[#62297] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nari@ruby-lang.org wrote:
7 messages
2014/05/02
[#62307] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/05/03
(2014/05/03 4:41), Eric Wong wrote:
[#62402] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/05/05
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62523] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — ko1@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/05/11
[#62556] doxygen (Re: Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-05-11 8:50 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
3 messages
2014/05/13
[#62727] [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
rb_unlink_method_entry may cause old_me to be swept before the new
7 messages
2014/05/24
[#63039] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/10
Hi,
[#63077] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/10
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#63086] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/11
(2014/06/11 4:47), Eric Wong wrote:
[#63087] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/11
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62862] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Any comment on officially supporting this as part of the C API?
5 messages
2014/05/30
[ruby-core:62496] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9823] Segmentation fault using DL
From:
chrahunt@...
Date:
2014-05-10 04:32:37 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62496
Issue #9823 has been updated by Christopher Hunt. Additionally, you may find the errors for 1.9.3 and 2.1.2 here: https://gist.github.com/chrahunt/5af5639f6410ee87919c. ---------------------------------------- Bug #9823: Segmentation fault using DL https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9823#change-46658 * Author: Christopher Hunt * Status: Feedback * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Aaron Patterson * Category: ext * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p545 (2014-02-24) [i386-mingw32] * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I receive a segmentation fault when calling OpenProcessToken from DL, demonstrated by running the attached 'runner.rb' file with the additional files in the same directory. This is a simplified representation, but perhaps not minimal, though with good reason. Doing any one of the following prevents a segmentation fault: Copying line 3 from runner.rb to the bottom of mwe.rb and running mwe.rb directly. Commenting out line 5 of mwe.rb or commenting out some large subset of errors.rb (e.g. commenting out lines 37 through 99 result in no segfault). Commenting out line 3 of runner.rb, in effect only requiring the other files and exiting. Commenting out a combination of the following from within Pageant::Win results in no segfault: - Calls to extern - Calls to struct - Constants - Class methods In the last case it is not necessary to comment out all of the items of a particular category. For instance, a segfault is avoided if I comment out TOKEN_USER and SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES. I may also prevent a segfault by commenting out TOKEN_USER and the extern statement associated with IsValidSecurityDescriptor. I have also tried this in the latest (ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45867) [i386-mingw32]) with similar results. I've attached the error output for each of 1.9.3 and 2.1.2. ---Files-------------------------------- runner.rb (68 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/