[#41431] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

27 messages 2011/12/01
[#41442] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/01

[#41443] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/01

Maybe we can add a new arity_range method that does this?

[#41496] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714][Open] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

22 messages 2011/12/06

[#41511] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Nick Quaranto <nick@...>

13 messages 2011/12/07

[#41557] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

14 messages 2011/12/08

[#41586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Open] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

17 messages 2011/12/10

[#41672] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Open] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

13 messages 2011/12/15

[#41681] Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

Since Ruby is built on top of simple concepts, most of the documentation

23 messages 2011/12/15
[#41683] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/15

[#41686] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/16

Em 15-12-2011 19:23, Gary Wright escreveu:

[#41717] Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...>

In Windows, when using File.join, one often ends with a path containing

13 messages 2011/12/19
[#41719] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com> wrot=

[#41720] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/19

Luis Lavena wrote in post #1037331:

[#41728] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781][Open] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

15 messages 2011/12/19

[#41799] Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2011/12/24
[#41800] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/24

2011/12/24 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#41811] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/26

Hello,

[#41817] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/26

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:51 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

[#41812] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Open] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

11 messages 2011/12/26

[ruby-core:41460] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5659] bug releasing a gem created with rails 3.1

From: Vinicius Gati <viniciusgati@...>
Date: 2011-12-03 13:39:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #41460
Issue #5659 has been updated by Vinicius Gati.


[viniciusgati] ~/Code/ruby/testes
$ cd test_rb_bug/

[viniciusgati] ~/Code/ruby/testes/test_rb_bug (master)
$ rvm use 1.9.2
Using /Users/viniciusgati/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290

[viniciusgati] ~/Code/ruby/testes/test_rb_bug (master)
$ rvm list

rvm rubies

=> ruby-1.9.2-p290 [ i386 ]
   ruby-1.9.3-head [ x86_64 ]
   ruby-1.9.3-p0 [ x86_64 ]


[viniciusgati] ~/Code/ruby/testes/test_rb_bug (master)
$ rake release
Could not find activesupport-3.1.3 in any of the sources
Run `bundle install` to install missing gems.

[viniciusgati] ~/Code/ruby/testes/test_rb_bug (master)
$ bundle
Fetching source index for http://rubygems.org/
Using rake (0.9.2.2) 
Using multi_json (1.0.3) 
Installing activesupport (3.1.3) 
Using builder (3.0.0) 
Using i18n (0.6.0) 
Installing activemodel (3.1.3) 
Using erubis (2.7.0) 
Using rack (1.3.5) 
Using rack-cache (1.1) 
Using rack-mount (0.8.3) 
Using rack-test (0.6.1) 
Using hike (1.2.1) 
Using tilt (1.3.3) 
Using sprockets (2.0.3) 
Installing actionpack (3.1.3) 
Using mime-types (1.17.2) 
Using polyglot (0.3.3) 
Using treetop (1.4.10) 
Using mail (2.3.0) 
Installing actionmailer (3.1.3) 
Using arel (2.2.1) 
Using tzinfo (0.3.31) 
Installing activerecord (3.1.3) 
Installing activeresource (3.1.3) 
Using bundler (1.0.21) 
Using rack-ssl (1.3.2) 
Using json (1.6.1) 
Using rdoc (3.11) 
Using thor (0.14.6) 
Installing railties (3.1.3) 
Using jquery-rails (1.0.18) 
Installing rails (3.1.3) 
Using sqlite3 (1.3.4) 
Using test_rb_bug (0.0.1) from source at . 
Your bundle is complete! Use `bundle show [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is installed.

[viniciusgati] ~/Code/ruby/testes/test_rb_bug (master)
$ rake release
test_rb_bug 0.0.1 built to pkg/test_rb_bug-0.0.1.gem
Tagged v0.0.1
Pushed git commits and tags
Pushed test_rb_bug 0.0.1 to rubygems.org

----------------------------------------
Bug #5659: bug releasing a gem created with rails 3.1
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5659

Author: Vinicius Gati
Status: Feedback
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 
ruby -v: 1.9.3-head


I made a rails engine using rails 3.1

the steps i follow was :

i created the engine with rails new plugin test_rb_bug

then i updated the gemspec

then i created a git repo and pushed: https://github.com/viniciusgati/test_rb_bug

after that i do a rake release and got the error: https://gist.github.com/1383444 obs: this gist contains the machos crash report to

the gist is the error for the first gem when i found the error.

and i reproduced the same now with a fresh engine...

system: MacOS lion
rails: 3.1.3
ruby: 1.9.3-head
rvm: 1.8.6
rubygems 1.8.10






-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread