From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Date: 2011-12-16T12:43:53+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:41687] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc)

Em 16-12-2011 01:39, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas escreveu:
> ...def my_method(b, callback#Lambda)
>     # callback here can't be a proc so you can be sure that it won't 
> return from your method
>     # I'm using argument#type as a possible syntax for indicating the 
> type checking made by the Ruby interpreter...
>     # I'm also supposing that proc{} would create a Proc, while 
> lambda{} would create a Lambda...
> end

Please ignore the callback#Lambda, as # is already used by comments. It 
is late here and I'm already tired :)

Maybe "callback <- Lambda" or anything else... Don't take this 
seriously, it was used only to demonstrate an idea. I don't really 
believe Ruby will support optionally typed variables, arguments and 
return values any day in the next few years, at least...