[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83489] [Ruby trunk Feature#2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library
From:
mame@...
Date:
2017-10-22 02:14:09 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83489
Issue #2348 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). Three points: * If RBTree gem is bundled, we will do so by using the (recently-established) framework of bundled gems. * The current framework of bundled gems does not support extension library (maybe). We need to improve the framework first. * After that, we must decide if RBTree gem should be bundled or not. ---------------------------------------- Feature #2348: RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/2348#change-67500 * Author: JEG2 (James Gray) * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) * Target version: next minor ---------------------------------------- =begin The merits of this library have been discussed on Ruby core, with the strengths best summarized by this post: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/26602 RBTree has now been fixed to run on Ruby 1.9: http://github.com/skade/rbtree I think we should now give serious consideration to bringing it into the standard library. =end -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>