[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, normal@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83509] [Ruby trunk Bug#6560][Closed] stdlib/ipaddr: IPSocket.valid? not defined as the documentation says
From:
knu@...
Date:
2017-10-22 16:13:56 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83509
Issue #6560 has been updated by knu (Akinori MUSHA). Status changed from Assigned to Closed Looking back on history, the mentioned part had been removed one week before this issue was filed. (r35865) ---------------------------------------- Bug #6560: stdlib/ipaddr: IPSocket.valid? not defined as the documentation says https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6560#change-67526 * Author: paddor (Patrik Wenger) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: knu (Akinori MUSHA) * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p194 (2012-04-20 revision 35410) [x86_64-darwin11.3.0] * Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The stdlib documentation of "ipaddr" for Ruby 1.9.3 and 1.9.1 both say there's a method IPSocket.valid?. But that's not the case. The same applies for the methods ::valid_ipv4? and ::valid_ipv6?. Tested on the following two Ruby installations: ruby 1.9.3p194 (2012-04-20 revision 35410) [x86_64-darwin11.3.0] ruby 1.9.1p376 (2009-12-07 revision 26041) [x86_64-linux] I had a look at the source file ipaddr.rb and it seems these methods are only defined in case Socket::AF_INET6 is not defined. This doesn't make any sense in my opinion. Thanks in advance. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>