[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83578] [Ruby trunk Feature#14042] IO#puts: use writev if available
From:
eregontp@...
Date:
2017-10-26 12:41:43 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83578
Issue #14042 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
Correction, it only breaks one spec, not mspec.
The spec is "IO.popen raises IOError when writing a read-only pipe" in popen_spec.rb.
I reduced the code and this behaves differently:
~~~
$ chruby trunk
$ ruby -e 'IO.popen(["ruby", "-e", "sleep 1; puts :a"], "r").close'
Traceback (most recent call last):
3: from -e:1:in `<main>'
2: from -e:1:in `puts'
1: from -e:1:in `puts'
-e:1:in `write': Broken pipe @ io_writev - <STDOUT> (Errno::EPIPE)
$ chruby 2.4.2
$ ruby -e 'IO.popen(["ruby", "-e", "sleep 1; puts :a"], "r").close'
~~~
I don't understand why though.
----------------------------------------
Feature #14042: IO#puts: use writev if available
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14042#change-67606
* Author: rohitpaulk (Paul Kuruvilla)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
Hi,
I've attached a patch to make IO#puts use writev if available. Currently, IO#puts calls `write` twice: Once to write the string, and the second to write a newline (if the string doesn't end with one already). With this patch, those two calls are replaced with a single `writev` call.
A test has been added that demonstrates the problem.
For a bit of background:
* A related issue: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9420. (I couldn't figure out a way to 'attach' my patch to that issue, so I'm creating a new one)
* A blog post I wrote a while back about this: https://hackernoon.com/rubys-puts-is-not-atomic-889c57fc9a28
Command I used to run the test I added: `make test-all TESTS='ruby/test_io.rb -n test_puts_parallel'`
I'm a first time contributor, a bit confused as to where a changelog entry should be added. Is the `NEWS` file the right place?
Regards,
Paul
---Files--------------------------------
ruby-changes.patch (2.83 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>