[#62297] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nari@ruby-lang.org wrote:
7 messages
2014/05/02
[#62307] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/05/03
(2014/05/03 4:41), Eric Wong wrote:
[#62402] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/05/05
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62523] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — ko1@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/05/11
[#62556] doxygen (Re: Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-05-11 8:50 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
3 messages
2014/05/13
[#62727] [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
rb_unlink_method_entry may cause old_me to be swept before the new
7 messages
2014/05/24
[#63039] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/10
Hi,
[#63077] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/10
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#63086] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/11
(2014/06/11 4:47), Eric Wong wrote:
[#63087] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/11
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62862] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Any comment on officially supporting this as part of the C API?
5 messages
2014/05/30
[ruby-core:62299] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9795] [Open] ruby-head breaks spreadsheet gem
From:
niklaus.giger@...
Date:
2014-05-02 20:28:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62299
Issue #9795 has been reported by Niklaus Giger. ---------------------------------------- Bug #9795: ruby-head breaks spreadsheet gem https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9795 * Author: Niklaus Giger * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-03-29 trunk 45468) * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- When Zeno commit a comment with https://github.com/zdavatz/spreadsheet/commit/9b08dceecf634139f819d1f9dcd0dbcdf10b4dbd on Wed Apr 2 19:00:32 2014 +0200 Our travis-ci build https://travis-ci.org/zdavatz/spreadsheet/builds/22119822 failed using ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-04-02 trunk 45502) [x86_64-linux]. The previous commit https://github.com/zdavatz/spreadsheet/commit/c901cd3f26191f33ff23301e757093d537425771 passed the travis-ci build https://travis-ci.org/zdavatz/spreadsheet/jobs/19648087 (about 2 months ago with ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-02-26 trunk 45182) [x86_64-linux]) The problem persists and is reproducible with ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-05-02 trunk 45788) [x86_64-linux],too. We don't mind to adapt to Ruby 2.2 a few things, but I have no hint, which new feature broke the builds or whether it is really a bug. Any hint would be very helpful for us. Thanks in advance for your work! Trying to narrow done the first occurrence I found that ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-03-29 trunk 45468) [x86_64-linux] https://travis-ci.org/ngiger/oddb2xml/jobs/21936566#L56 broke a different gem, too. Whhich leaves you still over 100 commits to look for. But may be you have a script for bisecting. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/