[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83533] [Ruby trunk Feature#14043] Introduce Process.last_status as an alias for $?
From:
duerst@...
Date:
2017-10-24 01:50:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83533
Issue #14043 has been updated by duerst (Martin D端rst). normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote: > It's actually easier for me coming from Bourne shell and Perl to use > short names. For some people, yes. But my guess is that these days, most people coming to Ruby have no Perl and little if any shell experience. > We already have English.rb for the $CHILD_STATUS alias, and I'd > rather not force redundant bloat onto all users. It's true that $? may be easier to write for some people, but `last_status` should be easy for everybody to read, even for people who see it for the first time. The general direction in Ruby is to get rid, or at least provide replacements, for cryptic notations. I don't have a reference ready, but I seem to remember that getting rid of some Perl leftovers was one of the things being discussed for Ruby 3.0. Of course input on that direction is welcome. ---------------------------------------- Feature #14043: Introduce Process.last_status as an alias for $? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14043#change-67560 * Author: mrkn (Kenta Murata) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) * Target version: 2.5 ---------------------------------------- I found that we don't have any methods for an alias to `$?`, like `MatchData.last_match` for `$~`. I propose to introduce `Process.last_status` method for that purpose. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>