[#41431] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

27 messages 2011/12/01
[#41442] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/01

[#41443] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/01

Maybe we can add a new arity_range method that does this?

[#41496] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714][Open] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

22 messages 2011/12/06

[#41511] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Nick Quaranto <nick@...>

13 messages 2011/12/07

[#41557] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

14 messages 2011/12/08

[#41586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Open] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

17 messages 2011/12/10

[#41672] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Open] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

13 messages 2011/12/15

[#41681] Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

Since Ruby is built on top of simple concepts, most of the documentation

23 messages 2011/12/15
[#41683] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/15

[#41686] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/16

Em 15-12-2011 19:23, Gary Wright escreveu:

[#41717] Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...>

In Windows, when using File.join, one often ends with a path containing

13 messages 2011/12/19
[#41719] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com> wrot=

[#41720] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/19

Luis Lavena wrote in post #1037331:

[#41728] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781][Open] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

15 messages 2011/12/19

[#41799] Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2011/12/24
[#41800] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/24

2011/12/24 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#41811] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/26

Hello,

[#41817] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/26

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:51 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

[#41812] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Open] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

11 messages 2011/12/26

[ruby-core:41507] [Backport93 - Backport #5704] Please backport r33937

From: Jon Forums <redmine@...>
Date: 2011-12-06 17:19:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #41507
Issue #5704 has been updated by Jon Forums.


FYI, in the hope that it helps with backporting, a branch containing Hiroshi's patch is being maintained at

https://github.com/thecodeshop/ruby/commits/winio/ruby_1_9_3/

The branch also contains backports of r33200 and r33662 so that the following tests pass when building with the RubyInstaller build recipes on Win7 32bit SP1:

make test-all TESTS='openssl fiddle psych zlib io ruby/test_io.rb ruby/test_io_m17n.rb ruby/test_file.rb'
make test
----------------------------------------
Backport #5704: Please backport r33937
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5704

Author: Luis Lavena
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Yuki Sonoda
Category: 
Target version: 


Hello,

r33937 contains what was labeled 'feature' for ruby-trunk (Issue #5562), however, it was considered a bug and acknowledged by developers in #1332

Quoting Yusuke Endoh:

"Yes, text mode is still 10x -- 30x slower than binary mode.
It is reproduced not only on windows but also Linux.
Perhaps, this is the symptom because of the reason explained
in [ruby-core:26515]."

And quoting Usaku Nakamura:

"Currently, we has implemented the newline conversion as a
transcode converter, just like encoding conversion.
But the design of transcode is too general to use it such
a simple operation, as our finding.
We want to find a better mechanism which doesn't deviate
from the current design of IO..."

The patch provided by Hiroshi Shirosaki speeds up both file read and write operations under Windows to decent levels while do not deviate from current IO design.

Please consider this for backporting as we see it as Bug and not Feature.


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread