[#41431] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694][Open] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

27 messages 2011/12/01
[#41442] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...> 2011/12/01

[#41443] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5694] Proc#arity doesn't take optional arguments into account. — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2011/12/01

Maybe we can add a new arity_range method that does this?

[#41496] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5714][Open] Unexpected error of STDIN#read with non-ascii input on Windows XP — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

22 messages 2011/12/06

[#41511] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5719][Open] Hash::[] can't handle 100000+ args — Nick Quaranto <nick@...>

13 messages 2011/12/07

[#41557] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5730][Open] Optinal block parameters assigns wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

14 messages 2011/12/08

[#41586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5741][Open] Secure Erasure of Passwords — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

17 messages 2011/12/10

[#41672] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5767][Open] Cache expanded_load_path to reduce startup time — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>

13 messages 2011/12/15

[#41681] Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

Since Ruby is built on top of simple concepts, most of the documentation

23 messages 2011/12/15
[#41683] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/12/15

[#41686] Re: Documentation of the language itself (syntax, meanings, etc) — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/12/16

Em 15-12-2011 19:23, Gary Wright escreveu:

[#41717] Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...>

In Windows, when using File.join, one often ends with a path containing

13 messages 2011/12/19
[#41719] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/19

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com> wrot=

[#41720] Re: Feature : optional argument in File.join — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2011/12/19

Luis Lavena wrote in post #1037331:

[#41728] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5781][Open] Query attributes (attribute methods ending in `?` mark) — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>

15 messages 2011/12/19

[#41799] Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2011/12/24
[#41800] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/12/24

2011/12/24 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#41811] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/12/26

Hello,

[#41817] Re: Best way to separate implementation specific code? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/12/26

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 10:51 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

[#41812] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5809][Open] Benchmark#bm: remove the label_width parameter — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

11 messages 2011/12/26

[ruby-core:41434] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5539] Readline.readline() blocks all threads

From: Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Date: 2011-12-01 14:55:52 UTC
List: ruby-core #41434
Issue #5539 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.


Takao san,
Is it hard to make time to take a look at this issue?

Thanks,
----------------------------------------
Bug #5539: Readline.readline() blocks all threads
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5539

Author: Christopher Huff
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Kouji Takao
Category: ext
Target version: 
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33570) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0]


The standard library Readline.readline() function blocks the thread it's called from without unlocking the VM, thus blocking all threads. This code demonstrates the problem:

require 'pp'
t = Thread.new {10.times {|x| puts x; sleep 1}}
while(buf = Readline.readline)
    p buf
    if(buf == 'q')
        break
    end
end

Thread t will be blocked by the readline call, numbers being printed occasionally when lines are entered and readline() returns, rather than once per second. Reproduced on ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30909) [x86_64-darwin10.6.0] and ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33570) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0].

The RubyInline gem allows a workaround:

require 'inline'
class BetterReadline
    inline :C do |builder|
        builder.include '<ruby.h>'
        builder.include '<readline/readline.h>'
src = <<END
    VALUE readline_intern(void * data) {
        char ** rstr = (char **)data;
        *rstr = readline(NULL);
        return Qnil;
    }
END
        builder.prefix(src)
src = <<END
    VALUE rb_readline(void) {
        char * str = NULL;
        rb_thread_blocking_region(readline_intern, &str, NULL, NULL);
        return rb_str_new2(str);
    }
END
        builder.c_singleton(src, method_name: 'readline')
    end
end # class BetterReadline


This then illustrates the desired behavior, with the thread running in the background while readline() waits for input:

require 'pp'
t = Thread.new {10.times {|x| puts x; sleep 1}}
while(buf = BetterReadline.readline)
    p buf
    if(buf == 'q')
        break
    end
end


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next