[#62297] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nari@ruby-lang.org wrote:
7 messages
2014/05/02
[#62307] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/05/03
(2014/05/03 4:41), Eric Wong wrote:
[#62402] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/05/05
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62523] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — ko1@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/05/11
[#62556] doxygen (Re: Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-05-11 8:50 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
3 messages
2014/05/13
[#62727] [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
rb_unlink_method_entry may cause old_me to be swept before the new
7 messages
2014/05/24
[#63039] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/10
Hi,
[#63077] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/10
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#63086] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/11
(2014/06/11 4:47), Eric Wong wrote:
[#63087] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/11
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62862] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Any comment on officially supporting this as part of the C API?
5 messages
2014/05/30
[ruby-core:62833] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9875] [Open] ERB#result documentation incorrect
From:
mlorenz@...
Date:
2014-05-29 04:27:52 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62833
Issue #9875 has been reported by Mark Lorenz. ---------------------------------------- Bug #9875: ERB#result documentation incorrect https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9875 * Author: Mark Lorenz * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Eric Hodel * Category: doc * Target version: * ruby -v: 2.1.1p76 and 1.9.3p484 verified * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- This issue duplicates: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/619 --- ERB#result does not accept a proc, the documentation says: > Executes the generated ERB code to produce a completed template, returning the results of that code. > (See ::new for details on how this process can be affected by safe_level.) > b accepts a Binding object which is used to set the context of code evaluation. However, #result delegates to Kernel.eval, which says: > Evaluates the Ruby expression(s) in string. If binding is given, which > must be a Binding object... When given a proc, #eval errors with: > ruby-2.1.1/lib/ruby/2.1.0/erb.rb:847:in `eval': wrong argument type proc (expected binding) (TypeError) I verified on 2.1.1 and 1.9.3p484 Patch included. ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-ERB-result-does-not-accept-a-proc.patch (2.27 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/