[#62297] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nari@ruby-lang.org wrote:
7 messages
2014/05/02
[#62307] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/05/03
(2014/05/03 4:41), Eric Wong wrote:
[#62402] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/05/05
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62523] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — ko1@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/05/11
[#62556] doxygen (Re: Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-05-11 8:50 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
3 messages
2014/05/13
[#62727] [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
rb_unlink_method_entry may cause old_me to be swept before the new
7 messages
2014/05/24
[#63039] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/10
Hi,
[#63077] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/10
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#63086] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/11
(2014/06/11 4:47), Eric Wong wrote:
[#63087] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/11
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#62862] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Any comment on officially supporting this as part of the C API?
5 messages
2014/05/30
[ruby-core:62840] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9878] ruby_signal() should return either sa_sigaction or sa_handler, depending on SA_SIGINFO
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2014-05-29 14:33:51 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62840
Issue #9878 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN to 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
Bug #9878: ruby_signal() should return either sa_sigaction or sa_handler, depending on SA_SIGINFO
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9878#change-46960
* Author: Rei Odaira
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-05-29 trunk 46222) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
`ruby_signal()` in signal.c returns `old.sa_handler`,
but it should return either `old.sa_sigaction` or `old.sa_handler`,
depending on whether `SA_SIGINFO` is set in `old.sa_flags`.
~~~diff
--- signal.c (revision 46222)
+++ signal.c (working copy)
@@ -595,7 +595,10 @@
rb_bug_errno("sigaction", errno);
}
}
- return old.sa_handler;
+ if (old.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
+ return (sighandler_t)old.sa_sigaction;
+ else
+ return old.sa_handler;
}
sighandler_t
~~~
The original code happens to be correct on the environments
where `sa_handler` and `sa_sigaction` are union, but it is not
guaranteed in general.
(Actually, they are not union on z/OS.)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/