[#62297] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nari@ruby-lang.org wrote:
7 messages
2014/05/02
[#62307] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/05/03
(2014/05/03 4:41), Eric Wong wrote:
[#62402] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/05/05
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62523] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — ko1@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/05/11
[#62556] doxygen (Re: Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-05-11 8:50 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
3 messages
2014/05/13
[#62727] [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
rb_unlink_method_entry may cause old_me to be swept before the new
7 messages
2014/05/24
[#63039] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/10
Hi,
[#63077] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/10
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#63086] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/11
(2014/06/11 4:47), Eric Wong wrote:
[#63087] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/11
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62862] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Any comment on officially supporting this as part of the C API?
5 messages
2014/05/30
[ruby-core:62591] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9835] IGNORE signal handler has possible race condition in Ruby 2.1.2
From:
normalperson@...
Date:
2014-05-14 19:28:38 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62591
Issue #9835 has been updated by Eric Wong.
It looks like a race condition in your code. You were lucky to not hit
it in 1.8.7 or with a different use of trap (because execution speeds
may be different different).
parent execution timeline
-----------------------------+
trap(USR1, show_children) |
|
fork ------------------------+-- child execution timeline -----
|
*** kill(USR1, -getpgid($$)) | trap(USR1, IGNORE)
|
Once you fork, parent and child run in parallel. So the order of
execution where '***' is highlighted is outside your control.
So to ensure your child ignores properly, you must setup the ignore
handler before forking. There will always be a moment in time where
the parent and child will have the same signal handler.
You also do not want to a signal in the parent which arrive immediately
before or after the fork, either. So I suggest something like the
following to defer signals in the parent:
# note: this count nals in general) is racy
usr1_queue = []
show_children = trap("USR1") { usr1_queue << nil } # defer signals
pid = fork
if pid # parent
trap("USR1", show_children) # restore immediate handling
# process deferred signals
usr1_queue.each { show_children.call }
usr1_queue.clear
...
else # child
trap("USR1", "IGNORE")
# do nothing with usr1_queue here, implicitly ignored
...
end
----------------------------------------
Bug #9835: IGNORE signal handler has possible race condition in Ruby 2.1.2
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9835#change-46734
* Author: Kyle Smith
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Low
* Assignee:
* Category: core
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I'm migrating an application from 1.8.7 to 2.1.1/2.1.2, so I'm not sure when this was introduced. Attached is a demo program with some notes about how the IGNORE option to Signal.trap seems to have a race condition whereby receiving that signal shortly after that call, it raises a SignalException with the message including only the name of the signal it received. However, if you trap the signal with an empty block, that race does not occur.
I've tested the attached program on 1.8.7 (no issue), 2.1.1 (issue) and 2.1.2 (issue) on a Linux system (Ubuntu lucid).
---Files--------------------------------
test.rb (1.37 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/