue while running the original PID check patch. Thanks all!
----------------------------------------
Bug #13794: Infinite loop of sched_yield
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13794#change-67353
* Author: catphish (Charlie Smurthwaite)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.3.4p301 (2017-03-30 revision 58214) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: REQUIRED, 2.4: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
I have been encountering an issue with processes hanging in an infinite loop of calling sched_yield(). The looping code can be found at https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/v2_3_4/thread_pthread.c#L1663
while (ATOMIC_CAS(timer_thread_pipe.writing, (rb_atomic_t)0, 0)) {
native_thread_yield();
}
It is my belief that by some mechanism I have not been able to identify, timer_thread_pipe.writing is incremented but it never decremented, causing this loop to run infinitely.
I am not able to create a reproducible test case, however this issue occurs regularly in my production application. I have attached backtraces and thread lists from 2 processes exhibiting this behaviour. gdb confirms that timer_thread_pipe.writing = 1 in these processes.
I believe one possibility of the cause is that rb_thread_wakeup_timer_thread() or rb_thread_wakeup_timer_thread_low() is called, and before it returns, another thread calls fork(), leaving the value of timer_thread_pipe.writing incremented, but leaving behind the thread that would normally decrement it.
If this is correct, one solution would be to reset timer_thread_pipe.writing to 0 in native_reset_timer_thread() immediately after a fork.
Other examples of similar bugs being reported:
https://github.com/resque/resque/issues/578
https://github.com/zk-ruby/zk/issues/50
---Files--------------------------------
backtrace_1.txt (14 KB)
backtrace_2.txt (10.9 KB)
sched_yield_1.patch (738 Bytes)
sched_yield_loop.rb (212 Bytes)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>