[#41431] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

27 messages 2011/12/01
[#41442] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/01

[#41443] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/01

Maybe we can add a new arity_range method that does this?

[#41496] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714][Open] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

22 messages 2011/12/06

[#41511] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Nick Quaranto <nick@...>

13 messages 2011/12/07

[#41557] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

14 messages 2011/12/08

[#41586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Open] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

17 messages 2011/12/10

[#41672] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Open] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

13 messages 2011/12/15

[#41681] Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

Since Ruby is built on top of simple concepts, most of the documentation

23 messages 2011/12/15
[#41683] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/15

[#41686] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/16

Em 15-12-2011 19:23, Gary Wright escreveu:

[#41717] Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...>

In Windows, when using File.join, one often ends with a path containing

13 messages 2011/12/19
[#41719] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com> wrot=

[#41720] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/19

Luis Lavena wrote in post #1037331:

[#41728] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781][Open] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

15 messages 2011/12/19

[#41799] Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2011/12/24
[#41800] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/24

2011/12/24 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#41811] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/26

Hello,

[#41817] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/26

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:51 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

[#41812] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Open] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

11 messages 2011/12/26

[ruby-core:41625] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5755][Assigned] Errors raised and rescued in Kernel#loaded file still propagate

From: Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Date: 2011-12-13 03:24:11 UTC
List: ruby-core #41625
Issue #5755 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.

File bug_5755.patch added
Category set to core
Status changed from Open to Assigned
Assignee set to Tomoyuki Chikanaga
Target version set to 2.0.0

Thank you for your report.
I think this is a bug too.

I've found a bad usage of rb_protect() in name_err_mesg_to_str(). When an exception is going to ignored, rb_thread_t::errinfo should be cleared. I'll attach a patch. I'd like to commit it later if there's no objection.

BTW, I wonder if the similar problem exists in openssl extension. nahi-san, how do you think?
----------------------------------------
Bug #5755:  Errors raised and rescued in Kernel#loaded file still propagate
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5755

Author: Nikolai Weibull
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Tomoyuki Chikanaga
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0
ruby -v: -


 a.rb:
 
 load 'b.rb'
 
 b.rb:
 
 begin
   BasicObject.new.inspect
 rescue => e
   p e
 end
 
 % ruby -v
 ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33569) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0]
 % ruby a.rb
 #<NoMethodError: undefined method `inspect' for #<BasicObject:0x0000010090b388>>
 b.rb:4:in `to_str': undefined method `inspect' for
 #<BasicObject:0x0000010090b388> (NoMethodError)
         from b.rb:4:in `to_s'
         from b.rb:4:in `inspect'
         from b.rb:4:in `p'
         from b.rb:4:in `rescue in <top (required)>'
         from b.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
         from a.rb:1:in `load'
         from a.rb:1:in `<main>'
 % ruby b.rb
 #<NoMethodError: undefined method `inspect' for #<BasicObject:0x0000010090b388>>
 
 This is a bug, right?


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next