[#62297] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nari@ruby-lang.org wrote:
7 messages
2014/05/02
[#62307] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/05/03
(2014/05/03 4:41), Eric Wong wrote:
[#62402] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/05/05
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62523] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — ko1@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/05/11
[#62556] doxygen (Re: Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-05-11 8:50 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
3 messages
2014/05/13
[#62727] [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
rb_unlink_method_entry may cause old_me to be swept before the new
7 messages
2014/05/24
[#63039] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/10
Hi,
[#63077] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/10
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#63086] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/11
(2014/06/11 4:47), Eric Wong wrote:
[#63087] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/11
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62862] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Any comment on officially supporting this as part of the C API?
5 messages
2014/05/30
[ruby-core:62666] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9842] system configuration variables (sysconf(), confstr(), pathconf() and fpathconf())
From:
usa@...
Date:
2014-05-19 02:18:09 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62666
Issue #9842 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Akira Tanaka wrote:
> I intend this feature (Etc.sysconf, etc.) as low level API.
>
> One of the feature I want is `Etc.confstr(Etc::CS_GNU_LIBC_VERSION)`.
> I feel it is not a good idea to define a high level interface for it.
I see.
> I like functions over command invocation.
> Command invocation depends various fragile factors (PATH, etc.) and difficult to treat errors.
Almost I can agree it.
> Of course, I agree some feature may be appropriate to be defined as high level interface.
> People will find such feature more easily because
> this feature makes low level features more visible.
I was convinced by this explanation. Thank you.
----------------------------------------
Feature #9842: system configuration variables (sysconf(), confstr(), pathconf() and fpathconf())
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9842#change-46801
* Author: Akira Tanaka
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
How about providing methods to obtain system configuration variables?
POSIX defines sysconf(), confstr(), pathconf() and fpathconf().
I implemented following methods in ext/etc.
* Etc.sysconf(name)
* Etc.confstr(name)
* IO.pathconf(name)
* IO#pathconf(name)
POSIX defines some names.
Various operating sysmtems define additional names.
They can be used as follows:
```
Etc.sysconf(Etc::SC_ARG_MAX) #=> 2097152
Etc.sysconf(Etc::SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN) #=> 4
Etc.confstr(Etc::CS_PATH) #=> "/bin:/usr/bin"
Etc.confstr(Etc::CS_GNU_LIBC_VERSION) #=> "glibc 2.18"
IO.pathconf("/", Etc::PC_NAME_MAX) #=> 255
open("/") {|f| p f.pathconf(Etc::PC_TIMESTAMP_RESOLUTION) } #=> 1
```
I implemented them in ext/etc because I interpreted "etc" as
system configuration.
Any idea?
---Files--------------------------------
sysconf-confstr-pathconf.patch (13 KB)
sysconf-confstr-fpathconf.patch (12.1 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/