ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#41421] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5653] "I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries" (Re: autoload will be dead) — Stephen Touset <stephen@...>

1 message 2011/12/01

[#41423] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5653] "I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries" (Re: autoload will be dead) — Stephen Touset <stephen@...>

1 message 2011/12/01

[#41425] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2740] Extend const_missing to pass in the nesting — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

1 message 2011/12/01

[#41426] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5653] "I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries" (Re: autoload will be dead) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

1 message 2011/12/01

[#41427] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5693][Assigned] clang warning in bigdecimal — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>

1 message 2011/12/01

[#41431] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

27 messages 2011/12/01
[#41552] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/12/08

[#41442] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/01

[#41443] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/01

Maybe we can add a new arity_range method that does this?
[#41446] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/12/02

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
[#41450] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/02

You could probably extract the information from #parameters, yeah.
[#41452] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Trans <transfire@...> 2011/12/02

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
[#41454] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/02

Yeah=85 it would be nice to be able to do:
[#41471] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/04

(2011/12/03 4:20), Yehuda Katz wrote:
[#41477] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Trans <transfire@...> 2011/12/04

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:41 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#41472] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/04

I like it!
[#41482] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/04

(2011/12/04 12:41), NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#41505] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — trans <transfire@...> 2011/12/06

[#41510] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/12/07

[#41589] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/12/11

[#41590] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Rejected] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/11

[#41593] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/12/11

[#41595] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/11

Hi,
[#41600] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/12/12

[#41602] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/12

Hi,
[#41708] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/12/17

Hi,
[#42593] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2012/02/14

[#42692] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@...> 2012/02/16

[#46424] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...> 2012/07/14

[#46513] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...> 2012/07/16

[#46515] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...> 2012/07/16

[#46516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...> 2012/07/16

[#41432] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5653] "I strongly discourage the use of autoload in any standard libraries" (Re: autoload will be dead) — Stephen Touset <stephen@...>

1 message 2011/12/01

[#41435] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5695][Open] CoffeeScript "is" and "isnt" keywords — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

6 messages 2011/12/01
[#41436] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5695] CoffeeScript "is" and "isnt" keywords — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/12/01

[#41439] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5695] CoffeeScript "is" and "isnt" keywords — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/01

I'm not in favor of this proposal, but I don't think it would break these
[#41491] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5695][Open] CoffeeScript "is" and "isnt" keywords — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/12/05

On 01/12/11 18:52, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
[#41506] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5695][Open] CoffeeScript "is" and "isnt" keywords — trans <transfire@...> 2011/12/06

Indeed, I have aliased `#is` to `#include` and aliased `#is?` as `#===`
[#43761] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5695][Rejected] CoffeeScript "is" and "isnt" keywords — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/27

[#41437] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5696][Open] rexml BaseParser uses instance_eval unnecessarily on listener add — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

1 message 2011/12/01

[#41438] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5697][Open] Wrong flag for enabling PIE executables with clang — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

5 messages 2011/12/01
[#41448] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5697][Closed] Wrong flag for enabling PIE executables with clang — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/02

[#41449] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5697][Open] Wrong flag for enabling PIE executables with clang — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/02

[#42151] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5697][Closed] Wrong flag for enabling PIE executables with clang — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2012/01/16

[#42152] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5697] Wrong flag for enabling PIE executables with clang — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2012/01/16

[#41440] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #5698][Open] rexml Encoding logic creates unnecessary singleton classes, aliases at runtime — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

4 messages 2011/12/01
[#41441] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #5698] rexml Encoding logic creates unnecessary singleton classes, aliases at runtime — Charles Nutter <headius@...> 2011/12/01

[#49441] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #5698] rexml Encoding logic creates unnecessary singleton classes, aliases at runtime — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...> 2012/11/16

[#49464] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #5698][Rejected] rexml Encoding logic creates unnecessary singleton classes, aliases at runtime — "kou (Kouhei Sutou)" <kou@...> 2012/11/16

[#41456] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5700][Open] fork {} segfaults during VM cleanup when run inside Fiber — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

6 messages 2011/12/03
[#42417] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5700][Open] fork {} segfaults during VM cleanup when run inside Fiber — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/02/07

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#42468] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5700] fork {} segfaults during VM cleanup when run inside Fiber — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2012/02/10

[#42499] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5700] fork {} segfaults during VM cleanup when run inside Fiber — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/02/11

Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@gmail.com> wrote:
[#42511] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5700] fork {} segfaults during VM cleanup when run inside Fiber — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2012/02/13

[#42586] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5700] fork {} segfaults during VM cleanup when run inside Fiber — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2012/02/14

[#41458] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5701][Open] Compilation under Lion with clang 2.1 fails — Cake Pie <7t3rf0x@...>

4 messages 2011/12/03
[#41465] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5701][Feedback] Compilation under Lion with clang 2.1 fails — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/03

[#41462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5701] Compilation under Lion with clang 2.1 fails — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/03

[#44375] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5701][Rejected] Compilation under Lion with clang 2.1 fails — "naruse (Yui NARUSE)" <naruse@...> 2012/04/16

[#41463] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5703][Open] Ruby 1.9.3p0 segmentation fault (during autoload?) — Bryan Helmkamp <bryan@...>

3 messages 2011/12/03
[#56422] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5703][Feedback] Ruby 1.9.3p0 segmentation fault (during autoload?) — "naruse (Yui NARUSE)" <naruse@...> 2013/08/07

[#87532] [Ruby trunk Bug#5703][Rejected] Ruby 1.9.3p0 segmentation fault (during autoload?) — mame@... 2018/06/20

Issue #5703 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

[#41468] [Backport93 - Backport #5704][Open] Please backport r33937 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

6 messages 2011/12/04
[#41507] [Backport93 - Backport #5704] Please backport r33937 — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/12/06

[#41777] [Backport93 - Backport #5704] Please backport r33937 — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/12/22

[#41883] [Backport93 - Backport #5704] Please backport r33937 (newline decorator) — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/01/03

[#42353] [Backport93 - Backport #5704] Please backport r33937 (newline decorator) — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2012/02/04

[#42371] [Backport93 - Backport #5704][Assigned] Please backport r33937 (newline decorator) — Usaku NAKAMURA <usa@...> 2012/02/06

[#41475] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5706][Open] Build failure on io/wait extension with VC 2010 — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

2 messages 2011/12/04
[#41488] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5706][Assigned] Build failure on io/wait extension with VC 2010 — Usaku NAKAMURA <usa@...> 2011/12/05

[#41478] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5707][Open] temporary file creation without finalizer and delegate. — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>

7 messages 2011/12/04
[#41481] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5707][Open] temporary file creation without finalizer and delegate. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/12/04

Akira Tanaka <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#41484] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5707][Open] temporary file creation without finalizer and delegate. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/12/05

2011/12/5 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#41489] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5707][Open] temporary file creation without finalizer and delegate. — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/05

>> Since Tempfile.new already takes an optional hash,
[#54481] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5707][Open] temporary file creation without finalizer and delegate. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2013/04/20

2011/12/5 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>:
[#43763] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5707][Assigned] temporary file creation without finalizer and delegate. — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/27

[#43784] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5707][Assigned] temporary file creation without finalizer and delegate. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2012/03/28

2012/3/28 mame (Yusuke Endoh) <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:

[#41479] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5709][Open] Improve Regexp documentation — Sylvain Daubert <sylvain.daubert@...>

2 messages 2011/12/04
[#41531] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5709] Improve Regexp documentation — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/12/07

[#41486] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5710][Open] Enumerable#each( :method ) and Enumerable#map( :method ) — Matías Battocchia <matias@...>

4 messages 2011/12/05
[#41487] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5710] Enumerable#each( :method ) and Enumerable#map( :method ) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/05

[#41525] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5710] Enumerable#each( :method ) and Enumerable#map( :method ) — Matías Battocchia <matias@...> 2011/12/07

[#41535] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5710][Closed] Enumerable#each( :method ) and Enumerable#map( :method ) — Martin Dürst <duerst@...> 2011/12/08

[#41494] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5713][Open] Fixnum#** returns Infinity for 0 ** negative Bignum — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...>

5 messages 2011/12/06
[#41553] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5713] Fixnum#** returns Infinity for 0 ** negative Bignum — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/12/08

[#41571] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5713] Fixnum#** returns Infinity for 0 ** negative Bignum — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...> 2011/12/09

[#41573] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5713] Fixnum#** returns Infinity for 0 ** negative Bignum — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/12/09

[#41580] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5713] Fixnum#** returns Infinity for 0 ** negative Bignum — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...> 2011/12/09

[#41496] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714][Open] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

22 messages 2011/12/06
[#41500] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2011/12/06

[#41501] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/06

Hello,
[#41503] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/06

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:18 AM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#41514] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/07

Hi,
[#41523] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2011/12/07

>
[#41536] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2011/12/08

Hi,
[#41542] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2011/12/08

[#41578] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/09

[#41601] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/12

Hello,
[#41609] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/12

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:42 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#41620] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2011/12/13

Hi,
[#41583] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2011/12/10

[#41628] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2011/12/13

[#41629] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/13

Hello,
[#41641] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2011/12/14

[#41650] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/14

Hello,
[#41671] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2011/12/15

[#41684] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/16

Hello,
[#41689] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2011/12/16

Hello,
[#41714] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/19

Hello,
[#41805] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...> 2011/12/25

[#41498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5715][Open] +/-1 ** Bignum returns different results than +/-1 ** Fixnum — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...>

4 messages 2011/12/06
[#41572] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5715] +/-1 ** Bignum returns different results than +/-1 ** Fixnum — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...> 2011/12/09

[#41574] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5715] +/-1 ** Bignum returns different results than +/-1 ** Fixnum — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/12/09

[#51657] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5715] +/-1 ** Bignum returns different results than +/-1 ** Fixnum — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...> 2013/01/25

[#41502] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5716][Open] duplicated when clause is ignored -> Report which clause it is specifically. — markus heiler <shevegen@...>

4 messages 2011/12/06
[#43764] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5716][Assigned] duplicated when clause is ignored -> Report which clause it is specifically. — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/27

[#44210] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5716][Open] duplicated when clause is ignored -> Report which clause it is specifically. — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/04/09

Thank you for your comment.
[#44215] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5716] duplicated when clause is ignored -> Report which clause it is specifically. — "shevegen (markus heiler)" <shevegen@...> 2012/04/09

[#41511] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Nick Quaranto <nick@...>

13 messages 2011/12/07
[#50132] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/11/26

[#41512] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — John Glass <glassj67@...> 2011/12/07

[#41513] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/07

Hi,
[#41515] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Gabriel Gironda <gabriel.gironda@...> 2011/12/07

[#41516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Bharanee Rathna <deepfryed@...> 2011/12/07

[#41517] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2011/12/07

The bug comes from this code: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/vm_insnhelper.c#L275-296
[#41518] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2011/12/07

The bug comes from this code: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/vm_insnhelper.c#L275-296
[#41519] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Martin Dürst <duerst@...> 2011/12/07

[#42886] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/02/25

(2011/12/07 14:26), Martin Dürst wrote:
[#43014] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...> 2012/02/29

Hello Koichi,
[#42887] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2012/02/25

[#79353] [Ruby trunk Bug#5719][Closed] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — ko1@... 2017/01/31

Issue #5719 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.

[#41520] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5720][Open] Exceptions can be caused via eval that evade exception handling — Gabriel Gironda <gabriel.gironda@...>

4 messages 2011/12/07
[#73731] [Ruby trunk Bug#5720] Exceptions can be caused via eval that evade exception handling — headius@... 2016/02/07

Issue #5720 has been updated by Charles Nutter.
[#73740] [Ruby trunk Bug#5720] Exceptions can be caused via eval that evade exception handling — nobu@... 2016/02/08

Issue #5720 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#73941] [Ruby trunk Bug#5720] Exceptions can be caused via eval that evade exception handling — usa@... 2016/02/23

Issue #5720 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#41522] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5721][Open] require_relative — rommel nocando <redmine@...>

5 messages 2011/12/07
[#41532] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5721][Open] require_relative — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/12/08

2011/12/7 rommel nocando <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#41533] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5721][Feedback] require_relative — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/12/08

[#41534] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5721] require_relative — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/08

[#48612] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5721][Rejected] require_relative — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/10/30

[#41524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5723][Open] Ruby fails when standard input is closed — Randal Moore <rdmoore@...>

5 messages 2011/12/07
[#41527] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5723] Ruby fails when standard input is closed — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/07

[#41555] [Backport93 - Backport #5723] Ruby fails when standard input is closed — Randal Moore <rdmoore@...> 2011/12/08

[#41898] [Backport93 - Backport #5723] Backport r33567 and r33573 (Ruby fails when standard input is closed) — Ayumu AIZAWA <ayumu.aizawa@...> 2012/01/04

[#42378] [Backport93 - Backport #5723][Closed] Backport r33567 and r33573 (Ruby fails when standard input is closed) — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/02/06

[#41529] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5724][Open] date_core compiling issues with MinGW GCC 4.6 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

2 messages 2011/12/07
[#41651] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5724][Rejected] date_core compiling issues with MinGW GCC 4.6 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/14

[#41537] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Steve Hart <steve@...>

1 message 2011/12/08

[#41541] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5726][Open] Process::EXIT_SUCCESS and Process::EXIT_FAILURE — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>

4 messages 2011/12/08
[#41543] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5726][Feedback] Process::EXIT_SUCCESS and Process::EXIT_FAILURE — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/08

[#41547] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5726][Feedback] Process::EXIT_SUCCESS and Process::EXIT_FAILURE — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/12/08

2011/12/8 Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>:
[#49684] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5726][Closed] Process::EXIT_SUCCESS and Process::EXIT_FAILURE — "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...> 2012/11/20

[#41545] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5727][Open] Hidden bug in load.c rb_feature_p — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

1 message 2011/12/08

[#41556] Error when loading a converter — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>

I think this might be a bug, but I'm not sure. The following code

1 message 2011/12/08

[#41557] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

14 messages 2011/12/08
[#41558] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2011/12/09

On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 08:59:26AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#41559] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/12/09

2011/12/9 Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>:
[#41560] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/09

Hi,
[#41568] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/12/09

2011/12/9 Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>:
[#41570] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/09

Hi,
[#41582] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/10

Hi,
[#41561] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — =?windows-1252?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?= <matthias@...> 2011/12/09

Hi Matz,
[#41563] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/09

Hi,
[#41567] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Matthias Wächter <matthias@...> 2011/12/09

Matz,
[#41565] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/12/09

2011/12/9 Matthias W=E4chter <matthias@waechter.wiz.at>:
[#41562] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/12/09

What would be the wantend behavior of this code:
[#41564] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/09

Hi,
[#41566] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/12/09

[#41575] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5736][Open] Numeric#quo should convert with #to_r — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...>

2 messages 2011/12/09
[#41576] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5736] Numeric#quo should convert with #to_r — John Firebaugh <john.firebaugh@...> 2011/12/09

[#41579] rb_require, search_required and design questions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

1 message 2011/12/09

[#41581] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5737][Open] WEBrick doesn't support keep alive connections for 204 and 304 responses — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

8 messages 2011/12/10
[#41617] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5737][Closed] WEBrick doesn't support keep alive connections for 204 and 304 responses — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/12/12

[#41621] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5737][Open] WEBrick doesn't support keep alive connections for 204 and 304 responses — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/12/13

[#41624] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5737][Open] WEBrick doesn't support keep alive connections for 204 and 304 responses — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2011/12/13

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:35:16AM +0900, Hiroshi Nakamura wrote:
[#41636] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5737] WEBrick doesn't support keep alive connections for 204 and 304 responses — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/12/14

[#41665] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5737] WEBrick doesn't support keep alive connections for 204 and 304 responses — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/12/15

[#87533] [Ruby trunk Bug#5737] WEBrick doesn't support keep alive connections for 204 and 304 responses — mame@... 2018/06/20

Issue #5737 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
[#87607] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#5737] WEBrick doesn't support keep alive connections for 204 and 304 responses — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2018/06/23

mame@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#41584] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5739] [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase — Fused Team <admins@...>

1 message 2011/12/10

[#41585] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5740][Open] Trivial typo in ext/syslog.c — mathew murphy <meta@...>

1 message 2011/12/10

[#41586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Open] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

17 messages 2011/12/10
[#41632] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2011/12/13

[#41715] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@...> 2011/12/19

Here's my 2 yen.
[#46100] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "kenkeiter (Ken Keiter)" <ken@...> 2012/07/02

[#41736] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2011/12/20

[#41587] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Open] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/12/10

Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@googlemail.com> wrote:
[#41588] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Open] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/12/10

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#41591] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2011/12/11

[#43800] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Assigned] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/28

[#43810] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2012/03/28

[#43817] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...> 2012/03/28

[#43830] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2012/03/28

[#44714] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2012/04/28

[#46198] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2012/07/05

[#48361] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/26

[#49792] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "MartinBosslet (Martin Bosslet)" <Martin.Bosslet@...> 2012/11/21

[#49981] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741] Secure Erasure of Passwords — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/24

[#41592] My bug evaluation criteria — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

I don't think there is an official way to judge a bug, but for me it

4 messages 2011/12/11
[#41599] Re: My bug evaluation criteria — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/12

Thank you for documentation,
[#41712] Re: My bug evaluation criteria — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/12/18

Hi,
[#41758] Re: My bug evaluation criteria — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/20

(2011/12/18 13:53), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:

[#41594] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5746][Open] Proc#curry too strict about lambda's arity. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

7 messages 2011/12/11
[#41596] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5746][Open] Proc#curry too strict about lambda's arity. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/11

Hi,
[#41598] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5746][Open] Proc#curry too strict about lambda's arity. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/12/12

Hi,
[#44586] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5746] Proc#curry too strict about lambda's arity. — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/04/24

[#46423] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5746] Proc#curry too strict about lambda's arity. — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/07/14

[#46514] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5746] Proc#curry too strict about lambda's arity. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...> 2012/07/16

[#51658] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5746][Closed] Proc#curry too strict about lambda's arity. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...> 2013/01/25

[#41597] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5747][Open] Proc#curry doesn't always detect too many arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

3 messages 2011/12/12
[#42889] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5747] Proc#curry doesn't always detect too many arguments — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2012/02/25

[#42907] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5747] Proc#curry doesn't always detect too many arguments — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2012/02/25

[#41603] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5749][Open] new method String#match_all needed — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

6 messages 2011/12/12
[#41604] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5749] new method String#match_all needed — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/12/12

[#41605] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5749] new method String#match_all needed — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...> 2011/12/12

[#41611] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5749] new method String#match_all needed — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/12

[#41643] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5749] new method String#match_all needed — Tomoaki Nishiyama <tomoakin@...> 2011/12/14

[#43801] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5749][Assigned] new method String#match_all needed — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/28

[#41606] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5750][Open] Thread.current local-variables behavior — Julien A <schmurfy@...>

6 messages 2011/12/12
[#41607] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5750][Rejected] Thread.current local-variables behavior — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2011/12/12

[#41608] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5750] Thread.current local-variables behavior — Julien A <schmurfy@...> 2011/12/12

[#41610] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5750][Open] Thread.current local-variables behavior — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2011/12/12

[#41697] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5750] Thread.current local-variables behavior — Julien A <schmurfy@...> 2011/12/16

[#42894] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5750] Thread.current local-variables behavior — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2012/02/25

[#41612] Errors raised and rescued in Kernel#loaded file still propagate — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

a.rb:

1 message 2011/12/12

[#41613] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5751][Open] functions unable to handle hashes containing spaces unless wrapped in parenthesis — spencer roan <spencerroan@...>

2 messages 2011/12/12
[#41615] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5751][Rejected] functions unable to handle hashes containing spaces unless wrapped in parenthesis — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/12

[#41616] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5752][Open] Array#delete_if side effects due to changeset r32360 — Thomas Leitner <t_leitner@...>

5 messages 2011/12/12
[#41646] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5752] Array#delete_if side effects due to changeset r32360 — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...> 2011/12/14

[#41647] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5752] Array#delete_if side effects due to changeset r32360 — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...> 2011/12/14

[#41664] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5752][Closed] Array#delete_if side effects due to changeset r32360 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/15

[#67483] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5752] Array#delete_if side effects due to changeset r32360 — akr@... 2015/01/10

Issue #5752 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#41618] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5754][Open] Double require bug in 1.9.3 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>

5 messages 2011/12/12
[#41619] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5754] Double require bug in 1.9.3 — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2011/12/12

[#41655] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5754][Assigned] Double require bug in 1.9.3 — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/12/14

[#41659] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5754][Assigned] Double require bug in 1.9.3 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/14

Hi,
[#41678] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5754] Double require bug in 1.9.3 — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...> 2011/12/15

[#41625] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5755][Assigned] Errors raised and rescued in Kernel#loaded file still propagate — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>

1 message 2011/12/13

[#41626] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756][Open] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — SungHee Kang <paranoiase@...>

11 messages 2011/12/13
[#41627] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756][Feedback] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/12/13

[#41637] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — SungHee Kang <paranoiase@...> 2011/12/14

[#41638] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/12/14

[#41639] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — SungHee Kang <paranoiase@...> 2011/12/14

[#41640] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — SungHee Kang <paranoiase@...> 2011/12/14

[#41649] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/12/14

[#41652] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — SungHee Kang <paranoiase@...> 2011/12/14

[#48613] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756][Assigned] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/10/30

[#48636] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756][Feedback] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — "sorah (Shota Fukumori)" <sorah@...> 2012/10/31

[#51683] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5756][Rejected] crashs when Twitter.update_with_media with rails — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/01/25

[#41630] redmine.ruby-lang.org -> bugs.ruby-lang.org — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2011/12/13
[#41631] Re: redmine.ruby-lang.org -> bugs.ruby-lang.org — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2011/12/13

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:40:04AM +0900, Shugo Maeda wrote:
[#41633] Re: redmine.ruby-lang.org -> bugs.ruby-lang.org — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2011/12/13

Hello,
[#41682] Re: redmine.ruby-lang.org -> bugs.ruby-lang.org — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/12/15

Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#41685] Re: redmine.ruby-lang.org -> bugs.ruby-lang.org — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2011/12/16

Hello,
[#41704] Re: redmine.ruby-lang.org -> bugs.ruby-lang.org — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/17

Hi,

[#41634] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5759][Open] flatten calls to_ary on everything — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

8 messages 2011/12/13
[#41635] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5759] flatten calls to_ary on everything — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/12/14

[#41648] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5759] flatten calls to_ary on everything — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/12/14

On 14/12/11 01:05, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#42690] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5759] flatten calls to_ary on everything — Denis de Bernardy <ddebernardy@...> 2012/02/16

[#51197] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5759][Rejected] flatten calls to_ary on everything — "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...> 2012/12/30

[#51201] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5759] flatten calls to_ary on everything — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...> 2012/12/30

[#51203] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5759] flatten calls to_ary on everything — "bitsweat (Jeremy Kemper)" <jeremy@...> 2012/12/31

[#51227] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5759] flatten calls to_ary on everything — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...> 2013/01/03

[#41645] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5761][Open] Array#flatten(N) calls to_ary on the (N+1)-level objects — Jon Leighton <j@...>

2 messages 2011/12/14
[#44496] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5761][Closed] Array#flatten(N) calls to_ary on the (N+1)-level objects — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/04/20

[#41656] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5763][Open] sprintf not throwing error for wrong number of arguments — NagaChaitanya Vellanki <me@...>

8 messages 2011/12/14
[#41658] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5763] sprintf not throwing error for wrong number of arguments — NagaChaitanya Vellanki <me@...> 2011/12/14

[#41661] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5763] sprintf not throwing error for wrong number of arguments — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/12/15

[#41663] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5763] sprintf not throwing error for wrong number of arguments — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/15

>> check for similar behaviour of sprintf in a c program
[#41666] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5763] sprintf not throwing error for wrong number of arguments — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/12/15

[#41679] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5763] sprintf not throwing error for wrong number of arguments — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/15

> Motohiro KOSAKI wrote:
[#41667] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5763] sprintf not throwing error for wrong number of arguments — NagaChaitanya Vellanki <me@...> 2011/12/15

[#41669] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5763][Closed] sprintf not throwing error for wrong number of arguments — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/15

[#41657] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #5764][Open] Net::HTTP should assume HTTP/0.9 on unexpected responses — Mike Styer <michael@...>

2 messages 2011/12/14
[#93792] [Ruby master Feature#5764] Net::HTTP should assume HTTP/0.9 on unexpected responses — merch-redmine@... 2019/07/15

Issue #5764 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).

[#41662] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765][Open] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

9 messages 2011/12/15
[#42893] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2012/02/25

[#42903] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2012/02/25

2012/2/25 Koichi Sasada <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#42933] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/02/25

Koichi Sasada <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#42939] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2012/02/25

[#42943] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/02/25

Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#42940] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2012/02/25

[#42995] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2012/02/28

[#43010] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5765] [PATCH] modernize Timeout usage in net/{http,pop,smtp,telnet} — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/02/28

Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#41668] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5766][Open] Hash.each_with_object should behave differently when block's arity is 3 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

5 messages 2011/12/15
[#41670] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5766][Open] Hash.each_with_object should behave differently when block's arity is 3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/15

Hi,
[#41676] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5766][Open] Hash.each_with_object should behave differently when block's arity is 3 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/15

Em 15-12-2011 03:14, Yukihiro Matsumoto escreveu:
[#41677] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5766] Hash.each_with_object should behave differently when block's arity is 3 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/15

[#41680] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5766][Closed] Hash.each_with_object should behave differently when block's arity is 3 — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/12/15

[#41672] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Open] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

13 messages 2011/12/15
[#41692] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...> 2011/12/16

[#41673] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Open] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/15

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:18, Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#41674] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Open] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/12/15

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#41675] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...> 2011/12/15

[#41707] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/17

[#42170] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...> 2012/01/18

[#42350] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...> 2012/02/04

[#43973] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Assigned] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/31

[#44000] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...> 2012/03/31

[#44001] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...> 2012/03/31

[#44004] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...> 2012/03/31

[#49625] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Closed] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — "h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki)" <h.shirosaki@...> 2012/11/20

[#41681] Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

Since Ruby is built on top of simple concepts, most of the documentation

23 messages 2011/12/15
[#41683] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/15

[#41686] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/16

Em 15-12-2011 19:23, Gary Wright escreveu:
[#41687] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/16

Em 16-12-2011 01:39, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas escreveu:
[#41688] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/16

[#41690] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Yong Li <gilbertly@...> 2011/12/16

>
[#41694] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...> 2011/12/16

Currently this leads to messy code like
[#41695] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2011/12/16

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Yong Li <gilbertly@gmail.com> wrote:
[#41699] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/16

Em 16-12-2011 02:28, Gary Wright escreveu:
[#41700] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2011/12/16

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com
[#41732] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/12/19

On Dec 15, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#41733] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2011/12/19

On 12/19/11 3:38 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#41734] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/19

Em 19-12-2011 19:38, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#41735] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Jeremy Evans <code@...> 2011/12/19

On 12/20 08:04, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#41738] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/12/20

On Dec 19, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#41753] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/20

Em 19-12-2011 23:35, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#41762] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/12/21

On Dec 20, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#41765] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/21

Em 20-12-2011 23:07, Eric Hodel escreveu:
[#41701] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Sylvain Daubert <sylvain.daubert@...> 2011/12/16

Hi,
[#41705] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...> 2011/12/17

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Sylvain Daubert
[#41706] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/17
[#41709] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/18

[#41731] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2011/12/19

On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Sylvain Daubert wrote:

[#41691] Ruby IRC Presence Problem — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2011/12/16
[#41693] Re: Ruby IRC Presence Problem — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/12/16

Group registration still takes ages, even with that from. We went through i=
[#41698] Re: Ruby IRC Presence Problem — Steve Klabnik <steve@...> 2011/12/16

Recently, they changed something with group registration stuff. I

[#41702] [ruby-trunk - Feature #3620] Add Queue, SIzedQueue and ConditionVariable implementations in C in addition to ruby ones — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

1 message 2011/12/17

[#41703] security disclosure policy — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

In short, I think:

2 messages 2011/12/17
[#41746] Re: security disclosure policy — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/20

Current one is https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/SecurityFixPro=

[#41710] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5773][Open] bigdecimal comparison raises SystemStackError — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

1 message 2011/12/18

[#41711] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5774][Open] [PATCH] xmlrpc client handling cookies — Roman Riha <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/12/18
[#55287] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5774] [PATCH] xmlrpc client handling cookies — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...> 2013/06/04

[#41713] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5775][Open] BigDecimal does not follow Allocation Framework — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

1 message 2011/12/18

[#41717] Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...>

In Windows, when using File.join, one often ends with a path containing

13 messages 2011/12/19
[#41719] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com> wrot=
[#41720] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/19

Luis Lavena wrote in post #1037331:
[#41737] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/20

Hi,
[#41740] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/20

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:12, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#41742] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/20

Hi,
[#41744] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/20

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 08:17, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#41750] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/20

Nikolai Weibull wrote in post #1037488:
[#41751] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/20

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:24, Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com> wrote:
[#41752] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/20

Nikolai Weibull wrote in post #1037513:
[#41722] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/19

> I think I will just use the ordinary File.join, then gsub('/', '\')
[#41727] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com> wro=
[#41729] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 20:46, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#41718] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5777][Open] class_eval/module_eval works differently when given a string than when given a block in 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — George MacKerron <redmine@...>

4 messages 2011/12/19
[#41726] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5777] class_eval/module_eval works differently when given a string than when given a block in 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/19

[#41768] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5777] class_eval/module_eval works differently when given a string than when given a block in 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — George MacKerron <redmine@...> 2011/12/21

[#43332] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5777] class_eval/module_eval works differently when given a string than when given a block in 1.9.2 and 1.9.3 — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2012/03/16

[#41721] Ruby and oniguruma relation. — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>

Hi everybody,

5 messages 2011/12/19
[#41723] Re: Ruby and oniguruma relation. — Ammar Ali <ammarabuali@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:54 PM, V=C3=ADt Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com> wro=
[#41724] Re: Ruby and oniguruma relation. — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/19

(12/19/11 11:13 AM), Ammar Ali wrote:
[#41730] Re: Ruby and oniguruma relation. — Vít Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/12/19

Dne 19.12.2011 17:36, KOSAKI Motohiro napsal(a):
[#41745] Re: Ruby and oniguruma relation. — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/20

2011/12/20 V=EDt Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com>:

[#41725] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5778][Open] Allow WEBrick::HTTPResponse to send IO-duck-typed bodies — Alex Young <alex@...>

6 messages 2011/12/19
[#43802] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5778][Assigned] Allow WEBrick::HTTPResponse to send IO-duck-typed bodies — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/28

[#43836] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5778] Allow WEBrick::HTTPResponse to send IO-duck-typed bodies — "nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura)" <nakahiro@...> 2012/03/29

[#43869] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5778] Allow WEBrick::HTTPResponse to send IO-duck-typed bodies — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/29

[#87535] [Ruby trunk Feature#5778] Allow WEBrick::HTTPResponse to send IO-duck-typed bodies — mame@... 2018/06/20

Issue #5778 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
[#87609] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#5778] Allow WEBrick::HTTPResponse to send IO-duck-typed bodies — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2018/06/23

mame@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#41728] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781][Open] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

15 messages 2011/12/19
[#41754] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781][Assigned] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/12/20

[#41755] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/20

[#41756] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@...> 2011/12/20

On 12/20/2011 08:03 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#41757] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...> 2011/12/20

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@bopp.net> wrote:
[#41759] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/20

[#41760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/20

[#41761] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/12/20

[#41766] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/12/21

[#48362] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/26

[#51098] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...> 2012/12/23

[#51108] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...> 2012/12/24

[#93739] [Ruby master Feature#5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — eregontp@... 2019/07/13

Issue #5781 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
[#93785] [Ruby master Feature#5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — sudo.nice@... 2019/07/15

Issue #5781 has been updated by sudo (Sudo Nice).
[#96755] [Ruby master Feature#5781] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — abaelter@... 2020/01/10

Issue #5781 has been updated by anders (Anders B=E4lter).

[#41767] backport requests for related commits? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

Should each of these related revision pairs be submitted as 1.9.3 backport requests, or should each revision be submitted as a separate backport request...4 or 8 backport requests?

2 messages 2011/12/21
[#41770] Re: backport requests for related commits? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/22

2011/12/22 Jon <jon.forums@gmail.com>:

[#41769] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5787][Assigned] OpenSSL::X509::Name#to_a Improvement (Patch Attached) — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

1 message 2011/12/22

[#41773] [Archive91 - Backport #1942][Closed] irb not running after installation — Kouji Takao <kouji@...7.net>

1 message 2011/12/22

[#41774] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788][Open] Thread#at_exit — Masaki Matsushita <glass.saga@...>

10 messages 2011/12/22
[#41785] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788][Feedback] Thread#at_exit — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/22

[#41793] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788] Thread#at_exit — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/12/24

[#41796] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788] Thread#at_exit — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/24

[#41826] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788] Thread#at_exit — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/12/27

Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#41827] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788] Thread#at_exit — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/27

2011/12/27 Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>:
[#41798] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788] Thread#at_exit — Masaki Matsushita <glass.saga@...> 2011/12/24

[#41823] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788] Thread#at_exit — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/27

[#42309] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788] Thread#at_exit — Masaki Matsushita <glass.saga@...> 2012/02/01

[#49686] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5788] Thread#at_exit — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/20

[#41775] require_relative in eval — Matthias Wächter <matthias@...>

eval() [http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/Kernel.html#method-i-eval]

2 messages 2011/12/22
[#41776] Re: require_relative in eval — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/22

2011/12/22 Matthias W=C3=A4chter <matthias@waechter.wiz.at>:

[#41778] [Backport93 - Backport #5791][Open] Please backport r34043, r34045 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

5 messages 2011/12/22
[#41784] [Backport93 - Backport #5791] Please backport r34043, r34045 — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/12/22

[#41880] [Backport93 - Backport #5791] Please backport r34043, r34045 (Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input) — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/01/03

[#41879] [Backport93 - Backport #5791] Please backport r34043, r34045 — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/01/03

[#42101] [Backport93 - Backport #5791] Please backport r34043, r34045 (Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2012/01/13

[#41779] [Backport93 - Backport #5792][Open] Please backport r33946, r33981 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

4 messages 2011/12/22
[#41783] [Backport93 - Backport #5792] Please backport r33946, r33981 — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/12/22

[#42083] [Backport93 - Backport #5792] Please backport r33946, r33981 (Use GZip::GzReader.open instead of GZip::GzReader.new with File.new) — Ayumu AIZAWA <ayumu.aizawa@...> 2012/01/12

[#42100] [Backport93 - Backport #5792] Please backport r33946, r33981 (Use GZip::GzReader.open instead of GZip::GzReader.new with File.new) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2012/01/13

[#41780] [Backport93 - Backport #5793][Open] Please backport r33662, r33666 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

8 messages 2011/12/22
[#41782] [Backport93 - Backport #5793] Please backport r33662, r33666 — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/12/22

[#41876] [Backport93 - Backport #5793] Please backport r33662, r33666 — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/01/03

[#41877] [Backport93 - Backport #5793] Please backport r33662, r33666 (ECONV_NEWLINE_DECORATOR_{READ,WRITE}_MASK) — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/01/03

[#42092] [Backport93 - Backport #5793] Please backport r33662, r33666 (ECONV_NEWLINE_DECORATOR_{READ,WRITE}_MASK) — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2012/01/12

[#42099] [Backport93 - Backport #5793] Please backport r33662, r33666 (ECONV_NEWLINE_DECORATOR_{READ,WRITE}_MASK) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2012/01/13

[#42485] [Backport93 - Backport #5793] Please backport r33662, r33666 (ECONV_NEWLINE_DECORATOR_{READ,WRITE}_MASK) — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2012/02/10

[#42486] Re: [Backport93 - Backport #5793] Please backport r33662, r33666 (ECONV_NEWLINE_DECORATOR_{READ,WRITE}_MASK) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2012/02/10

Have too much work on my plate and traveling. Hiroshi is the author,

[#41781] [Backport93 - Backport #5794][Open] Please backport r33200 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/12/22
[#41875] [Backport93 - Backport #5794] Please backport r33200 (transcode.c: enabled econv newline option) — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/01/03

[#42098] [Backport93 - Backport #5794] Please backport r33200 (transcode.c: enabled econv newline option) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2012/01/13

[#41786] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5796][Open] main.c is not compiled during cross compilation — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

1 message 2011/12/22

[#41787] Breaking while loading — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

4 messages 2011/12/22
[#41788] Re: Breaking while loading — Satoshi Shiba <shiba@...> 2011/12/23

Hi
[#41789] Re: Breaking while loading — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/12/23

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 07:17, Satoshi Shiba <shiba@rvm.jp> wrote:
[#41790] Re: Breaking while loading — Satoshi Shiba <shiba@...> 2011/12/23

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#41792] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5804][Open] Cannot cross compile trunk using Ruby 1.9.3 as BASERUBY — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

3 messages 2011/12/23
[#41824] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5804][Closed] Cannot cross compile trunk using Ruby 1.9.3 as BASERUBY — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/27

[#41825] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5804] Cannot cross compile trunk using Ruby 1.9.3 as BASERUBY — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/27

[#41794] Re: [ruby-changes:22069] luislavena:r34118 (trunk): * configure.in: add --with-ntver option to match win32/configure.bat — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>

Hi Luis,

2 messages 2011/12/24
[#41795] Re: [ruby-changes:22069] luislavena:r34118 (trunk): * configure.in: add --with-ntver option to match win32/configure.bat — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/24

On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 11:41 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro

[#41797] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805][Open] object_hexid — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

9 messages 2011/12/24
[#41802] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805][Feedback] object_hexid — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/25

[#41803] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805][Feedback] object_hexid — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/12/25

On 2011年12月25日 14:38, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#41806] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805] object_hexid — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/25

[#41807] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805] object_hexid — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/25

[#41810] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805] object_hexid — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/26

[#41990] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805] object_hexid — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2012/01/08

[#41991] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805] object_hexid — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/01/08

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 17:33, Thomas Sawyer <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#49682] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5805] object_hexid — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/20

[#41799] Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2011/12/24
[#41800] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/24

2011/12/24 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:
[#41801] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Steve Klabnik <steve@...> 2011/12/24

The way that this is done in shoes is with a native.h that contains
[#41811] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/26

Hello,
[#41817] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/26

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:51 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#41828] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/27

Hello,
[#41830] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/28

Hello,
[#41831] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/28

Hi,
[#41832] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/28

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> w=
[#41833] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/12/28

Hi,
[#41840] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/29

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> w=
[#41844] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/29

>> For only load_file_ok refactoring, I thought file restructuring is not
[#41918] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2012/01/05

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:18 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
[#41838] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/28

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> w=
[#42895] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/02/25

(2011/12/25 1:21), Luis Lavena wrote:

[#41804] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5798] Range#include? needs some optimization — Alexey Muranov <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/12/25

[#41808] [Archive91 - Backport #5807][Open] "define_method" not consistent with "def" — Silvio Cordeiro <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/12/25
[#41809] [Archive91 - Backport #5807][Rejected] "define_method" not consistent with "def" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/12/25

[#41812] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Open] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

11 messages 2011/12/26
[#41837] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/12/28

[#41872] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Open] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2012/01/02

Yui NARUSE wrote:
[#41907] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2012/01/05

[#43933] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Feedback] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — "naruse (Yui NARUSE)" <naruse@...> 2012/03/30

[#41819] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/12/26

[#41816] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/26

[#43805] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Assigned] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/28

[#43852] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...> 2012/03/29

[#49727] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/20

[#66148] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809] [Closed] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — eregontp@... 2014/11/08

Issue #5809 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.

[#41821] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5813][Assigned] net/http's EOFError and Keep-Alive — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>

1 message 2011/12/27

[#41829] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5817][Open] [mingw] ruby/test_file.rb error in test_chmod_m17n(TestFile) — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/12/27

[#41836] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5818] Feature: Raiseable — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

1 message 2011/12/28

[#41841] YAML has become very slow under 1.9 — j.wuttke <j.wuttke@...>

The simple script

7 messages 2011/12/29
[#41842] Re: YAML has become very slow under 1.9 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/29

Em 29-12-2011 14:46, j.wuttke escreveu:
[#41843] Re: YAML has become very slow under 1.9 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/12/29

(2011/12/30 1:46), j.wuttke wrote:
[#41853] Re: YAML has become very slow under 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2011/12/30

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:46:11AM +0900, j.wuttke wrote:
[#41854] another YAML problem: read-write cycle messes up human readability — "Joachim Wuttke <j.wuttke@...>" <j.wuttke@...> 2011/12/30

Out of desperation, I am currently storing data lines like
[#41855] Re: YAML has become very slow under 1.9 — "Joachim Wuttke <j.wuttke@...>" <j.wuttke@...> 2011/12/30

Aaron, thank you for your answer.
[#41857] Re: YAML has become very slow under 1.9 — Zachary Scott <zachary@...> 2011/12/30

Here are some benchmarks:

[#41845] Fwd: redmine cert expired — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

1 message 2011/12/30

[#41847] Exposing rb_hash_start(), rb_hash_uint(), and rb_hash_end() as Hash::Value — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

Hi!

1 message 2011/12/30

[#41848] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5826][Open] When the RUBY API_VERSION will be increased? — Ayumu AIZAWA <ayumu.aizawa@...>

5 messages 2011/12/30
[#41856] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5826] When the RUBY API_VERSION will be increased? — Ayumu AIZAWA <ayumu.aizawa@...> 2011/12/30

[#41921] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5826][Assigned] When the RUBY API_VERSION will be increased? — Ayumu AIZAWA <ayumu.aizawa@...> 2012/01/05

[#41926] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5826][Assigned] When the RUBY API_VERSION will be increased? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2012/01/05

> I think RUBY_API_VERSION should be 2.0.0 for Ruby2.0.0.
[#41942] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5826][Closed] When the RUBY API_VERSION will be increased? — Ayumu AIZAWA <ayumu.aizawa@...> 2012/01/06

[#41850] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5825] Sweet instance var assignment in the object initializer — Eero Saynatkari <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/12/30

[#41851] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5825] Sweet instance var assignment in the object initializer — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

1 message 2011/12/30

[#41858] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5828][Open] Non anonymous classes can't be frozen, cloned and then inspected — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>

5 messages 2011/12/31
[#62418] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5828] [Feedback] Non anonymous classes can't be frozen, cloned and then inspected — akr@... 2014/05/06

Issue #5828 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#62432] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5828] Non anonymous classes can't be frozen, cloned and then inspected — andrew.j.grimm@... 2014/05/06

Issue #5828 has been updated by Andrew Grimm.
[#62973] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5828] [Closed] Non anonymous classes can't be frozen, cloned and then inspected — akr@... 2014/06/07

Issue #5828 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.
[#62974] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5828] Non anonymous classes can't be frozen, cloned and then inspected — akr@... 2014/06/07

Issue #5828 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#41859] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5825] Sweet instance var assignment in the object initializer — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>

1 message 2011/12/31

[#41860] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5830][Open] "".byteslice(0) != "".byteslice(0, 0) — Brian Ford <brixen@...>

3 messages 2011/12/31
[#41861] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5830][Rejected] "".byteslice(0) != "".byteslice(0, 0) — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/12/31

[#41864] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5830][Open] "".byteslice(0) != "".byteslice(0, 0) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/31

[#41862] [ruby-trunk - Feature #2340] Removing YAML/Syck — Alexey Muranov <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/12/31

[#41863] RB_GC_GUARD complaint — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Probably old news, but thought I'd point out that Kurt Stephens:

3 messages 2011/12/31
[#41923] Re: RB_GC_GUARD complaint — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2012/01/05

> thinks that this type of bug:
[#41964] Re: RB_GC_GUARD complaint — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2012/01/07

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 17:38, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:

[ruby-core:41750] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join

From: Michel Demazure <michel@...>
Date: 2011-12-20 10:24:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #41750 
Nikolai Weibull wrote in post #1037488:
> More importantly, however, is that Gtk::FileSelection has been
> superseded by Gtk::FileChooser, so I don=E2=80=99t think that the Gtk
> developers will work on this.  Gtk::FileChooser seems to support
> slashes:
>
> require 'gtk2'
>
> Gtk::FileChooserDialog.new.set_filename('/Windows').show_all
> Gtk.main

Yes FileSelection is deprecated, but I used it because FileChooserDialog
raises two warnings (at least on Windows), claiming it does not finding
the gtk-file icon nor the hicolor theme.

_md

-- =

Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.=

In This Thread

Prev Next